Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seasonally fluctuating resources and temporal variability of interspecific competition

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The influence of seasonal availability of two critical resources (food and substrates from which food was harvested) on interspecific competition between striped surfperch (Embiotoca lateralis) and black surfperch (Embiotoca jacksoni) was examined. There was a strong depth-related gradient in density of prey and in cover of foliose algae; both declined with increasing bottom depth. Density of prey was reduced 5–10 fold during the winter season, but cover of substrates remained constant throughout the year. Although both fishes co-occurred throughout the same depth range, striped surfperch were more common in shallow habitats and black surfperch were more abundant deeper. Local abundance and distribution patterns of both surfperch species did not change seasonally. Stepwise regression analyses suggested that availability of favored substrates was a proximate influence on local patterns of surfperch distribution and abundance, and that interspecific competition depressed abundance of the two species to the same degree. Removal experiments conducted during the cold-water season revealed that interspecific competition influenced depth distribution of black surfperch but not striped surfperch. Seasonal change in density of prey was accompanied by marked changes in overlap in use of foraging substrates by the surfperches. The pattern of change in interspecific overlap suggested that surfperch competed for food only when prey were seasonally scarce. There was no difference in the agonistic tendencies of the two fishes, and the absolute and relative frequency of interspecific chases was independent of food level. These results have important implications regarding the impact of temporal variability of interspecific competition in natural communities. In the surfperch system, competition was characterized by constant and time-varying elements that had symmetrical and asymmetrical effects and involved both interference and exploitation mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branch GM (1984) Competition between marine organisms: ecological and evolutionary implications. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 22:429–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64:1297–1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1970) A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. J. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol Monogr 40:49–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds), Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Harvard Univ, Cambridge, pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Amer Natur 122:661–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1985) The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 93:11–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of spece in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 41:351–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1978) Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interspecific competition. Amer Sci 66:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham AE (1980) An experimental study of interspecific competition between the iguanid lizards Sceloporus merriami and Urosaurus ornatus. Ecol Monogr 50:309–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling AW, Larson RJ, Alevizon WS, Bray RN (1980) Annual variability of reef-fish assemblages in kelp forests off Santa Barbara, California. Fishery Bull 78:361–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling AW, Laur DR (1986) Foraging in surfperches: resource partitioning or individualistic responses? Envir Biol Fish 16:123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling AW, Laur DR, Rowley RJ (1985) Severe storm disturbances and reversal of community structure in a southern California kelp forest. Mar Biol 84:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P, Swarm LA (1982) “Ecological release”, seasonal variation in food supply, and the hummingbird Amazilia tobaci on Trinidad and Tobago. Ecology 63:1574–1587

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P, Spears EE, Poole RW (1981) A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1980) Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca. Ecology 61:918–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (1984) Experimental analyses of patch selection by foraging black surfperch (Embiotoca jacksoni). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 79:39–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (1986) Food acquisition by competing surfperch on a patchy environmental gradient. Envir Biol Fish 16:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ (1984) Dynamics of the epifauna of the bivalve Pinna bicolor: interactions between recruitment, predation, and competition. Ecology 65:677–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart DG, Arnold SJ (1982) Garter snake diets in a fluctuating environment: a seven year study. Ecology 63:1232–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson RJ (1977) Habitat selection and territorial competition as the causes of bathymetric segregation of sibling rockfishes (Sebastes). PhD dissertation. Univ Calif Santa Barbara

  • Larson RJ (1980) Competition, habitat selection, and bathymetric segregation of two rockfish (Sebastes) species. Ecol Monogr 50:221–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Laur DF, Ebeling AW (1983) Predator-prey relationships in a guild of surfperches. Env Biol Fish 8:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1978) Complex interactions between natural coexploiters — Daphnia and Ceriodaphnia. Ecology 59:552–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1974) A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics 30:281–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RD, Grant PR (1972) Experimental studies of competitive interaction in a two-species system. IV. Microtus and Clethrionomys species in a single enclosure. J Anim Ecol 41:275–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1981) Competition and niche theory. In: May RM (eded) Theoretical ecology. W.B. Saunders Co, pp 114–141

  • Pimm SL, Pimm JW (1982) Resource use, competition, and resource availability in Hawaiian honeycreepers. Ecology 63:1468–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JF, Dunham AE (1983) Hypothesis testing in ecology and evolution. Amer Natur 122:602–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1983) Competition and theory in community ecology. Amer Natur 122:583–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ, Toth LA (1984) Niche relationships and population ecology of rainbow (Etheostoma caeruleum) and fantail (E. flabellare) darters in a temporally variable environment. Oikos 42:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (1982) Distributions of Galapagos ground finches along an altitudinal gradient: the importance of food supply. Ecology 63:1504–1517

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ, Coyer JA (1982) The foraging ecology of sympatric marine fish in the genus Embiotoca (Embiotocidae): importance of foraging behavior in prey size selection. Oecologia 55:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ, Coyer JA (1983) Variation in surfperch diets between allopatry and sympatry: circumstantial evidence for competition. Oecologia 58:402–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (1984a) Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia 63:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (1984b) Ontogeny of prey selection by black surfperch, Embiotoca jacksoni (Pisces: Embiotocidae): the roles of fish morphology, foraging behavior, and patch selection. Mar Biol Progr Ser 18:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Amer Natur 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1985) Some comments on Connell's and my reviews of field experiments on interspecific competition. Amer Natur 125:730–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1983) Competition theory, hypothesis testing, and other community ecological buzzwords. Amer Natur 122:626–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC (1981) Competitive interactions of the striped plateau lizard (Sceloporus virgatus) and the trec lizard (Urosaurus ornatus) Ecology 62:679–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR Jr (1983) Natural variability and the manifold mechanisms of ecological communities. Amer Natur 122:636–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland JP (1978) Functional roles of Schizoporella and Styela in the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecology 59:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Denley EJ (1983) Paradigms, explanations and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In: Strong DR Jr, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ, Gilliam JF (1983) Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64:1525–1539

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1977) On competition and variable environments. Amer Sci 65:590–597

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences and the Marine Science Institute, University of California, 93106, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Russell J. Schmitt & Sally J. Holbrook

Authors
  1. Russell J. Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sally J. Holbrook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitt, R.J., Holbrook, S.J. Seasonally fluctuating resources and temporal variability of interspecific competition. Oecologia 69, 1–11 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399030

Keywords

Search

Navigation