Skip to main content
Log in

Wave separation versus bandpass filtering: a comparative non-linear analysis of brain α-EEG signals with and without psychotropic drug treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Biological Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attempts to demonstrate low-dimensional attractor behaviour in the analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals meet with difficulties that in part stem from a departure from single-system dynamics. In order to address this problem, the α-waves can be extracted by digital filtering or by wave separation; these two techniques are compared in order to specify the conditions in which finite impulse response (FIR) bandpass filters can be used. The comparison was made using 18 EEG records of 3 min duration under resting conditions (6 subjects, 3 records per subject: prior to apomorphine administration, then 90 min and 150 min post-treatment). No presence of low-dimensional dynamic episodes in α-signals was observed without digital processing. Sixty 5 s sections showing attractor behaviour were found after filtering and twenty five 5 s sections after wave separation. The mean correlation dimension was calculated for each experimental condition and for 4 subjects, in order to observe the temporal profile of the drug. When attractors were found after wave separation, bandpass filtering then also showed attractor behaviour, with the same temporal profile. However, the reverse is not true: attractors were found after bandpass filtering that were not present after wave separation; in this case the results deserve confirmation, although the temporal profiles for all cases in which attractors were found after filtering remained comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlsson, A.: The current status of dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, Neuropsychopharmacol. 1 (1988), 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Civelli, O., Bunzow, J.R. and Grandy, D.K.: Molecular diversity of the dopamine receptors, Annual Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 32 (1992), 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Honda, T., Wada, E., Dattey, J.R. and Tank, S.A.: Differential gene expression of CCKA and CCKB receptors in the rat brain, Moll. Cell. Neurosci. 4 (1993), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lall, S.: Apomorphine in the evaluation of dopaminergic function in man, Prog. Neuropsy-chopharmacol. Biol. Psych. 12 (1988), 117–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz, E.N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atm. Sci. 20 (1963), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruelle, D.: Chemical kinetics and differentiable dynamic systems, in A. Pacault and C. Vidal (eds.), Nonlinear Phenomena in Chemical Dynamics [Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 12], Springer, 1981, pp. 30–37.

  7. Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in D.A. Rand and L.S. Young (eds.), Dynamical Systems and Turbulence [Lectures Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 898], Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 366–381.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whitney, H.: Differentiable manifolds, Ann. Math. 37 (1936), 645–680.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I.: Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D 9 (1983), 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Babloyantz, A.: Strange attractors in the dynamics of brain activity, in H. Haken (eds.), Complex Systems-Operational Approaches in the Neurobiology and Computers, Springer, Berlin, 1985, pp. 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rapp, P.E., Zimmermann, I.D., Albano, A.M., de Guzman, G.C., Greenbaum, N.N. and Bashore, T.R.: Experimental studies of chaotic neural behavior: cellular activity and electroencephalographic signals, in H.G. Othmer (ed.), Non-linear Oscillations in Biology and Chemistry [Lectures Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 66], Springer, Berlin, 1986, pp. 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cerf, R., Daoudi, A., Khatory, A., Oumarrackchi, M., Khaider, M., Trio, J.M. and Kurtz, D.: Brain dynamics and deterministic chaos, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 311 Série II (1990), 1037–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cerf, R. and Ben Maati, M.L.: Trans-embedding-scaled dynamics, Phys. Lett. A 158 (1991), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerf, R.: Attractor-Ruled Dynamics in Neurobiology: Does it exist? Can it be measured?, in H. Haken and A. Mikhailov (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Nonlinear Complex Systems [Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 62], Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cerf, R., Oumarrackchi, M., Ben Maati, M.L. and Sefrioui, M.: Doublet-split-scaling of correlation integrals in non-linear dynamics and neurobiology, Biol. Cybernetics 68 (1992), 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cerf, R., Ould Hénoune, M., Ben Maati, M.L., El Ousdad, E.H. and Daoudi, A.: Wave separation in complex systems: Application to brain signals, J. Biol. Phys. 19 (1994), 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Soong, A.C.K. and Stuart, C.I.I.M.: Evidence of chaotic dynamics underlying the human alpharythm electroencephalogram, Biol. Cyb. 62 (1989), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jasper, H.H.: The ten-twenty system of the international federation, Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology 10 (1958), 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruelle, D.: Deterministic chaos: the science and the fiction, Proc. R. Soc. London A 427 (1990), 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Theiler, J.: Spurious dimensions from correlation algorithms applied to limited time series data, Phys. Rev. A 34 (1986), 2427–2432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cerf, R. and Ben Maati, M.L.: Attractor characterization from scaled doublet structures: simulations for small data sets, Biol. Cyb. 72 (1995), 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bellanger, M.: Traitement Numérique du Signal. Théorie et Pratique, Masson, Paris, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oppenheim, A.V. and Schaffer, R.W.: Discrete-Time Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Broomhead, D.S., Huke, J.P. and Muldoon, M.R.: Linear filters and non-linear systems, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 54 (1992), 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Theiler, J., Galdrikian, B., Longtin, S., Eubank, S. and Farmer, J.D.: Using surrogate data to detect nonlinearity in time series, in E.M. Casdagli and S. Eubank (eds.), Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting, Addison-Wesley, 1992, pp. 163–188.

  26. Pijn, J.P., van Neerven, J., Noest, A. and Lopes da Silva, F.H.: Chaos or noise in EEG signals; dependence on state and brain site, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 79 (1991), 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ould Hénoune, M. and Cerf, R.: Time reparametrization of phase trajectories as a test for attractorruled dynamics: application to electroencephalographic alpha-waves, Biol. Cyb. 73 (1995), 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasser, B., Toussaint, M., Luthringer, R. et al. Wave separation versus bandpass filtering: a comparative non-linear analysis of brain α-EEG signals with and without psychotropic drug treatment. J Biol Phys 22, 209–225 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401874

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401874

Key words

Navigation