Summary
The determination of “interval cases” bears great significance in the estimation of the diagnostic sensitivity of a cancer screening programme and the setting of an appropriate periodicity of the screening terms. The concept can only be applied purposefully with regard to tumor kinetics and its relationships to the probability of tumor detection through the examination methods applied. The methodical considerations presented also result in a criticism of the “length-biased sampling” which has constantly been pointed out in the screening theory in recent years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chamberlain J, Clifford RR, Nathan BE et al. (1979) Error rates in screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography. Clin Oncol
Dohm G, Hautumm B (1979) Die Morphologie des klinischen Stadiums 0 des Prostatacarcinoms (incidental carcinoma). Urologe A 14:105–111
Duncan W, Kerr GR (1976) The curability of breast cancer. Br Med J 2:781–783
Fox SH, Moskowitz M, Saenger EL (1978) Benefit/risk analysis of aggressive mammographic screening. Radiology 128:359–365
Gautherie M, Gros CM (1980) Breast thermography and cancer risk prediction. Cancer 45:51–56
Heuser L, Spratt JS, Hisam C et al. (1979) Relation between mammary cancer groth kinetics and the intervals between screenings. Cancer 43:857–862
Kirch RLA, Klein M (1978) Prospective evaluation of periodic breast examination programs. Cancer 41:728–736
Zelen M, Feinleib M (1969) On the theory of screening for chronic diseases. Biometrika 59:601–614
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, F.W. Sensitivity determination of cancer screening programmes with the aid of “interval cases”. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 101, 331–337 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410119
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410119