Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arsenic uptake and loss in the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to a control Crassostrea virginica was treated with 3 and 5 μg As kgp-1 for 16 wks at ambient seawater salinity and temperature to determine the potential of C. virginica as an indicator of arsenic pollution. Prior to spawning, as much as 10.3±1.5, 12.7±2.7, and 14.1±3.7 μg As gp-1 dry weight were accumulated in the total soft parts of oysters after treatment with ambient (control), 3 and 5 μg As kg-1, respectively. Immediately after spawning, an increase in tissue arsenic concentration was observed in all treatments up to week 12, after which a decrease in tissue arsenic concentrations occurred despite continuous addition of arsenic to the seawater. During the uptake period, a significant inverse relationship existed between dry weight and tissue arsenic concentration, whereas a significant direct relationship was apparent between dry weight and tissue content. Arsenic concentration in the total soft parts is not significantly related to seawater arsenic concentration over the range of concentrations used in this study. In all three treatments, arsenic uptake as concentration (μg gp-1) is not a significant linear function of time. Weight loss was significant but gradual during the first 16 wks of treatment and did not change significantly during the depuration period (wks 17–25). Tissue arsenic concentrations increased significantly in oysters from all three treatments during the depuration period. Generally, arsenic body burdens increased with increases in phytoplankton concentration and it appears that food contributes more to arsenic uptake than seawater arsenic concentrations. Since a relationship between tissue arsenic concentration and seawater arsenic concentration does not appear to exist, C. virginica would not be a good biological indicator of arsenic concentration in its environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreae, M. O.: 1978, ‘Distribution and Speciation of Arsenic in Natural Waters and Some Marine Algae’, Deep-Sea Res. 25, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barszcz, C. A., Yevich, P. P., and Zaroogian, G. E.: (in press), ‘Chronic and Latent Effects of Sodium Arsenite in the American Oyster Crassostrea viriginica’, J. Environm. Pathology and Toxicology.

  • Bohn, A.: 1975, ‘Arsenic in Marine Organisms from West Greenland’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 6, 87–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braman, R. S. and Foreback, C. C.: 1973, ‘Methylated Forms of Arsenic in the Environment’, Science 182, 1247–1249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. C.: 1926, ‘On the Presence of Compounds of Arsenic in Marine Crustaceans and Shell Fish’, Analyst 51, 548–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. A. and Tripp, M. R.: 1973, ‘Accumulation and Depuration of Mercury in the American Oyster Crassostrea virginica’, Mar. Biol. 20, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. A. and Tripp, M. R.: 1975a, ‘Accumulation, Tissue Distribution and Elimination of p203HgCl2 and CH3 203HgCl in the Tissues of the American Oyster Crassostrea virginica’, Mar. Biol. 31, 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. A. and Tripp, M. R.: 195b, ‘Factors Affecting the Accumulation and Removal of Mercury from Tissues of the American Oyster Crassostrea viriginica’, Mar. Biol. 31, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondekar, S. P. and Reddy, C. V. G.: 1974, ‘Arsenic Content in the Coastal and Estuarine Waters Around Goa. Mahasagar’, Bull. Natl. Inst. Oceanogr. (india) 7, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorgy, S., Rakestraw, N. W., and Fox, D. L.: 1948, ‘Arsenic in the Sea’, J. Mar. Res. 7, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. L. and Pilson, M. E. Q.: 1972, ‘Arsenate in the Western North Atlantic and Adjacent Regions’, J. Mar. Res. 30, 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, V. S.: 1976, ‘Arsenic Concentration in Some Coexisting Marine Organisms from Newfoundland and Labrador’, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 33, 1388–1393.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, P. J. and Jackson, A. L.: 1973, ‘Arsenic in Marine Fish and Invertebrates’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 4, 88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunde, G.: 1972, The Absorption and Metabolism of Arsenic in Fish, Reports on Technological Research Concerning Norwegian Fish Industry, Directorate of Fisheries, Bergen, Vol. 5, No. 12.

  • Lunde, G.: 1972a, ‘The Analysis of Arsenic in the Lipid Phaso from Marine and Limnetic Algae’, Acta Chemica Scandinavica 26, 2642–2644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunde, G.: 1973, ‘The Synthesis of Fat and Water Soluble Arseno Organic Compounds in Marine and Limnetic Algae’, Acta Chem. Scand. 27, 1586–1594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunde, G.: 1976, ‘Comparison of Arseno-organic Compounds from Different Marine Organisms’, J. Sci. Food Agric. 26, 1257–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, N. J., Williams, R. J., Kacprzac, J. L., Kazacos, M. N., Collins, A. J., and Auty, E. H.: 1975, ‘Heavy Metals in Cultivated Oysters (Crassostrea commercialis = Saccostrea cucullata) from the Estuaries of New South Wales’, Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 26, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, W. R.: 1975, ‘Biosynthesis of Organic Compounds in Brown Trout (Salmo trutta)’, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 32, 2385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, W. R., Black, R., and Hayward, M. J.: 1975, ‘Limited Arsenic Dispersion in Seawater, Sediments and Biota near a Continuous Source’, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 32, 1275–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, W. R., Conacher, H. B. S., Black, R., Meranger, J. C., Miles, W., Cunningham, H. M., and Squires, W. R.: 1977, ‘Implications of Inorganic/Organic Interconversion on Fluxes of Arsenic in Marine Food Webs’, Envir. Hlth. Perspectives 19, 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unlu, M. Y. and Fowler, S. W.: 1979, ‘Factors Affecting the Flux of Arsenic Through the Mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis’, Mar. Biol. 51, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. E.: 1969, ‘Über den Einfluss der Nahrungskonzentration and anderer Faktoren auf Filtrierleistung und Nährungsausnutzung der Muscheln Arctica islandica and Modiolus modiolus’, Mar. Biol. 4, 87–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaroogian, G. E., Morrison, G., and Heltshe, J. F.: 1979, ‘Crassostrea viriginica as an Indicator of Lead Pollution’, Mar. Biol. 52, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaroogian, G. E.: 1980, ‘Crassostrea virginica as an Indicator of Cadmium Pollution’, Mar. Biol. 58, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, South Ferry Rd., 02882, Narragansett, RI, USA

    G. E. Zaroogian & G. L. Hoffman

Authors
  1. G. E. Zaroogian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. L. Hoffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaroogian, G.E., Hoffman, G.L. Arsenic uptake and loss in the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica . Environ Monit Assess 1, 345–358 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403835

Keywords

Search

Navigation