Skip to main content
Log in

A novel technique for the detection of DNA single-strand breaks in human white blood cells and its combination with the unscheduled DNA synthesis assay

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A modified assay for the detection of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) in human mononucleated white blood cells (MWBCs) based on the nick translation (NT) reaction was developed and combined with the test for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS). Both assays were performed on disposable 96-well filtration plates and therefore allowed rapid and sensitive examination of SSBs and UDS. Only 5–8 ml of heparinized blood is required for an eightfold determination in both assays. The uptake of radioactive nucleotide precursors was demonstrated to depend linearly upon the NT reaction time and in both assay systems on the number of investigated cells. The best results and the lowest signal to noise ratio were obtained when the NT assay was performed at 25°C for 20 min. The test was standardized for 150000MWBCs/well and a polymerase I concentration of 20 U/ml. The same number of cells were used to measure UDS during a 4-h incubation at 37°C. We observed a dose-dependent increase in SSBs after in vitro incubation with N-methyl-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), with a detection limit of 50 μM when MNNG was present for 1 h and of 5μM after 20-h incubation period. UDS in MWBCs was increased after treatment for 1 h with MNNG (200 μM) only if poly(ADP)ribose synthesis was inhibited by 3-aminobenzamide. UDS was induced by 320 μM methyl methanesulfonate, but SSBs could only be detected after inhibition of UDS by 100 μM hydroxyurea. The described modification of the NT procedure for the detection of SSBs in DNA of human MWBCs and its combination with the detection of UDS could serve as a useful tool for biological monitoring in occupational or environmental medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anai H, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K (1988) In situ nick translation method reveals DNA strand scission in HeLa cells following heat treatment. Cancer Lett 30:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger NA (1985) Cellular responses to DNA damage: the role of poly(ADP)-ribose. Radiat Res 101:4–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boulikas T (1991) Relation between carcinogenesis, chromatin structure and poly(ADP)-ribosylation. Anticancer Res 11:489–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyum A (1977) Separtion of lymphocytes, lymphocyte subgroups and monocytes. A review. Lymphology 10:71–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Downes CS, Collins A, Johnson RT (1983) International workshop on inhibition of DNA-repair. Mutat Res 112:75–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eastman A, Barry MA (1992) The origins of DNA breaks: a consequence of DNA damage, DNA repair, or apoptosis? Cancer Invest 10:229–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fenech M, Morley AA (1985) Solutions to the kinetic problem in the micronucleus assay. Cytobios 43:233–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fornace AJ, Kinsella TJ, Dobson PP, Mitchell JB (1986) Repair of ionizing radiation DNA base damage in ataxia telangiectasia cells. Cancer Res 46:1703–1706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holz O, Krause T, Rüdiger HW (1991) Differences in DNA adduct formation between monocytes and lymphocytes after in vitro incubation with benzo(a)pyrene. Carcinogenesis 12:2181–2183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly RB, Cozzarelli NR, Deutscher MP, Lehmann IR, Kornberg A (1970) Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid XXXII. Replication of duplex DNA by polymerase at a single strand break. J Biol Chem 245:39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohn KW, Friedman CA, Ewig RAG, Igbal ZM (1974) DNA chain growth during replication of asynchronous L1210 cells. Alkaline elution of large DNA segments from cells lysed on filters. Biochemistry 13:4134–4139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Libbus BL, Illenye SA, Craighead JE (1989) Induction of DNA strand breaks in cultured rat embryo cells by crocidolite asbestos as assessed by nick translation. Cancer Res 49:5713–5718

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liebermann MW, Baney RN (1971) Studies on DNA repair in human lymphocytes treated with proximate carcinogens and alkylating agents. Cancer Res 31:1297–1306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manoharan K, Kinder D, Banerjee MR (1987) DMBA induced DNA damage in mammary epithelial cells in vitro measured by a nick translation assay. Cancer Biochem Biophys 9:127–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masuck TM, Taylor AR, Lough J (1990) Arabinosylcytosine-induced accumulation of DNA nicks in myotube nuclei detected by in situ nick translation. J Cell Physiol 144:12–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell AD, Casciano DA (1983) Unscheduled DNA synthesis tests. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Genetox program. Mutat Res 123:363–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noll H (1967) Characterization of macromolecules by constant velocity sedimentation. Nature 215:360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nose K, Okamoto H (1983) Detection of carcinogen-induced DNA breaks by nick translation in permeable cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 111:383–389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Panigrahi GB, Walker IG (1991) The reaction of acetyl-4-hydroxyaminoquinoline 1-oxide with DNA: quantitation of single-strand break formation and hyper-reactivity of DNA termini. Carcinogenesis 12:963–967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmussen RE, Painter RB (1966) Radiation-stimulated DNA synthesis in cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 29:11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roy M, Ghosh R, et al. (1981) Response of V79 cells to N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) treatment: inhibition of poly(ADP)ribose and topoisomerase activity. Mutat Res 249:195–199

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rüdiger HW (1990) Endogenous carcinogens: implications of an emerging concept. Mutat Res 238:173–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rüdiger HW, Ehlert U, Roser M, Reimers U, Lehnert G (1988) Erfahrungen mit einem modifizierten Mikronukleustest zur Erfassung genotoxischer Risiken. Verh Dtsch Ges Arbeitsmed 28:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rüdiger HW, Schwartz U, Serrand E, Stief M, Krause T, Nowak D, Doerjer G, Lehnert G (1989) Reduced 06-methylguanine repair in fibroblast cultures patients with lung cancer. Cancer Res 49:5623–5626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Golson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saul RL, Ames BN (1986) Background levels of DNA damage in the population. In: Simic M, Grossmann L, Upton A (eds) Mechanisms of DNA damage and repair. Plenum Press, New York, pp 529–535

    Google Scholar 

  27. Snyder RD (1986) Evaluation of putative inhibitors of DNA excision repair in cultured human cells by the rapid nick translation assay. Mutat Res 173:279–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Snyder RD, Matheson DW (1985) Nick translation — a new assay for monitoring DNA damage and repair in cultured human fibroblasts. Environ Mutagen 7:267–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strauss BS (1984) The interaction of u.v. — and MMS-induced DNA repair synthesis: a role for poly(ADP)-ribose? Carcinogenesis 5:577–582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work is part of a thesis by T. Krause for a medical doctorate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, T., Einhaus, M., Holz, O. et al. A novel technique for the detection of DNA single-strand breaks in human white blood cells and its combination with the unscheduled DNA synthesis assay. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 65, 77–82 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00405723

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00405723

Key words

Navigation