Abstract
Fifty out-patients took part in a double-blind controlled comparison of two antidepressants dothiepin and amitriptyline. The subjects' psychiatric state was assessed by both self-rating and clinician-rated scales. Patients were followed up for a period of about three months.
The results of the trial showed that dothiepin was superior to amitriptyline at the 5% significance level in terms of its antidepressant activity. Dothiepin was better tolerated in relation to its side effects than amitriptyline. For relief of anxiety symptoms both drugs appeared equally effective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, A. T.: Depression, 1st edition London: Staples Press 1969.
Bradley, J. V.: Distribution-free statistical tests, 1st edition Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Publishing Co. 1968.
Brick, H., Doub, W. H., Perdue, W. C.: Effects of amitriptyline on depressive and anxiety states in penitentiary inmates. Dis. nerv. Syst. 23, 572–578 (1962).
Edelstein, E. L.: Amitriptyline in depressive states: A controlled trial. Dis. nerv. Syst. 23, 644–647 (1962).
Finney, D. J., Latscha, R., Bennett, B. M., Hsu, P.: Tables for testing significance in 2×2 contigency tables. London-New York: Cambridge University Press 1963.
Fisher, R. A.: Statistical methods for research workers, 12th edition. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. 1954.
Hordern, A., Holt, N. F., Birt, C. G., Gordon, W. F.: Amitryptyline in depressive states, phenomenology and prognostic considerations. Brit. J. Psychiat. 109, 815–825 (1963).
Kendell, R. E., Everett, B., Cooper, J. E., Sartorius, N., David, M. E.: The reliability of the “Present State Examination”. Soc. Psychiat. 3, 123–129 (1968).
Leyton, M. K.: Rapid calculation of exact probabilities for 2×3 contingency tables. Biometrics 24, 714–717 (1968).
Metýsová, J., Votava, Z.: Čs. Fysiol. 11, 534 (1962).
Mišurec, J., Náhunek, D.: Sledovanf Fotemyoklonickeho praho prilecbe antidepresivy. Activ. nerv. sup. (Praha) 7, 231–234 (1965).
Náhuneck, K., Bártová, D., Ingerová, L.: Activ. nerv. sup. (Praha) 4, 178 (1964).
Rajšner, M., Protiva, M.: Čs. Farm. 11, 404 (1962).
Rickels, K.: Some comments on non-drug factors in drug therapy. Psychosomatics 6, 303–309 (1965).
Rydzynski, Z.: Badania nad wlasnosciemi praeciwdepresyjnyrii prothiadenu. Neurol. Neurochir. Psychiat. pol. 16, 1159–1162 (1966).
Sědivec, V.: Elektroencefalograficke nalezy pri leceni prothiadenem. Čs. Psychiat. 59, 377–380 (1963).
Vencovský, E., Peterová, E.: Nase predbezne klinicke zkusenosti S prothiadenem. Čs. Psychiat. 58, 327–328 (1962).
Vinař, O., Grof, P.: Activ. nerv. sup. (Praha) 6, 179 (1964).
Votjčhovský, M., Horáčkova, E., Kuhn, E.: Vliv jednorazoveho podani thymoleptik cs vyroby na psychiku zdraveho cloveka. Activ. nerv. sup. (Praha) 5, 173–175 (1963).
Wing, J. K., Birley, J. L. T., Cooper, J. E., Graham, P., Isaacs, A. D.: Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying “Present Psychiatric State”. Brit. J. Psychiat. 113, 499–515 (1967).
Yates, F.: Contingency tables involving small numbers and the chi-square. Suppl. J. R. Statist. Soc. 1, 217–235 (1934).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lipsedge, M.S., Rees, W.L. & Pike, D.J. A double-blind comparison of dothiepin and amitriptyline for the treatment of depression with anxiety. Psychopharmacologia 19, 153–162 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402639
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402639