Abstract
Attempts to demonstrate low-dimensional attractor behaviour in the analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals meet with difficulties that in part stem from a departure from single-system dynamics. In order to address this problem, the α-waves can be extracted by digital filtering or by wave separation; these two techniques are compared in order to specify the conditions in which finite impulse response (FIR) bandpass filters can be used. The comparison was made using 18 EEG records of 3 min duration under resting conditions (6 subjects, 3 records per subject: prior to apomorphine administration, then 90 min and 150 min post-treatment). No presence of low-dimensional dynamic episodes in α-signals was observed without digital processing. Sixty 5 s sections showing attractor behaviour were found after filtering and twenty five 5 s sections after wave separation. The mean correlation dimension was calculated for each experimental condition and for 4 subjects, in order to observe the temporal profile of the drug. When attractors were found after wave separation, bandpass filtering then also showed attractor behaviour, with the same temporal profile. However, the reverse is not true: attractors were found after bandpass filtering that were not present after wave separation; in this case the results deserve confirmation, although the temporal profiles for all cases in which attractors were found after filtering remained comparable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlsson, A.: The current status of dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, Neuropsychopharmacol. 1 (1988), 179–186.
Civelli, O., Bunzow, J.R. and Grandy, D.K.: Molecular diversity of the dopamine receptors, Annual Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 32 (1992), 281–307.
Honda, T., Wada, E., Dattey, J.R. and Tank, S.A.: Differential gene expression of CCKA and CCKB receptors in the rat brain, Moll. Cell. Neurosci. 4 (1993), 143–154.
Lall, S.: Apomorphine in the evaluation of dopaminergic function in man, Prog. Neuropsy-chopharmacol. Biol. Psych. 12 (1988), 117–164.
Lorenz, E.N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atm. Sci. 20 (1963), 130–141.
Ruelle, D.: Chemical kinetics and differentiable dynamic systems, in A. Pacault and C. Vidal (eds.), Nonlinear Phenomena in Chemical Dynamics [Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 12], Springer, 1981, pp. 30–37.
Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in D.A. Rand and L.S. Young (eds.), Dynamical Systems and Turbulence [Lectures Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 898], Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 366–381.
Whitney, H.: Differentiable manifolds, Ann. Math. 37 (1936), 645–680.
Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I.: Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D 9 (1983), 189–208.
Babloyantz, A.: Strange attractors in the dynamics of brain activity, in H. Haken (eds.), Complex Systems-Operational Approaches in the Neurobiology and Computers, Springer, Berlin, 1985, pp. 116–122.
Rapp, P.E., Zimmermann, I.D., Albano, A.M., de Guzman, G.C., Greenbaum, N.N. and Bashore, T.R.: Experimental studies of chaotic neural behavior: cellular activity and electroencephalographic signals, in H.G. Othmer (ed.), Non-linear Oscillations in Biology and Chemistry [Lectures Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 66], Springer, Berlin, 1986, pp. 175–205.
Cerf, R., Daoudi, A., Khatory, A., Oumarrackchi, M., Khaider, M., Trio, J.M. and Kurtz, D.: Brain dynamics and deterministic chaos, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 311 Série II (1990), 1037–1044.
Cerf, R. and Ben Maati, M.L.: Trans-embedding-scaled dynamics, Phys. Lett. A 158 (1991), 119–125.
Cerf, R.: Attractor-Ruled Dynamics in Neurobiology: Does it exist? Can it be measured?, in H. Haken and A. Mikhailov (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Nonlinear Complex Systems [Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 62], Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 201–214.
Cerf, R., Oumarrackchi, M., Ben Maati, M.L. and Sefrioui, M.: Doublet-split-scaling of correlation integrals in non-linear dynamics and neurobiology, Biol. Cybernetics 68 (1992), 115–124.
Cerf, R., Ould Hénoune, M., Ben Maati, M.L., El Ousdad, E.H. and Daoudi, A.: Wave separation in complex systems: Application to brain signals, J. Biol. Phys. 19 (1994), 223–233.
Soong, A.C.K. and Stuart, C.I.I.M.: Evidence of chaotic dynamics underlying the human alpharythm electroencephalogram, Biol. Cyb. 62 (1989), 55–62.
Jasper, H.H.: The ten-twenty system of the international federation, Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology 10 (1958), 371–375.
Ruelle, D.: Deterministic chaos: the science and the fiction, Proc. R. Soc. London A 427 (1990), 241–248.
Theiler, J.: Spurious dimensions from correlation algorithms applied to limited time series data, Phys. Rev. A 34 (1986), 2427–2432.
Cerf, R. and Ben Maati, M.L.: Attractor characterization from scaled doublet structures: simulations for small data sets, Biol. Cyb. 72 (1995), 357–363.
Bellanger, M.: Traitement Numérique du Signal. Théorie et Pratique, Masson, Paris, 1987.
Oppenheim, A.V. and Schaffer, R.W.: Discrete-Time Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.
Broomhead, D.S., Huke, J.P. and Muldoon, M.R.: Linear filters and non-linear systems, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 54 (1992), 373–382.
Theiler, J., Galdrikian, B., Longtin, S., Eubank, S. and Farmer, J.D.: Using surrogate data to detect nonlinearity in time series, in E.M. Casdagli and S. Eubank (eds.), Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting, Addison-Wesley, 1992, pp. 163–188.
Pijn, J.P., van Neerven, J., Noest, A. and Lopes da Silva, F.H.: Chaos or noise in EEG signals; dependence on state and brain site, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 79 (1991), 371–381.
Ould Hénoune, M. and Cerf, R.: Time reparametrization of phase trajectories as a test for attractorruled dynamics: application to electroencephalographic alpha-waves, Biol. Cyb. 73 (1995), 235–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gasser, B., Toussaint, M., Luthringer, R. et al. Wave separation versus bandpass filtering: a comparative non-linear analysis of brain α-EEG signals with and without psychotropic drug treatment. J Biol Phys 22, 209–225 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401874
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401874