Skip to main content
Log in

Plotting formula for pearson type III distribution considering historical information

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the existing plotting position formulas have been proposed for use in the analysis of systematic flood records, but little has been reported on the plotting formulas for historical or non-systematic flood samples. In particular, no previous investigations have specifically examined the probability plots for the Pearson type III (P3) distribution in the analysis of historical flood information. The present paper suggests a new plotting position formula for the P3 distribution for use with both systematic and historical flood records. The proposed formula has a simple structure as do most existing formulas, but it is more flexible because in can take explicitly into account the skewness coefficient of the underlying distribution. Further, results of graphical and numerical comparisons have demonstrated that the suggested formula provided the least bias in flood quantile estimation as compared with many available plotting formulas, including the well-known Weibull formula. Finally, results of a numerical example using actual flood data have indicated the practica convenience of the proposed plotting formula. It can be concluded that the formula developed in this study is the most appropriate for the P3 distribution in the analysis of flood records considering historical information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AdmowskiK.: 1981, ‘Plotting Position Formula for Flood Frequency’, Water Resour. Bulletin, 7(2), 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • ArnellN. W., BeranM., and HoskingJ. R. M.: 1986, ‘Unbiased Plotting Position for the General Extreme Value Distribution’. J. Hydrol., 86, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BobeeB., and RobitailleR.: 1977, ‘The Use of the Pearson Type 3 and Log Pearson Type 3 Distributions Revisited’, Water Resour. REs., 13(2), 427–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • BlomG.: 1958, Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta-Variable, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • CondieR. and LeeK.: 1982, ‘Flood Frequency Analysis with Historic Information’, J. Hydrol. 58, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CunnaneC.: 1978, ‘Unbiased Plotting Positions-A Review’, J. Hydrol., 37, 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GringortenI. I.: 1963, ‘A Plotting Rule for Extreme Probability Paper’, J. Geophys. Res., 68(3), 813–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guang-YanJ.: 1987, ‘Problem is Statistical Treatment of Flood Series’, J. Hydrol., 96, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GumbelE. J.: 1943, ‘On the Plotting of Flood Discharges’, Trans. Am Geophys. Res., 68(3), 813–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • HazenA.: 1914, ‘Storage to be Provided in Impounding Reservoirs for Municipal Water Supply’, Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 77, 1547–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • HirschR. M.: 1987, ‘Probability Plotting Position Formulas for Flood Records with Historical Information’, J. Hydrol., 96, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HirschR. M. and StedingerJ. R.: 1987, ‘Plotting Positions for Historical Floods and their Precision’, Water Resour. Res. 23(4), 715–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • In-naN., and NguyenV. T. V.: 1989, ‘An Unbiased Plotting Position Formula for the General Extreme Value Distribution’, J. Hydrol., 106, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JinM. and StedingerJ. R.: 1989, ‘Flood Frequency Analysis with Regional and Historical Information’, Water Resour. Res., 25(5), 925–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • KimballF.: 1960, ‘On the Choice of Plotting Positions on Probability Paper’, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 55, 546–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • NguyenV. T. V., In-naN., and BobeeB.: 1989, ‘New Plotting Position Formula for Pearson Type III Distribution’, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 115(6), 709–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi-QianH.: 1987, ‘A General Survey of Flood-Frequency Analysis in China’, J. Hydrol., 96, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • StedingerJ. R., and cohnT.: 1986, ‘Flood Frequency Analysis with Historical and Paleoflood Information’, Water Resour. Res. 22(5), 785–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • SutcliffeJ. V.: 1987, ‘The Use of Historical Records in Flood Frequency Analysis’, J. Hydrol. 96, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ThomasW. O.Jr.: 1985, ‘A Uniform Technique for Flood Frequency Analysis’, J. Water Resour. Plan. and Man., 111(3), 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO: 1987, Casebook of Methods for Computing Hydrological Parameters for Water Projects, Paris, France.

  • WeibullW.: 1939, ‘A Statistical Theory of Strength of Materials’, Ing. Vet. Ak. Handl., 151, Generalstabens Litografiska Anstals Forlag, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • XuewuJ., JingD., ShenH. W., and SalasJ. D.: 1984, ‘Probability Plots for Pearson Type III Distribution’, J. Hydrol. 74, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZhangY.: 1982, ‘Plotting Positions of Annual Flood Extremes Considering Extraordinary Values’, Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 859–864.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Nguyen, TV., In-Na, N. Plotting formula for pearson type III distribution considering historical information. Environ Monit Assess 23, 137–152 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406958

Keywords

Navigation