Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

EC regulation of the export of dangerous pharmaceuticals to Third World countries: Some prospects

Die Regulierung des Exports gefährlicher Arzneimittel in die Dritte Welt durch die EG

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Double standards” in the regulatory status of pharmaceuticals enable the pharmaceutical industry to dump to third world countries medicines whose use is restricted or banned domestically. Numerous initiatives have been taken at the international level to tackle the problem, namely by the World Health Organisation. The European Community remained for a long time silent and promoted a laissezfaire policy, thereby giving carte blanche for the uncontrolled export of pharmaceuticals. However, a change of the European Community's attitude towards the export issue seems to be in the offing. The paper analyses the possibilities of the European Community to participate in the already existing WHO regulatory mechanisms and to design Community actions with the aim of curbing the trade with dangerous pharmaceuticals.

Zusammenfassung

“Double Standards” im regulatorischen Status von Arzneimitteln ermöglichen es der pharmazeutischen Industrie, Produkte, deren Vertrieb in den Industrieländern verboten oder “streng” beschränkt ist, in die Länder der Dritten Welt abzusetzen. Die Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) hat eine Reihe von Initiativen unternommen, um dem Problem Herr zu werden. Die Europäische Gemeinschaft hat sich zurückgehalten und bis in die 80er Jahre eine reine Laissez-Faire Politik betrieben. Exporte unterliegen auch nach den derzeitigen gemeinschaftlichen Regeln praktisch keinen Beschränkungen. Es mehren sich aber die Anzeichen dafür, daß diese Position nicht mehr haltbar ist. Dieses Papier unternimmt den Versuch, die Möglichkeiten der EG an einer verstärkten Teilnahme an den vorhandenen Mechanismen der WHO auszuloten. Hauptsächlich geht es aber um eine Klärung der Frage, ob die EG eine eigenständige Exportpolitik formulieren kann und welche Form sie haben könnte und müßte, um die Mißstände zu beseitigen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldridge, M., & Haig, A. M. (1982). Report to the President on the review of U.S. hazardous substances export policy and cover letter to USTR Brock from Secretaries Haig and Baldridge. U.S. Export Weekly, 335–342.

  • Barber, M. S., & Barnacel, P. A. (1984). Bitter pills — The right kind of medicine. Richmond: PJB.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEUC and IOCU Recommendations for Community Legislation (1985). Exports of dangerous medicinal products from the countries of the European Community to the Third World. The Hague: IOCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoignie, T. (1986). Exports of dangerous medicinal products from the territory of the European community to the Third World countries. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique, Centre de Droit de la Consommation. CDC doc 3/1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broch, L. (1984). Corporate responsibility in the pharmaceutical industry in marketing of medicine. The Hague: IOCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • CADE (1986). Position paper on the Commission proposal for a regulation concerning export from and import into the Community of certain dangerous chemicals, Com(86) 362 Final. Brussels: Coalition Against Dangerous Exports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetley, A. (1985). Cleared for export. An examination of the European Community's pharmaceutical and chemical trade. Brussels: Coalition Against Dangerous Exports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetley, A. (1986). Not good enough for us but fit for them — An examination of the chemical and pharmaceutical export trades. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9, 155–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, S. A. (1981). Executive authority: Revocation of executive order requiring notification of export of hazardous substances. Harvard Law Review, 22, 683–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone, E. (1983). International regulation of pharmaceuticals — The role of the World Health Organization. Virginia Journal of International Law, 23, 331–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Commission (1986). Proposal for a Council regulation concerning export from and import into the Community of certain dangerous chemicals. Com(86) 362 Final, 25.6.1986.

  • FAO (1985). International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, D. J. (1985). Legal aspects of the export of hazardous products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 8, 209–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICDRA (1984). Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • International nanny — Regulating hazardous exports (1980). AEI Journal of Government and Society, Regulation Magazine (November/December), 8–13.

  • Kay, D. (1976). The international regulation of pharmaceuticals. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, L. (1986). EEC consumer law. Brussels: E. Story-Scientia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, A. (1985). The Faith Halter report. Chemistry and Industry, October 7, pp. 656–659.

  • Medawar, C. (1979). Insult or injury. London: Social Audit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, C. (1984). Drugs and world health. Bodegraven: IOCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose, D. (1982). Bitter pills, medicines, and the Third World. Oxford: Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1984). Recommendation of the Council concerning information exchange related to exports of banned or severely restricted chemicals. Paris: OECD. C(84) 37 Final 27.4.1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallemaerts, M. (1985). Diplomacy and double standards: The regulation of international trade in pesticides. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School. Master's thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatore, P. (1969). La politique commerciale. In: W. J. Fanshof van der Meersch (Ed.), Les novelles droit des Communautés Européennes, pp. 917–942. Brussels: Larcier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, N. (1987). Förderung und Schutz diffuser Interessen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, N., & Micklitz, H.-W. (1980). Consumer protection in the Federal Republic of Germany. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, N., & Smith, L. J. (1983). Implementation of the International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes by the EEC. Journal of Consumer Policy, 6, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, S. J. (1985). Hazardous exports: United States and international policy developments. Washington, DC: Natural Resource Defense Council. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulberg, F. (1979). United States export of products banned for domestic use. Harvard International Law Journal, 20, 331–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seferovich, P. B. (1981). United States export of banned products: Legal and moral implications. Denver Journal of International Law. 10, 537–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simitis, K. (1976). Verbraucherschutz — Schlagwort oder Rechtsprinzip. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel, C. (1981). The role of international organisations in medicines policy. In: N. Blum, A. Herxheimer, C. Stenzel, & J. Woodcock (Eds.), Pharmaceuticals and health policy, pp. 211–240. London: Social Audit.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1984). Provisional Notification Scheme for Banned and Severely Restricted Chemicals. Adopted by the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Nairobi: UNEP Secretariat. UNEP/GC 12/14, 23 May, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1986). Second Revised Draft Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on Potentially Toxic Chemicals in International Trade — Comments of governments, organisations and bodies within the UN system and other intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations. Nairobi: UNEP Secretariat. UNEP/WG 155/2, 12 November, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrli, A. (1986). Quality control of drugs. Swiss Pharma, 8 (No. 11 a), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Expert Committee (1983). The use of essential drugs. Geneva: WHO. Technical Report Series 685.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Hans-W. Micklitz is a Research Fellow at the Centre for European Legal Policy, Universitätsallee GW1, D-2800 Bremen 33, FRG.

The paper has arisen out of the author's activities as a consultant to the International Organization of Consumers Unions. It is part of a more comprehensive report, “Exports of dangerous products to the Third World,” distributed under the auspices of Bureau Européen des Unions des Consommateurs (Brussels) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbraucher (Bonn).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Micklitz, H.W. EC regulation of the export of dangerous pharmaceuticals to Third World countries: Some prospects. J Consum Policy 11, 29–53 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411519

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411519

Keywords

Navigation