Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of published reports of unethical conduct on stock prices

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study adds to the empirical evidence supporting a significant connection between ethics and profitability by examining the connection between published reports of unethical behaviour by publicly traded U.S. and multinational firms and the performance of their stock. Using reports of unethical behaviour published in the Wall Street Journal from 1989 to 1993, the analysis shows that the actual stock performance for those companies was lower than the expected market adjusted returns. Unethical conduct by firms which is discovered and publicized does impact on the shareholders by lowering the value of their stock for an appreciable period of time. Whatever their views on whether ethical behaviour is profitable, managers should be able to see a definite connection between unethical behaviour and the worth of their firm's stock. Stockholders, the press and regulators should find this information important in pressing for greater corporate and managerial accountability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartkowiak, J. J.: 1993, ‘Trends Towards Part Time Employment: Ethical Issues’, Journal of Business Ethics 12(10), 811–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P.: 1993, Business and Its Environment (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.), pp. 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berney, K.: 1987, ‘The Ethical Edge’, Nation's Business (Aug.), 18–24.

  • Nations Business: 1993, (Dec.), 85.

  • Carr, A.: 1968, ‘Is Business Bluffing Ethical?’, Harvard Business Review 46, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J. and P. Davis: 1990, ‘Business Ethics? Yes, but What Can It Do for the Bottom Line?’, Management Decision 28(6), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, G. C.: 1991, ‘Does It Pay to Do the Right Thing?’, Across the Board 28(7, 8), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D.: 1986, Study on Productivity (Harvard Business School, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, C. A.: 1992, ‘Do Profits and Social Responsibility Mix?’, Executive Excellence 9(30), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. and J. Matthews: 1982, ‘Can a Corporation Have a Conscience’, Harvard Business Review 60, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. B. III and D. Strutton: 1994, ‘Two Practical Guidelines for Resolving Truth-Telling Problems’, Journal of Business Ethics, 13 in Press.

  • Hoch, D. and J. B. Hamilton III: 1994, ‘Do Shareholder Resolutions Influence Corporate Ethics?’, Southeastern Journal of Legal Studies in Business 3(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Moralization: the Cognitive-Development Approach’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behaviour: Theory, Research, and Social Issues (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), pp. 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S.: 1992, ‘Lessons from a Hurricane: It Pays Not to Gouge’, New York Times 142 (September 22), D1.

  • Miles, G.: 1993, ‘In Search of Ethical Profits: Insights from Strategic Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 12(3), 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek: 1991, January 7, 42–43.

  • Rao, S. M., C. M. Kochunny and H. Rogers: 1993, ‘Ethical Inclinations of Future Financiers’ American Business Review XI(2), June, pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. and D. Robin: 1989, Ethics and Profits: A Convergence of Corporate America's Economic and Social Responsibilities (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, E.: 1992, ‘Adam Smith and Conservative Economic’, Economic History Review, 45.

  • Sen, A.: 1987, On Ethics and Economics (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1993, ‘Does Business Ethics Make Economic Sense?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(1), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Jr.: 1992, ‘Economics and Ethics: The Case of Solomon Brothers’, Financial Management Collection 7, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1991, Morality and the Market: Consumer Pressure for Corporate Responsibility (Routledge, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 1993, ‘Beyond Selfishness: Adam Smith and the Limits of the Market’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(4), 453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffman, D.: 1991 ‘Good Behaviour and the Bottom Line’, Canadian Business 64(5), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H.: 1991, Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, The Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1994, Business and Society, 2nd Ed. (Harper Collins, New York), p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetlin, M.: 1991, ‘Ethics and Common Sense’, Management Review 80(6), 59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Spuma M. Rao is Associate Professor of Finance, College of Business Administration, University of Southwestern Louisiana. His publications appear in such journals as Global Finance, American Business Review, Financial and Strategic Decision Making, Business and Economic Review, The Appraisal.

J. Brooke Hamilton III is Assistant Professor in the Department of Management, University of Southwestern Louisiana. He was head of the Philosophy Department at Tuskegee Institute, spent 14 years in industry and returned to academe after completing his M.B.A. His work appears in the Journal of Business Ethics, Southeastern Journal of Legal Studies in business, and the proceeding of the Southern and Southwestern Marketing Associations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, S.M., Brooke Hamilton, J. The effect of published reports of unethical conduct on stock prices. J Bus Ethics 15, 1321–1330 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411817

Keywords

Navigation