Abstract
This paper examines the spread and development of ‘environmental impact assessment’ (EIA) since the enactment of the U.S. Environmental Policy Act on January 1, 1970, which established for the first time under any jurisdiction the formal requirement that an EIA be made and that an ‘environmental impact statement’ (EIS) be filed prior to implementation of certain major development projects.
The paper is divided into three parts. In the first part, we briefly review the forms of EIA introduced in the western industrial countries and contrast these with developments in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe, and in the Third World. The approaches to EIA adopted by five countries — the United States, Australia, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the Soviet Union — are used to illustrate the types of national approaches that have been followed. In the second part of the paper, we use some questions raised by impact assessments as codified in legislation or regulations at the national level to highlight some of the limitations of impact assessment. Finally, we turn to international impact assessments and describe the modest progress made to date. Key impediments to the development of appropriate conceptual and institutional frameworks and methodologies for international EIAs are noted.
In conclusion, we offer some suggestions about needed actions at both the national and international levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AshbyE.: 1979, Reconciling Man with the Environment, Stanford University Press, Stanford, U.S.A., 104 p.
Bass, R. and Warner, S.: 1979, ‘Streamlining NEPA: A Look at the Council on Environmental Quality's New EIS Regulations’, Environmental Comment (August): 14–19.
CarpenterR. A.: 1980, Using Ecological Knowledge for Development Planning’, Environmental Management 4(1), 13–20.
Economic Commission for Europe: 1979, Seminar on Environmental Impact Assessment, Villach, Austria, Pergamon Press (in press).
FairfaxS. K.: 1978, ‘A Disaster in the Environmental Movement’, Science 199, 743–748.
GoldmanM. I.: 1972, The Spoils of Progress: Environmental Pollution in the Soviet Union, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 373 p.
HollickM.: 1980, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia. The Federal Experience’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1(3), 330–336.
JonesM. G.: 1980, ‘Developing an EIA process for the Netherlands’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1(2), 167–180.
KennedyW. V.: 1980, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1(1), 92–94.
LeeN. and WoodC.: 1980, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment in the European Economic Community’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1(3), 287–300.
MunnR. E. (ed.): 1979a, Environmental Impact Assessment, John Wiley, Chichester, England, 190 pp. (SCOPE 5, 2nd edition).
MunnR. E. (ed.): 1979b, ‘Stratosphere Ozone Depletion: An Environmental Impact Assessment’, in A. K.Biswas (ed.), The Ozone Layer, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, pp. 211–243.
PushchakR. and WilsonJ. P.: 1981, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment for Urban Natural Areas’, in W. A.Andrews and J. L.Crammer-Byng (eds.), Urban Natural Areas: Ecology and Preservation, Toronto, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, pp. 73–90.
Wandesforde-SmithG.: 1980, ‘International Perspectives on Environmental Impact Assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1(1), 53–64.
WhyteA. V. T. and BurtonI. (eds.): 1980, Environmental Risk Assessment, John Wiley, Chichester, England, 157 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, I., Wilson, J. & Munn, R.E. Environmental impact assessment: National approaches and international needs. Environ Monit Assess 3, 133–150 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398843
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398843