Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 143, Issue 3, pp 290–296 | Cite as

Changes in turgor pressure in response to increases in external NaCl concentration in the gas-vacuolate cyanobacterium Microcystis sp.

  • R. H. Reed
  • A. E. Walsby
Original Papers

Abstract

Changes in cell turgor pressure have been followed in cells of Microcystis sp. transferred to culture medium containing added NaCl at osmolalities of 30–1,500 mosmol kg-1 (≡ 74–3,680 kPa). Upon upshock turgor decreased, due to osmotically-induced water loss from the cell. However, partial recovery of turgor was then observed in illuminated cells, with maximum turgor regain in media containing 30–500 mosmol kg-1 NaCl. The lightdependent recovery of turgor pressure was completed within 60 min, with no evidence of further changes in cell turgor up to 24 h. This is the first direct evidence that turgor regulation may occur in a prokaryotic organism. Short-term increases in cell K+ content were also observed upon upshock in NaCl, indicating that turgor regain may involve a turgorsensitive K+ uptake system. Estimation of internal K+ concentration in cells transferred to 250 mosmol kg-1 NaCl showed that changes in cell K+ may account for at least half of the observed turgor regain up to 60 min.

Key words

Cyanobacteria Turgor pressure Salt shock Turgor regulation K+ uptake, Microcystis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alemohammad MM, Knowles CJ (1974) Osmotically induced volume and turbidity changes of Escherichia coli due to salts, sucrose and glycerol, with particular reference to the rapid penetration of glycerol into the cell. J Gen Microbiol 82:125–142Google Scholar
  2. Allison EM, Walsby AE (1981) The role of potassium in the control of turgor pressure in a gas-vacuolate blue-green alga. J Exp Bot 32:241–249Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Amotz A, Avron M (1983) Accumulation of metabolites by halotolerant algae and its industrial potential. Ann Rev Microbiol 37:95–119Google Scholar
  4. Bisson MA, Gutknecht J (1975) Osmotic regulation in the marine alga Codium decorticatum. I. Regulation of turgor pressure by control of ionic composition. J Membrane Biol 24:183–200Google Scholar
  5. Blumwald E, Tel-Or E (1982) Osmoregulation and cell composition in salt-adaptation of Nostoc muscorum. Arch Microbiol 132:168–172Google Scholar
  6. Borowitzka LJ, Demmerle S, Mackay MA, Norton RS (1980) Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance study of osmoregulation in a blue-green alga. Science 210:650–651Google Scholar
  7. Brown AD, Simpson JR (1972) Water relations of sugar-tolerant yeasts: the role of intracellular polyols. J Gen Microbiol 72:589–591Google Scholar
  8. Dewar MA, Barber J (1973) Cation regulation in Anacystis nidulans. Planta 113:143–155Google Scholar
  9. Dinsdale MT, Walsby AE (1972) The interrelations of cell turgor pressure, gas-vacuolation, and buoyancy in a blue-green alga. J Exp Bot 23:561–570Google Scholar
  10. Gadd GM, Chudek JA, Foster R, Reed RH (1984) The osmotic responses of Penicillum ochro-chloron: changes in internal solute levels in response to copper and salt stress. J Gen Microbiol 130:1969–1975Google Scholar
  11. Grant NG, Walsby AE (1977) The contribution of photosynthate to turgor pressure rise in the planktonic blue-green alga Anabaena flos-aquae. J Exp Bot 28:409–415Google Scholar
  12. Green PB (1968) Growth physics in Nitella: a method for continuous in vivo analysis of extensibility based on a micro-manometer technique for turgor pressure. Plant Physiol 43:1169–1184Google Scholar
  13. Green PB, Stanton FW (1967) Turgor pressure: direct manometric measurement in single cells of Nitella. Science 155:1675–1676Google Scholar
  14. Guggino S, Gutknecht J (1982) Turgor regulation in Valonia macrophysa following acute osmotic shock. J Membrane Biol 67:155–164Google Scholar
  15. Hastings DF, Gutknecht J (1976) Ionic relations and the regulation of turgor pressure in the marine alga Valonia macrophysa. J Membrane Biol 28:263–275Google Scholar
  16. Hellebust JA (1976) Osmoregulation. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 27:485–507Google Scholar
  17. Jennings DH (1983) Some aspects of the physiology and biochemistry of marine fungi. Biol Rev 58:423–459Google Scholar
  18. Kirst GO (1977) The cell volume of the unicellular alga Platymonas subcordiformis Hazen: Effect of the salinity of the culture medium and of osmotic stresses. Z Pflanzenphysiol 81:386–394Google Scholar
  19. Kirst GO, Bisson MA (1979) Regulation of turgor pressure in marine algae: Ions and low-molecular weight organic compounds. Aust J Plant Physiol 6:539–556Google Scholar
  20. Mackay MA, Norton RS, Borowitzka LJ (1984) Organic osmoregulatory solutes in cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 130: 2177–2191Google Scholar
  21. Measures JC (1975) Role of amino acids in osmoregulation of nonhalophilic bacteria. Nature 257:398–400Google Scholar
  22. Miller DM, Jones JH, Yopp JH, Tindall DR, Schmid WE (1976) Ion metabolism in a halophilic blue-green alga, Aphanothece halophytica. Arch Microbiol 111:145–149Google Scholar
  23. Mohammad FAA, Reed RH, Stewart WDP (1983) The halophilic cyanobacterium Synechocystis DUN 52 and its osmotic responses. FEMS Microbiol Letts 16:287–290Google Scholar
  24. Moore DJ, Reed RH, Stewart WDP (1985) The responses of cyanobacteria to low level osmotic stress: implications for the use of buffers. J Gen Microbiol 131:1267–1272Google Scholar
  25. Nobel PS (1983) Biophysical plant physiology and ecology. Freeman, San Francisco, p 608Google Scholar
  26. Parsons TR (1973) Coulter counter for phytoplankton. In: Stein JR (ed) Handbook of phycological methods, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 343–358Google Scholar
  27. Reed RH (1983) The osmotic responses of Polysiphonia lanosa (L.) Tandy from marine and estuarine sites: evidence for incomplete recovery of turgor. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 68:169–193Google Scholar
  28. Reed RH (1984a) Use and abuse of osmo-terminology: opinion. Plant Cell Envt 7:165–170Google Scholar
  29. Reed RH (1984b) Transient breakdown in the selective permeability of the plasma membrane of Chlorella emersonii in response to hyperosmotic shock: Implications for cell water relations and osmotic adjustment. J Membrane Biol 82:83–88Google Scholar
  30. Reed RH, Barron JA (1983) Physiological adaptation to salinity change in Pilayella littoralis from marine and estuarine sites. Botanica Marina 26:409–416Google Scholar
  31. Reed RH, Stewart WDP (1983) Physiological responses of Rivularia atra to salinity: osmotic adjustment in hyposaline media. New Phytol 95:595–603Google Scholar
  32. Reed RH, Stewart WDP (1985) Evidence for turgor-sensitive K+ influex in the cyanobacteria Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 and Synechocystis PCC 6714. Biochim Biophys Acta 812:155–162Google Scholar
  33. Reed RH, Collins JC, Russell G (1980) The effects of salinity upon galactosyl-glycerol content and concentration of the marine red alga Porphyra purpurea (Roth). C Ag. J Exp Bot 31:1539–1554Google Scholar
  34. Reed RH, Chudek JA, Foster R, Stewart WDP (1984a) Osmotic adjustment in cyanobacteria from hypersaline environments. Arch Microbiol 138:333–337Google Scholar
  35. Reed RH, Richardson DL, Warr SCR, Stewart WDP (1984b) Carbohydrate accumulation and osmotic stress in cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 130:1–4Google Scholar
  36. Reed RH, Richardson DL, Stewart WDP (1985) Na+ uptake and extrusion in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6714 in response to hypersaline treatment: evidence for transient changes in plasmalemma Na+ permeability. Biochim Biophys Acta 814:347–355Google Scholar
  37. Richardson DL, Reed RH, Stewart WDP (1983) Synechocystis PCC 6803: a euryhaline cyanobacterium. FEMS Microbiol Letts 18:99–102Google Scholar
  38. Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111:1–61Google Scholar
  39. Scheie PO (1969) Plasmolysis of Escherichia coli B/r with sucrose. J Bacteriol 98:335–340Google Scholar
  40. Stadelmann EJ (1969) Permeability of the plant cell. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 20:585–606Google Scholar
  41. Taiz L (1984) Plant cell expansion: regulation of cell wall mechanical properties. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35:585–657Google Scholar
  42. Thomas RH, Walsby AE (1985) Buoyancy regulation in a strain of Microcystis. J Gen Microbiol 131:799–809Google Scholar
  43. Walsby AE (1971) The pressure relationship of gas vacuoles. Proc R Soc Lond B 178:301–326Google Scholar
  44. Walsby AE (1973) A portable apparatus for measuring gas vacuolation, the strength of gas vacuoles, and turgor pressure in planktonic blue-green algae and bacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 18:653–658Google Scholar
  45. Walsby AE (1978) The gas vesicles of aquatic prokaryotes. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol 28:327–358Google Scholar
  46. Walsby AE (1980) The water relations of gas-vacuolate prokaryotes. Proc R Soc Lond B 208:73–102Google Scholar
  47. Wolf AV, Brown MG, Prentiss PG (1979) Concentrative properties of aqueous solutions: conversion tables. In: Weast RC (ed) CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics, 60th ed CRC Press, Palm Beach, Florida, pp D227–276Google Scholar
  48. Zimmermann U (1978) Physics of turgor-and osmoregulation. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 29:121–148Google Scholar
  49. Zimmermann U, Steudle E (1974) The pressure dependence of the hydraulic conductivity, the membrane resistance and membrane potential during turgor pressure regulation in Valonia utricularis. J Membrane Biol 16:331–352Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Reed
    • 1
  • A. E. Walsby
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeScotland
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations