Summary
Application of either CFM or TIBA to bean plants caused four main effects: (i) inhibition of main shoot and leaf growth; (ii) abscission of young leaflets and internodes; (iii) limited outgrowth of lateral buds below the point of application of the substances followed by abscission of these buds; (iv) abscission of all other lateral buds. Although the chemical pruning effects of CFM and TIBA may be the result of their action in blocking auxin transport, the use of these substances for analysing auxin effects in apical dominance is questionable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kraus, E. J., Mitchell, J. W.: Growth-regulating substances as herbicides. Bot. Gaz. 108, 301–350 (1947).
Krelle, E., Libbert, E.: Inhibition of the polar auxin transport by a morphactin. Planta (Berl.) 80, 317–320 (1968).
Niedergang-Kamien, E., Skoog, F.: Studies on polarity and auxin transport in plants. 1. Modification of polarity and auxin transport by triiodobenzoic acid. Physiol. Plantarum (Cph.) 11, 60–73 (1956).
Phillips, J. D. J.: Apical dominance. In: The physiology of plant growth and development, p. 163–202 (M. B. Wilkins, ed.), London: McGraw-Hill 1969.
Whiting, A. G., Murray, M. A.: Abscission and other responses induced by 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid in bean plants. Bot. Gaz. 109, 447–473 (1948).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
White, J.C., Hillman, J.R. On the use of morphactin and triiodobenzoic acid in apical dominance studies. Planta 107, 257–260 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397941
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397941