Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Indirect speech: A rejoinder to Prof. A. N. Prior

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. N. Prior. “Indirect Speech Again,”Philosophical Studies, this issue.

  2. L. Jonathan Cohen. “Why Do Cretans Have to Say So Much?”Philosophical Studies, 12: 72–78 (October 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. N. Prior. “Epimenides the Cretan,”Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23: 261–66 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Jonathan Cohen. “Can the Logic of Indirect Discourse Be Formalised?”Journal of Symbolic Logic, 22:225–32 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Carnap.Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947. Pp. 83ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Jonathan Cohen.The Diversity of Meaning. London: Methuen, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queen's College, Oxford

    L. Jonathan Cohen

Authors
  1. L. Jonathan Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, L.J. Indirect speech: A rejoinder to Prof. A. N. Prior. Philos Stud 14, 15–18 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396666

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396666

Keywords

Search

Navigation