Advertisement

Archiv für Mikrobiologie

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 95–118 | Cite as

The ultrastructure of holdfasts, “rhizoids”, and “slime tracks” in thraustochytriaceous fungi and Labyrinthula spp.

  • Frank O. Perkins
Article

Summary

The fine structure of the holdfasts or “rhizoids” is described for the thraustochytriaceous organisms, Thraustochytrium motivum, Schizochytrium aggregatum, and an unidentified organism, denoted T-20, which resembles S. aggregatum and Labyrinthula spp. Labyrinthula algeriensis and L. minuta “slime track” ultrastructure is also described. The holdfasts, rhizoids, and tracks have the same basic fine structure and are collectively termed ectoplasmic nets. They are delimited by a unit membrane which is in continuity with the plasmalemma, contain no cytoplasmic organelles only membrane-limited cisternae, and contain a fibrogranular ground substance. The nets appear to arise from one or as many as 20 organelle complexes consist of an approximately disk-shaped electron-dense granular aggregate in which are embedded portions of cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum or perinuclear clear continuum. The cisternae appear to contribute small (ca. 17 nm diameter) vesicles to the granular aggregate which coalesce to form internal membranes of the net elements. The sagenogenetosome underlies the plasmalemma where it evaginates to form the delimiting membrane of the main trunk element of the net. No continuous membrane separates the net contents from the cytoplasm, only the granular aggregate.

In L. algeriensis, L. minuta, and T-20 the net is necessary for motility of nonflagellated, nonamoeboid cells. Presence of the nets is not associated with motility in S. aggregatum and T. motivum. The possible taxonomic significance of the observations is discussed.

Keywords

Fine Structure Main Trunk Ground Substance Basic Fine Cytoplasmic Organelle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartsch, G.: Cytologische Beobachtungen an Labyrinthula coenocystis Schmoller bei verschiedenen Kulturbedingungen. Z. allg. Mikrobiol. 11, 79–90 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. Booth, T., Miller, C. E.: Comparative morphologic and taxonomic studies in the geneus Thraustochytrium. Mycologia (N.Y.) 60, 480–495 (1968).Google Scholar
  3. Bouck, G. B.: The structure, origin, isolation, and composition of the tubular mastigonemes of the Ochromonas flagellum. J. Cell Biol. 50, 362–384 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. Darley, W. M., Fuller, M. S.: Cell wall chemistry and taxonomic position of Schizochytrium (Abst.). Amer. J. Bot. 57, 761 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Drum, R. W., Hopkins, J. T.: Diatom locomotion: an explanation. Protoplasma (Wien) 62, 1–33 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. Duboscq, O.: Labyrinthomyxa sauvageaui n. g. n. sp., Proteomyxee parasite de Laminaria lejolisii Sauvageau. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 84, 27–33 (1921).Google Scholar
  7. Fuller, M. S., Fowles, B. E., McLaughlin, D. J.: Isolation and pure culture study of marine Phycomycetes. Mycologia (N. Y.) 56, 745–756 (1964).Google Scholar
  8. Geitler, L.: Ein grünes Filarplasmodium und andere neue Protisten. Arch. Protistenk. 69, 615–636 (1930).Google Scholar
  9. Goldstein, S.: Development and nutrition of new species of Thraustochytrium. Amer. J. Bot. 50, 271–279 (1963a).Google Scholar
  10. —: Studies of a new species of Thraustochytrium that displays light stimulated growth. Mycologia (N. Y.) 60, 799–811 (1963b).Google Scholar
  11. — Belsky, M.: Axenic culture studies of a new marine phycomycete possessing an unusual type of asexual reproduction. Amer. J. Bot. 51, 72–78 (1964).Google Scholar
  12. Hollande, A., Enjumet, M.: Sur l'évolution et la systématique des Labyrinthulidae étude de Labyrinthula algeriensis nov. sp. Ann. Sci. nat. Zool. 17, 357–368 (1955).Google Scholar
  13. Honigberg, B. M., Balamuth, W., Bovee, E. C., Corliss, J. O., Gojdies, M., Hall, R. P., Kudo, R. R., Levine, N. D., Loeblich, A. R., Jr., Weiser, J., Wenrich, D. H.: A revised classification of the phylum Protozoa. J. Protozool. 11, 7–20 (1964).Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, T. W., Jr.: On the marine phycomycete Thraustochytrium proliferum. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 40, 292–294 (1957).Google Scholar
  15. Karling, J. S.: Phagomyxa algarum n. gen., n. sp., an unusual parasite with plasmodiophoralean and proteomyxean characteristics. Amer. J. Bot. 31, 38–52 (1944).Google Scholar
  16. Kazama, F.: Ultrastructure of Thraustochytrium sp. zoospores. I. Kinetosome. Arch. Mikrobiol. 83, 179–189 (1972).Google Scholar
  17. Mackin, J. G., Ray, S. M.: The taxonomic relationships of Dermocystidium marinum Mackin, Owen, and Collier. J. Invert. Path. 8, 544–545 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. Marszalek, D. S.: Observations on Iridia diaphana, a marine foraminifer. J. Protozool. 16, 599–611 (1969).Google Scholar
  19. McManus, M. A.: Ultrastructure of myxomycete plasmodia of various types. Amer. J. Bot. 52, 15–25 (1965).Google Scholar
  20. Outka, D. E.: Cytochemical and ultrastructural studies on the electron-opaque core of Tetrahymena kinetosomes (Abst.). J. Protozool. 18 (Suppl.), 18 (1971).Google Scholar
  21. Perkins, F. O.: Ultrastructure of vegetative stages in Labyrinthomyxa marina (=Dermocystidium marinum), a commercially significant oyster pathogen. J. Invert Path. 13, 199–222 (1969).Google Scholar
  22. — Amon, J. P.: Zoosporulation in Labyrinthula sp., an electron microscope study. J. Protozool. 16, 235–257 (1969).Google Scholar
  23. Pokorny, K. S.: Labyrinthula. J. Protozool. 14, 697–708 (1967).Google Scholar
  24. Porter, D.: Ultrastructure of Labyrinthula. Protoplasma (Wien) 67, 1–19 (1969).Google Scholar
  25. Schmoller, H.: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Labyrinthulen-Entwicklung. Arch. Protistenk. 109, 226–244 (1966).Google Scholar
  26. Sparrow, F. K., Jr.: Aquatic phycomycetes, 2nd ed., pp. 828–832. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1960.Google Scholar
  27. Stey, H.: Nachweis eines bisher unbekannten Organells bei Labyrinthula. Z. Naturforsch. 23b, 567–568 (1968).Google Scholar
  28. —: Elektonenmikroskopische Untersuchung an Labyrinthula coenocystis Schmoller. Z. Zellforsch. 102, 387–418 (1969).Google Scholar
  29. Ulken, A.: Zwei neue Thraustochytrien aus der Außenweser Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerhaven 9, 289–295 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. Van Iterson, W.: The bacterial cell surface. In: Handbook of molecular cytology, pp. 150–173, A. Lima-De-Faria, ed. New York: American Elsevier Publ. Co. 1969Google Scholar
  31. Watson, S. W., Raper, K. B.: Labyrinthula minuta sp. nov. J. gen. Microbiol. 17, 368–377 (1957).Google Scholar
  32. Wohlfarth-Bottermann, K. E.: Protistenstudien. X. Licht-und elektronen-mikrokopische Untersuchungen an der Amöbe Hyalodiscus simplex n. sp. Protoplasma (Wien) 52, 58–107 (1960).Google Scholar
  33. —: Cytologische Studien. VIII. Zum Mechanismus der Cytoplasmaströmung in dünnen Fäden. Protoplasma (Wien) 54, 1–26 (1961).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank O. Perkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceGloucester PointU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations