Skip to main content
Log in

Quality assurance and quality control data validation procedures used for the Love Canal and Dallas lead soil monitoring programs

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public awareness of soils contamination has increased in recent years due in part to the notoriety associated with the indiscriminate release, packaging, transporting and disposal of hazardous materials. In 1980, and again in 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was responsible for designing, implementing and conducting environmental monitoring programs at Love Canal in Niagara Falls, New York, and in Dallas, Texas, that dealt with suspected contaminated soils. Both of these monitoring programs were conducted over a relatively short time with the collection and analysis of over 4000 soil samples. The methods employed by the Environmental Protection Agency for providing soil data that was scientifically valid and of defensible quality for each of these monitoring programs are presented. Also, methods for identifying data bias, its precision and its uncertainty are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BrownK. W., BeckertW. F., BlackS. C., FlatmanG. T., MullinsJ. W., RichittE. P., and SimonS. J.: 1983, ‘The Dallas Lead Monitoring Study: EMSL-LV Contribution’, EPA-600/X-83-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • KoppJ. F. and McKeeG. D.: 1978, ‘Method for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes’, EPA-600/4-79-020, Enviromental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • MasonB. J.: 1982, ‘Preparation of Soil Sampling Protocol: Techniques and Strategies’, U.S. ESA Report in Final Review, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan: 1982, ‘Federal Register, Vol. 47, No. 137, Rules and Regulation’, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • NatrellaM. G.: 1963, ‘Experimental Statistics, NBS Handbook 91’, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, G. E.: 1982, ‘Aassessing Soil Contamination at Love Canal’, published in Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1982, ‘Environmental Monitoring at Love Canal, Volume 1’, EPA-600/4-82-030a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, K.W., Black, S.C. Quality assurance and quality control data validation procedures used for the Love Canal and Dallas lead soil monitoring programs. Environ Monit Assess 3, 113–122 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398841

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398841

Keywords

Navigation