Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of digitalization and beta-adrenergic blockade on arrhythmias induced by the direct current defibrillator

  • Published:
Pharmacologia Clinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The lowest mean electrical energy delivered by a D. C. defibrillator, which could induce ventricular tachycardia was determined in 20 dogs and found to be 132 W/sec. In the same animals, immediately afterwards, acute digitalization was carried out with acetylstrophanthidine and the mean electrical energy required to induce ventricular tachycardia was found to be 76 W/sec. Following acute b-adrenergic blockade with intravenous administration of Trasicor, the electrical energy had to be markedly increased (mean 230 W/sec) in order to induce ventricular tachycardia. On the contrary, acute digitalization during b-adrenergic blockade decreased the incidence of arrhythmiae instead of increasing it. (Maximal electrical energy of 400 W/sec could not induce ventricular tachycardia in all animals). This paradoxical effect of digitalization may be related to a possible b-adrenergic receptor blocking action of acetylstrophanthidine. -B-adrenergic blocking agents were also found to protect the animals as well as the patients from developing post-counter shock ventricular arrhythmiae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert, R., and P. Cuddy: Digitalis intoxication following conversion to sinus rhythm. Circulation 32 58–64 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Killip, T.: Synchronized DC shock for arrhythmias. J. amer. med. Ass. 186, 1–9 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kleiger, R., and B. Lown: Cardioversion and digitalis II. Clinical studies. Circulation 36, 878–887 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lown, B., R. Kleiger, and J. Williams: Cardioversion and digitalis drugs: Changed threshold to electric shock in digitalized animals. Circulat. Res. 17, 519–532 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Méndez, C., J. Aceves, and R. Méndez: Anti-adrenergic action of digitalis on the refractory period of the A-V transmission system. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 131 199–210 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nadeau, R. A., and T. N. James: Antagonistic effects on the sinus node of acetylstrophanthidin and adrenergic stimulation. Circulat. Res. 13, 388–398 (1963).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robbins, W., W., Likoff and L. S. Dreifus: Complications and limitations of direct current countershock. J. amer. med. Ass. 190, 417–428 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ten Eick, R. E., S. R. Wyte, S. M. Ross, and B. F. Hoffmann: Postcountershock arrhythmias in untreated and digitalized dogs. Circulat. Res. 21, 375–390 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgopoulos, A.J., Karapistolis, H. & Tountas, C. Effects of digitalization and beta-adrenergic blockade on arrhythmias induced by the direct current defibrillator. Pharmacol. Clin. 1, 119–122 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00404657

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00404657

Keywords

Navigation