Abstract
Attention is drawn to the differences in the relative intensities of the reflections of deerite measured on a Guinier photograph and those obtained from diffractometer data (Langer et al., 1977), which were probably collected without taking adequate precautions to reduce the orientation effect. Powder data for deerite, which are in conformity with the structure, are presented.
References
Bloss, F.D., Frenzel, G., Robinson, P.D.: Reducing preferred orientations in diffractometer samples. Am. Mineralogist 52, 1243–1247 (1967)
Fleet, M.: The crystal structure of deerite. Am. Mineralogist 62, 990–998 (1978)
Flörke, O.W., Saalfeld, H.: Ein Verfahren zur Herstellung texturfreier Röntgen-Pulverpräparate. Z. Krist. 106, 460–466 (1955)
Langer, K., Lattard, D., Schreyer, W.: Synthesis and stability of Deerite, Fe 2+12 Fe 3+6 (Si12O40)(OH)10, and Fe3+⇄Al3+ substitutions at 15–28 kb. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 60, 271–297 (1977)
Schliestedt, M.: Preliminary note on deerite from high-pressure metamorphic rocks of Sifnos, Greece. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 66, 105–107 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Viswanathan, K., Kohlmann, A. Influence of preferred orientation on the powder pattern of deerite. Contr. Mineral. and Petrol. 66, 431–432 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403429
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403429