Skip to main content
Log in

Clam predation by whelks (Busycon spp.): Experimental tests of the importance of prey size, prey density, and seagrass cover

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 57 l-m2 samples within a meadow of Halodule wrightii in Bogue Sound, North Carolina, USA, densities of the clams Mercenaria mercenaria and Chione cancellata were positively associated with seagrass cover. Where seagrass was experimentally removed, marked individuals of both clam species exhibited high rates of mortality in fine sand sediments during two successive experiments spanning 13 months. In the unaltered (control) seagrass meadow, M. mercenaria density remained constant over 13 months and C. cancellata density declined at a slower rate than in the unvegetated plots. Seagrass provides these clams with a refuge from whelk (Busycon carica, B. contrarium, and B. canaliculatum) predation, the major cause of mortality and population decline in experimentally unvegetated plots. In 2 factorial field experiments in unvegetated substratum in which densities of M. mercenaria and C. cancellata were varied independently, first over 5 levels (0 X, 1/2X, 1 X, 2 X, 4 X) and subsequently over 4 levels (0 X, 1/4 X, 1 X, 4 X), there was no repeatable intra- or interspecific effect of density on percent survival, or on the rate of any mortality type. Whelk predation fell preferentially on larger size classes of both species, whereas factors which contribute to clam disappearance usually acted more intensely on smaller sizes. Experimental exclusion of large predators by caging demonstrated that even in unvegetated substratum survivorship of both clam species was high in the absence of whelks and other predators. Individuals of C. cancellata live closer to the sediment surface than those of M. mercenaria, which may explain why seagrass does not serve as effectively to protect them from whelk predation. The mechanism of whelk inhibition may depend upon sediment binding by the H. wrightii root mat, which produces a demonstrable decrease in the physical penetrability of surface sediments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Au, S.: Vegetation and ecological processes on Shackleford Bank, North Carolina, 86 pp. U.S. National Park Service Scientific Monographs, no. 6 1974

  • Carriker, M. R.: Observations on the penetration of tightly closing bivalves by Busycon and other predators. Ecology 32, 73–83 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R.: The role of physical and biological factors in the culture of Crassostrea and Mercenaria in a salt-water pond. Ecol. Monogr. 29, 219–266 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H.: A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol. Monogr. 40, 49–78 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H.: On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Proc. Adv. Study Inst., Dyn. Numbers Pop. 1970, 298–312 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K.: Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L.: Petrology of sedimentary rocks. 2nd ed. 182 pp. Austin: Hemphill Publishing Company 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G. F.: The struggle for existence, 163 pp. New York: Hafner 1934

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, R. M. and H. A. Lowenstam: The influence of marine bottom communities on the depositional environment of the sediments. J. Geol. 66, 310–318 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S.: The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European Pine Sawfly. Can. Ent. 91, 293–320 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, C. B.: Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landers, W. S.: Notes on the predation of the hard clam, Venus mercenaria, by the mud crab, Neopanope texana Ecology 35, 442 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill, L. S.: Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 54, 1320–1327 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes, H.: An ecological study of snails of the genus Busycon at Beaufort, North Carolina Ecol. Monogr. 18, 377–409 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A.: Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol. Monogr. 46, 355–393 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A. and J. Lubchenco: Community organization in temperate and tropical rocky intertidal habitats: prey refuges in relation to consumer pressure gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 51, (1981)

  • Murdoch, W. W. and A. Oaten: Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 12, 1–125 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, A. C.: Sediment processing in a marine subtidal sandy bottom community: I. Physical aspects. J. mar. Res. 35, 609–632 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J.: The importance of sediment stability in seagrass communities. In: Ecology of marine benthos, pp 281–300. Ed. by B. C. Coull. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T.: Ecological diversification in sympatric gastropods of the genus Busycon. Evol. 16, 515–523 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T.: Trophic relationships of 8 sympatric predatory gastropods. Ecology 44, 63–73 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T.: Intertidal community structure. Experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15, 93–120 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H.: The importance of predation and competition in organizing the intertidal epifaunal communities of Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey. Oecologia 39, 1–24 (1979a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H.: Predation, competitive exclusion, and diversity in the soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons. In: Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems, pp 233–264. Ed. by R. J. Livingston. New York: Plenum Press 1979b

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K.: Predation pressure and community structure of an intertidal soft-bottom fauna. In: Biology of benthic organisms, pp 513–519. Ed. by B. F. Keegan, P. O. Ceidigh, P. J. S. Boaden, New York: Pergamon Press 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K.: Experiments on epibenthic predation in the Wadden Sea. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 31, 55–101 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, G. R.: Effects of predation by fishes, competition, and structural complexity of the substratum on the establishment of a marine epifaunal community. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 42, 55–69 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, S. L. and J. L. Simon: Distribution and abundance of the polychaetous annelids in a South Florida estuary. Bull. mar. Sci. 24, 669–689 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran: Statistical methods. Sixth ed. 593 pp. Ames: Iowa State University Press 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A. W.: The role of seagrass biomass in the organization of benthic macrofaunal assemblages. Bull. mar. Sci. 30, 537–551 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchanek, T. H.: The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. in exposed rocky intertidal communities. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 31, 105–120 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerson, H. C.: The effects of predation on the marine benthic invertebrate community in and around a shallow subtidal seagrass bed, 118 pp. M.S. thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1980

  • Sutherland, J. P. and R. H. Karlson: Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecol. Monogr. 47, 425–446 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G. W., S. M. Adams and M. W. LaCroix: Structural and functional aspects of a recently established Zostera marina community. In: Estuarine research, Vol. I. Chemistry, biology and the estuarine system, pp 518–540. Ed. by L. E. Cronin. New York: Academic Press 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij, G. J.: Biogeography and adaptation: Patterns of marine life, 332 pp. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W.: The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology 58, 1199–1217 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodin, S. A.: Refuges, disturbance and community structure: a marine soft-bottom example. Ecology 59, 274–284 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. K., M. A. Buzas and M. W. Young: Species densities of macrobenthos associated with seagrasses: a field experimental study of predation. J. mar. Res. 34, 577–592 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Lawrence, Tampa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, C.H. Clam predation by whelks (Busycon spp.): Experimental tests of the importance of prey size, prey density, and seagrass cover. Mar. Biol. 66, 159–170 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397189

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397189

Keywords

Navigation