Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of dexamphetamine, sodium amobarbital and meprobamate on critical frequency of flicker under two different surround illuminations

  • Published:
Psychopharmacologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects on c.f.f. of three drugs, i.e. Sodium Amytal, Dexedrine and meprobamate, and of a placebo, were tested for two different surround luminances, one higher than, and the other about equal to the test field luminance. Separate analyses were applied to c.f.f.'s obtained in the descending and ascending series as well as on the mean of those two. They showed good agreement in general and revealed the following results:

Sodium Amytal lowered c.f.f. under both surround conditions, and Dexedrine raised it likewise under both surround conditions. Meprobamate produced effects similar to Sodium Amytal but not statistically significant. When c.f.f.'s were compared for the two surrounds, the brighter surround, under all treatments, produced lower c.f.f. than did the equal surround. Under Sodium Amytal, however, this trend appeared to be slightly more accentuated than under other drugs and the placebo, but it was not statistically significant.

The possible action of the drugs in changing the sensitivity of the central nervous system to flicker, as well as in altering the degree of the lateral interaction in the nervous system is discussed, and a plan for further research under modified conditions indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, H. F., W. L. Burkhardt, A. C. Ivy and A. J. Atkinson: Effect of various drugs on psychomotor performance at ground level and at simulated altitudes of 18,000 feet in a low pressure chamber. J. Aviat. Med. 21, 221–236 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiba, S.: The effects of sodium amytal and dextro-amphetamine on the Bidwell phenomenon. (To be published.)

  • Alpern, M.: Meta-contrast. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 43, 648–657 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. H., and E. A. Bott: Effects of timing of visual stimuli on binocular fusion and flicker. Canad. J. Psychol. 6, 9–17 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H. B., R. Fitzhugh and S. W. Kuffler: Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark-adaptation. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 137, 338–354 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, S. H.: Temporal and spatial summation of extrinsic impulses with the intrinsic activity of the cortex. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 8, 41–62 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, O.: Effect of Evipan on the flicker fusion intensity in brain injuries. Acta psychiat. (Kbh.) Suppl. 58, 1–116 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C.: Area of retinal image and flicker fusion frequency. Acta physiol. scand. 28, 224–233 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Illumination of surrounding field and flicker fusion frequency with foveal images of different sizes. Acta physiol. scand. 30, 161–170 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Meprobamate: its pharmacological properties and clinical uses. Int. Rec. Med. 169, 184–196 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, S.: On subjective colour phenomena attending sudden changes of illumination. Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. 60, 368–377 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: On the negative after-images following brief retinal excitation. Proc. roy. Soc. 60, 268–271 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogoslovski, A. I.: Changements de la fréquence critique des papillotements lumineux à caractère de réflexe conditionné. Arch. Ophtal. (Paris) 2, 219–227 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, R. S., and T. C. Ruch: Regional variations in sensitivity to flicker. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 74, 407–423 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, W. J., and E. Wolf: Critical intensities for visual flicker, monocular and binocular. J. gen. Physiol. 24, 505–534 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danis, P.: Modifications de l'électrorétinogramme du rat produites par l'injection intra-artérielle proche de potassium, de vératrine et de narcotiques. J. Physiol. (Paris) 48, 479–483 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. B.: Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.): Experiments in personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and S. Aiba: The effects of stimulant and depressant drugs on the suppression of the primary visual stimulus. J. ment. Sci. 103, 661–665 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, A., and B. R. Morrison: Cortical response to sensory stimulation under deep barbiturate narcosis. J. Neurophysiol. 2, 112–118 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, A. F. Battista, P. O. Chatfield and T. P. Jarcia: Refractory phase in cerebral mechanism. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1, 141–175 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, G. A., and S. H. Bartley: The effect of steady stimulation of one part of the retina upon the critical frequency in another. J. exp. Psychol. 19, 351–356 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastaut, H.: Étude électrographique du cycle d'excitabilité cortical. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 3, 401–428 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, J. Corriol et A. Roger: Le cycle d'excitabilité des systèmes afferent corticaux chez l'homme. Rev. neurol. 84, 602 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldard, F. A.: Foveal sensitivity as influenced by peripheral stimulation. J. gen. Psychol. 7, 185–189 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Flicker relation within the fovea. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 24, 299–302 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. H., and R. Granit: Comparative studies on the peripheral and central retina. VI. Inhibition, summation and synchronization of impulses in the retina. Amer. J. Physiol. 98, 664–673 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granit, R., and P. Harper: Comparative studies on the peripheral and central retina. II. Synaptic reactions in the eye. Amer. J. Physiol. 95, 211–218 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and K. Tansley: Rods, cones and the localization of pre-excitatory inhibition in the mammalian retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 107, 54–66 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendley, C. D., T. E. Lynes and F. M. Berger: Effect of 2-methyl-2-n-propyl-1, 3-propaneidiol dicarbamate (Miltown) on central nervous system. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.) 87, 608 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarcho, L. W.: Excitability of cortical afferent systems in relation to anesthesia. Fed. Proc. 6, 137 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Excitability of cortical afferent system during barbiturate anesthesia. J. Neurophysiol. 12, 447–457 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, G. W.: Effect of auditory stimulation on the visual c.f.f. J. gen. Psychol. 33, 139–143 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravkov, S. V.: Action of aural stimuli on flicker fusion. Fiziol. Ž. SSSR. 28, 313–322 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuffler, S. W.: Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37–68 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, C., and J. Zubin: Effect of thonzylamine hydrochloride and phenobarbital sodium on certain psychological functions. J. Psychol. (Provincetown) 31, 181–200 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe, R. J., and K. Tansley: The relation of the critical frequency of flicker to the adaptation of the eye. Proc. roy. Soc. B 105, 60–92 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W.: Observation on subcortical somatic sensory mechanisms of cats under nembutal anesthesia. J. Neurophysiol. 4, 25–43 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, C. N. Woolsey and P. Bard: Observation on cortical somatic sensory mechanisms of cat and monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 4, 1–24 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, G., H. Gastaut et R. Naquet: Le cycle d'excitabilité des systèmes afferent corticaux chez l'homme. Rev. neurol. 84, 605 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakao, H., and W. P. Koella: Influence of nociceptive stimuli on evoked subcortical and cortical potentials in cat. J. Neurophysiol. 19, 187–195 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback, G. S., L. R. Krasno and A. C. Ivy: Drug effects of flicker fusion threshold. J. appl. Physiol. 4, 566–574 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., and W. A. Rosenblith: Responses to successive auditory stimuli at the cochlea and at the auditory cortex. Psychol. Monogr. 67, No 13, 26 pp. (1953).

  • Schenck, F.: Über intermittierende Netzhautreizung. I. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 64, 165–178 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, H.: Über die Messung der psychischen Ermüdung mit Hilfe des Flimmertests. Psychol. Forsch. 23, 409–463 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, C.: On binocular flicker and the correlation of activity of ‘corresponding’ retinal points. Brit. J. Psychol. 1, 26–60 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, E., and N. Enzer: Effect of Pervitin (desoxyephedrine) on fatigue of the central nervous system. J. industr. Hyg. 24, 205–209 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, and S. S. Blankstein: Effect of amphetamine (Benzedrine) on fatigue of the central nervous system. War Med. (Chicago) 1, 690–695 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, M. S. Fox and N. Enzer: Influence of vestibular stimulation on the fusion frequency of flicker. J. exp. Psychol. 29, 253–255 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, R.: Chronophorische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 134, 365–435 (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, S. E.: Narcosis and visual contour clarity. J. gen. Psychol. 36, 65–78 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M. D.: Binocular perception of flicker. Brit. J. Psychol. 24, 351–374 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiba, S. The effects of dexamphetamine, sodium amobarbital and meprobamate on critical frequency of flicker under two different surround illuminations. Psychopharmacologia 1, 89–101 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00409108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00409108

Keywords

Navigation