Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 243–249 | Cite as

Filter-feeding ethology of benthic invertebrates (ascidians). IV. Pumping rate, filtration rate, filtration efficiency

  • A. Fiala-Médioni
Article

Abstract

A combination of a direct and an indirect method has been used for the first time in the study of filter-feeding in benthic invertebrates. Experiments over 12 h periods under constant temperature, pH, light and feeding conditions have been carried out with 3 species of ascidians: Ciona intestinalis (Linné, 1767); Phallusia mammillata (Cuvier, 1815) and Styela plicata (Lesueur, 1823). In C. intestinalis and P. mammillata, no pumping rhythm has been found; the water flow was constant for 12 h, except for some brief accidental interruptions. In S. plicata, the particular rhythm of spontaneous periodical contractions recorded during the experiment were related to gamete emission. The speed of water flow, which was fairly constant during recording, varied considerably during the 12 h period; these variations were generally related to modifications in the diameter of the cloacal siphon. The average speeds, in cm sec-1, lay between 5.7 and 9.5 for C. intestinalis, 5.2 and 19.4 for P. mammillata, and between 5.3 and 10.7 for S. plicata. Variations in the pumping-rate were small, oscillating around a mean value. In ml h-1 g-1 dry weight of organs these were 5,829 to 5,982 (mean=5,906) for C. intestinalis, 6,142 to 6,592 (mean=6,312) for P. mammillata, 1,0508 to 1,1505 (mean=1,0708) for S. plicata. Filtration was continuous without any particular rhythm; filtration rates in ml h-1 g-1 dry weight of organs varied between 4,244 and 4,418 (mean=4,331) for C. intestinalis, 4,620 and 4,960 (mean=4,779) for P. mammillata, 8,482 and 9,078 (mean=8,760) for S. plicata. The curves representing pumping and filtration were clearly parallel, indicating that filtration efficiency did not vary greatly during the course of an experiment; the rates obtained were 65 to 87% (mean=74%) for C. intestinalis, 66 to 88% (mean 76%) for P. mammillata, and 73 to 90% (mean=80%) for S. plicata. The slightly higher mean value in S. plicata is probably related to the higher complexity of the branchial apparatus of this species.

Keywords

Filtration Constant Temperature Water Flow Filtration Rate Indirect Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Carlisle, D.B.: The ciliary current of Phallusia and the squirting of sea squirts. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 46, 125–127 (1966)Google Scholar
  2. Collis, D.C. and M.J. Williams: Two dimensional convection from heated wires at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 357–384 (1959)Google Scholar
  3. Coughlan, J. and A.D. Ansell: A direct method for determining the pumping rate of siphonate bivalves. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 29, 205–213 (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Davids, C.: The influence of suspensions of micro-organisms of different concentrations on the pumping and retention of food by the mussel (Mytilus edulis L.). Neth. J. Sea Res. 2, 233–249 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. Ezraty, R.: Sur la mesure de caractéristiques turbulentes dans les écoulements d'eau, 78 pp. Thèse Doctorat, 3° cycle, Université Aix-Marseille 1970Google Scholar
  6. Fiala-Médioni, A.: Ethologie alimentaire d'invertébrés benthiques filtreurs (ascidies). I. Dispositif expérimental. Taux de filtration et de digestion chez Phallusia mammillata. Mar. Biol. 23, 137–145 (1973)Google Scholar
  7. —: Ethologie alimentaire d'invertébrés benthiques filtreurs (ascidies). II. Variation des taux de filtration et de digestion en fonction de l'espèce. Mar. Biol. 28, 199–206 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. —: Filter-feeding ethology of benthic invertebrates (ascidians). III. Recording of water current in situ-rate and rhythm of pumping. Mar. Biol. 45, 185–190 (1978)Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg, E.D., W. MacBlair and K.M. Taylor: The uptake of vanadium by tunicates. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 101, 81–94 (1951)Google Scholar
  10. Goodbody, I. and E.R. Trueman: Observation on the hydraulics of Ascidia. Nature, Lond. 224, 85–86 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. Gosselin, R.E. and G. O'Hara: An unsuspected source of error in studies of particle transport by lamellibranch gill cilia. J. cell. Physiol. 58, 1–9 (1961)Google Scholar
  12. Haven, D.S. and R. Morales-Alamo: Filtration of particles from suspension by the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull., mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 139, 248–264 (1970)Google Scholar
  13. Hecht, S.: The water current produced by Ascidia atra Lesueur. J. exp. Zool. 20, 429–434 (1916)Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, N.: Water transport in the ascidians Styela clava Herdman and Ascidiella aspersa (Müller). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 11, 1–13 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. Hoyle, G.: Spontaneous squirting of an ascidian Phallusia mammillata Cuvier. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 31, 541–562 (1953)Google Scholar
  16. Jørgensen, C.B.: Feeding rates of sponges, lamellibranchs and ascidians. Nature, Lond. 163, p. 912 (1949)Google Scholar
  17. —: On the relation between water transport and food requirements in some marine filter feeding invertebrates. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 103, 356–363 (1952)Google Scholar
  18. —: Quantitative aspects of filter feeding in invertebrates. Biol. Rev. 30, 391–454 (1955)Google Scholar
  19. —: Efficiency of particle retention and rate of water transport in undisturbed lamellibranchs. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 26, 94–116 (1960)Google Scholar
  20. —: Biology of suspension feeding. Int. Ser. Monogr. pure appl. Biol. (Zoology) 27, 1–357 (1966)Google Scholar
  21. Loosanoff, V.L. and J.B. Engle: Effect of different concentrations of micro-organisms on the feeding of oysters (O. virginea). Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 42, 31–57 (1947)Google Scholar
  22. MacCammon, H.M.: Behaviour in the brachiopod Terebratulina septentrionalis (Couthouy). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 6, 35–45 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. Magenham, J.C.: Loi de comportement d'un film chaud en régime quasi-isotherme. Vie Milieu (1978). (In press)Google Scholar
  24. Mathäus, W.: Die Viskosität des Meerwassers. Beitr. Meeresk. 29, 93–101 (1972)Google Scholar
  25. Tammes, P.M.L. and D.G. Dral: Observations on the straining of suspensions by mussels. Arch. néerl. Zool. 11, 87–112 (1955)Google Scholar
  26. Vahl, C.: Efficiency of particle retention in Mytilus edulis L. Ophelia 10, 17–25 (1972)Google Scholar
  27. Wells, G.P. and R.P. Dales: Spontaneous activity patterns in animal behaviour: the irrigation of the burrow in the polychaetes Chaeptopterus variopedatus Renier and Nereis diversicolor O.F. Müller. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 29, 661–680 (1951)Google Scholar
  28. Willemsen, J.: Quantities of water pumped by mussels (Mytilus edulis) and cockles (Cardium edule). Archs néerl. Zool. 10, 152–160 (1952)Google Scholar
  29. Winter, J.E.: Über den Einfluß der Nahrungskonzentration und anderer Faktoren auf Filtrierleistung und Nahrungsausnutzung der Muscheln Arctica islandica und Modiolus modiolus. Mar. Biol. 4, 87–135 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Fiala-Médioni
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire AragoUniversité Paris VIBanyuls-sur-MerFrance

Personalised recommendations