, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 2–5 | Cite as

Persistent MHV (mouse hepatitis virus) infection reduces the incidence of diabetes mellitus in non-obese diabetic mice

  • S. Wilberz
  • H. J. Partke
  • F. Dagnaes-Hansen
  • L. Herberg


The frequency of diabetes mellitus was compared in non-obese diabetic mice before and after inadvertent exposure of the colony to mouse hepatitis virus infection. Prior to exposure, diabetes prevalence and cumulative diabetes incidence in 7-month-old mice was 65% and 25% in females and males, respectively. Diabetes incidence/quarter revealed a seasonal pattern with peaks in winter. After mouse hepatitis exposure, the diabetes incidence in the colony decreased and testing for mouse hepatitis antibody in blood samples revealed a persistent infection. In the offspring of mice delivered by caesarian section, the diabetic incidence increased sharply from a nadir of 36% to 95% and from 9% to 65% in females and males, respectively. In individual mice, diabetes resistance was strongly correlated to high titres of mouse hepatitis virus antibody. The results of this inadvertent viral infection demonstrate that a diabetes-susceptible genotype is strongly modulated by environmental factors. Investigators studying this diabetes model should strive for specific pathogen-free colony status and a high incidence of diabetes before attempting to investigate therapeutic modalities.

Key words

NOD mice diabetes incidence seasonality mouse hepatitis virus infection 


  1. 1.
    Yui R, Fujita T (1988) Islet pathology in NOD mice. In: Shafrir E, Renold AE (eds) Frontiers in diabetes research. Lessons from animal diabetes II. Libbey, London Paris, pp 112–116Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makino S, Harada M, Kishimoto Y, Hayashi Y (1986) Absence of insulitis and overt diabetes in athymic nude mice with NOD genetic background. Exp Anim 35: 495–498Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koike T, Itoh Y, Ishii T, Ito I, Takabayashi K, Maruyama N, Tomioka H, Yoshida S (1987) Preventive effect of monoclonal antiL3T4 antibody on development of diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetes 36: 539–541Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang Y, Hao L, Gill RG, Lafferty KJ (1987) Autoimmune diabetes in NOD mouse is L3T4 T-lymphocyte dependent. Diabetes 36: 535–538Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bendelac A, Carnaud C, Boitard C, Bach JF (1987) Syngeneic transfer of autoimmune diabetes from diabetic NOD mice to healthy neonates. Requirement for both L3T4+ and Lyt2+ T cells. J Exp Med 166: 823–832Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Notkins AL, Mergenhagen SE, Howard RJ (1970) Effect of virus infections on the function of the immune system. Ann Rev Micro 24: 525–538Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Formby B, Schmid-Formby F, Iovanovic L, Peterson CM (1987) The offspring of the female diabetic “nonobese diabetic” (NOD) mouse are large for gestational age and have elevated pancreatic insulin content: a new animal model of human diabetic pregnancy. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 184: 291–294Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azuma K (1985) The influence of maternal hyperglycemia on the fetal pancreas in the NOD mouse. J Tokyo Womens Med Coll 55: 456–462Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Makino S, Muroaka Y, Kishimoto Y, Hayashi Y (1985) Genetic analysis for insulitis in NOD mice. Exp Anim 34: 425–432Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wicker LS, Miller BJ, Coker LZ, McNally SE, Scott S, Mullen Y, Appel MC (1987) Genetic control of diabetes and insulitis in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse. J Exp Med 165: 1639–1654Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Makino S, Kunimoto K, Muraoka Y, Mizushima Y, Katagiri K, Tochino Y (1980) Breeding of a non-obese, diabetic strain of mice. Exp Anim 29: 1–13Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tochino Y (1986) The NOD mouse: similarities with and differences from BB rats. In: Diabetes 1985, Serrano-Rios M, Lefebvre PJ (eds) Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam New York, pp 461–465Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harada M (1987) Immune disturbance and pathogenesis of nonobese diabetes-prone (NOD) mice. Exp Clin Endocrinol 89: 251–258Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakajima H, Tochino Y, Fujino-Kurihara H, Yamada K, Gomi M, Tajima K, Kanaya T, Miyazaki A, Miyagawa J, Hanafusa T, Mashita K, Kono N, Moriwaki K, Nonaka K, Tarui S (1985) Decreased incidence of diabetes mellitus by monosodium glutamate in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 50: 251–257Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toyota T, Satoh J, Oya K, Shintani S, Okano T (1986) Streptococcal preparation (OK-432) inhibits development of type I diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetes 35: 496–499Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atkins CE, MacDonald MJ (1987) Canine diabetes mellitus has a seasonal incidence: implications relevant to human diabetes. Diabetes Res 5: 83–87Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tochino Y (1979) The spontaneously diabetic non-obese mouse with insulitis. In: Kosaka K (ed) Tonyobyogaku 1979. Shimdan to Chiryo Sha, Tokyo, pp 19–38Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oldstone MB (1988) Prevention of type I diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice by virus infection. Science 239: 500–502Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dyrberg T, Schwimmbeck P, Oldstone M (1988) The incidence of diabetes in BB rats is decreased following acute LCMV infection. Adv Exp Med Biol 246: 397–402Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwimmbeck PL, Dyrberg T, Oldstone MBA (1988) Abrogation of diabetes in BB rats by acute virus infection. Association of viral-lymphocyte interactions. J Immunol 140: 3394–3400Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McChesney MB, Oldstone MBA (1987) Viruses perturb lymphocyte functions: selected principles characterizing virus-induced immunosuppression. Ann Rev Immunol 5: 279–304Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takeichi N, Hamada J, Takimoto M, Fujiwara K, Kobayashi H (1988) Depression of T cell-mediated immunity and enhancement of autoantibody production by natural infection with microorganisms in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Microbiol Immunol 32: 1235–1244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Wilberz
    • 1
  • H. J. Partke
    • 1
  • F. Dagnaes-Hansen
    • 2
  • L. Herberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Diabetes Forschungsinstitut der Universität DüsseldorfFRG
  2. 2.Bomholtgard Breeding Research CentreRyDenmark

Personalised recommendations