Abstract
In Chamelaucium uncinatum, an Australian woody perennial, flower initiation ceases under continuous inductive short-day (SD) conditions after the first flowering flush. The developing flowers were found to be the prime cause of the cessation in flower initiation. Removal of flowering shoots or lowers as soon as the buds appeared resulted in continuous flower formation. Pruning the plants below the young flower buds at the same stage also caused increased flower formation at the tips of the new growth. If pruning was delayed until flower buds were approx. 3 mm in diameter, however, nor further flower initiation took place and the plants, although still under inductive conditions, shifted to vegetative growth. The inhibiting factor is translocated from one branch to another. At least a six-week “rest” period (a vegetative growth period under long-day conditions) is needed before the plants are able to respond to further SD stimuli.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LD:
-
long day
- SD:
-
short day
- SE:
-
standard error
References
Bernier, G., Kinet, J.M., Sachs, R.M. (1981) The physiology of flowering, vols. I and II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Buban, T., Faust, M. (1982) Flower bud inducction in apple trees: internal control and differentiation. Hortic. Rev. 4, 174–203
Cockshull, K.E., Horridge, J.S. (1977) Apical dominance and flower initiation in the rose. J. Hortic. Sci. 52, 421–427
Engel, R. (1983) Growth and flowering control of the vine Clerodendron speciosum. M.Sc. thesis, Hebrew Univesity of Jerusalem, Rehovot
Jackson, D.I., Sweet, G.B. (1972) Flower initiation in temperate woody plants. Hortic. Abstr. 42, 9–24
Kramer, P.J., Kozlowski, T.T. (1979) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, New York San Francisco London
Lang, A. (1965) Physiology of flower initiation. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol. 15, pt. 1., pp. 1380–1536, Ruhland, W., ed. Springer, Berlin Hedelberg New York
Miginac, E. (1978) Some aspects of regulation of flowering: role of correlative factors in photoperiodic plants. Bot. Mag., Spec. Issue 1, 159–173
Monselise, S.P., Goldschmidt, E.E. (1982) Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Hortic. Rev. 4, 128–173
Reece, P.C., Furr, J.R., Cooper, W.C. (1946) The inhibiting effect of the terminal bud on flower formation in the axillary buds of the ‘Haden’ Mango. Am. J. Bot. 33, 209–210
Sachs, R.M. (1977) Nutrient diversion: a hypothesis to explain the chemical control of flowering. HortScience 12, 220–222
Shillo, R. (1984) Chamelaucium uncinatum. In: Handbook of flowering, vol. 2, Halevy, A.H., ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. (in press)
Vince-Prue, D. (1975) Photoperiodism in plants. McGraw Hill, London
Weiner, A. (1981) Growth and flowering of Geraldton wax flower (Chamelaucium uncinatum). M.Sc. thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot
Yonemura, K., Higuchi, H. (1976) The control of flowering in christmas cactus. V. Influence of daylength and temperature on development of flower buds. Res. Bull. Aichi-Ken Agric. Res. Center for 1976, pp. 63–69
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shillo, R., Weiner, A. & Halevy, A.H. Inhibition imposed by developing flowers on further flower-bud initiation in Chamelaucium uncinatum Schau. Planta 160, 508–513 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411138
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411138