Skip to main content
Log in

Niche use patterns among some Stenodemini (Heteroptera: Miridae) of limestone grassland, and an investigation of the possibility of interspecific competition between Notostira elongata Geoffroy and Megaloceraea recticornis Geoffroy

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It was suggested in a previous paper that mortality patterns in two species of Stenodemini (M. recticornis and N. elongata) could be explained by interspecific competition (Gibson 1976a)

Such competition would have been generated by seasonal changes in the foodplants used by the two species resulting in both species using virtually the same range of plants at one time of year.

As with a number of phytophagous insects (McNeill and Southwood 1978) many changes in foodplant use could be explained by differential seasonal changes in nitrogen content of the plant part (leaves) that the bugs were using in different plant species. Each bug had an ideal food nitrogen range which it used whenever possible. Lack of fit to this mechanism could often be explained by defensive chemistry and physical properties of some grass species.

Although the total bug population was taking under 1% of the area's primary production, a potential refuge foodplant for one bug species was very heavily eaten where it was rare, and behavioural interference between bug species suggested that space to feed in was a limiting resource.

Laboratory and semi-field culture experiments showed that the presence of one bug species adversely affected the growth and/or survival of the other, although the outcome of competition was different to that in the field, probably due to the different relative and absolute densities used.

Although one cannot be completely certain without field manipulation experiments, it is extremely likely that interspecific competition was occurring and could be stabilised by the losing species (N. elongata) having a ‘refuge generation’.

Competition between stenodemine species on the study area could usually be avoided by separation along a number of resource axes e.g. foodplant species, plant part, nitrogen level of food or emergence timing. In the present circumstance, a particular combination of bug and plant species in the area has forced one species pair into overlap. It should be possible to predict the guild structure and competition relations in other areas from this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen SE (ed) (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala FJ (1971) Competition between species — frequency dependence. Science NY 171:820–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch GM (1976) Interspecific competition experienced by South African Patella species. J Anim Ecol 45:507–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie AC (1946) Further experiments in insect competition. Proc Roy Soc B vol 133:76–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolling WR (1973) Photoperiodically determined phase production and diapause termination in Notostira elongata Geoffroy (Hemiptera: Miridae). Ent Gazette 23, no 1: 75–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffey E, Morris MG, Sheail J, Ward LK, Wells DA, Wells TCE (1974) Grassland ecology and wildlife management. Chapman Hall

  • Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Baltimore

  • Gibson CWD (1976a) The importance of foodplants for the distribution and abundance of some Stenodemini (Heteroptera: Miridae) of limestone grassland. Oecologia (Berl) 25:55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • (976b) The biology of Heteroptera associated with Tor grass; Brachy-podium pinnatum L. D Phil thesis. University of Oxford

  • Gilpin ME, Ayala FJ (1976) Schoener's model and Drosophila competition. Theo Popul Biol 9:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JO, Corrall AJ, Terry RA (1971) Grass species and varieties: Relationships between stage of growth, yield and forage quality. G.R.I., Hurley, Technical Rept no 8

  • Hutchinson GE (1959) “Homage to Santa Rosalia” or “Why are there so many kinds of animals?” Am Nat 93:145–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Strong DR (1980) Community patterns and competition in phytophagous insects. In review

  • May RM (1976) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Monographs in Population Biology no 6. Princeton. Theoretical ecology; principles and application. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RS (1967) Pattern and process in competition. Adv Ecol Res 4:1–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MG (1969) Differences between the invertebrate faunas of grazed and ungrazed chalk grassland. III: the Heteropterous fauna. J Appl Ecol 6:475–87 Responses of grassland invertebrates to management by cutting. J Appl Ecol 16 no 2:417–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill S (1969) A study of the population and energy ecology of some Stenodemini (Miridae). Ph D thesis. University of London

  • McNeill S (1971) The energetics of a population of Leptopterna dolabrata (Heteroptera: Miridae). J Anim Ecol 40:127–40. The dynamics of a population of Leptopterna dolabrata (Heteroptera: Miridae) in relation to its food resources. J Anim Ecol 42:495–507

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill S, Southwood TRE (1978) The role of nitrogen in the development of insect/plant relationships. In: Harborne JB (ed) Biochemical aspects of plant and animal coevolution. Proc Phytochemical Society Symposium no 15 (1977) Academic Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne EJ (1975) A rapid method for assessing total nitrogen in herbage. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 41:135–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1973) Intertidal community structure; experimental studies on relationships between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia (Berl)15:93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrusewicz K, Macfadyen A (1967) Productivity of terrestrial animals: principles and methods. IBP Handbook no 13. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson J (1966) Ecological energetics. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke BJ (1976) Competition and coexistence within a guild of herbivorous insects. Ecology 57:76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson TB, Bellamy LS (1970) The establishment of interspecific competition in field populations with an example of competition in action between Polycelis nigra (Mull) and P. tenuis (Ijima). (Turbellaria: Tricladida). Proc Adv Stud Inst Dyn Numbers Popul (Oosterbeek) (1970):282–97

  • Seifert RP, Seifert FH (1979) A Heliconia insect community in a Venezuelan cloud forest. Ecology 60, no 3:462–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1966) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE, Leston D (1959) Land and water bugs of the British Isles. Warne London

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V (1926) Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in species animali conviventi. Mem Acad Lincei Roma 2:31–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1979) Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60 no 2 256–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson P (1974) The feeding ecology and energetics of a grassland population of the snail Cepaea nemoralis L. Ph D thesis. Portsmouth Polytechnic

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, C.W.D. Niche use patterns among some Stenodemini (Heteroptera: Miridae) of limestone grassland, and an investigation of the possibility of interspecific competition between Notostira elongata Geoffroy and Megaloceraea recticornis Geoffroy. Oecologia 47, 352–364 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398529

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398529

Keywords

Navigation