Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relevance of radiation compensation litigation to compensation for toxic exposures

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several recent court decisions add to the growing body of law concerning the responsibility of Government in radiation matters and the quantum of proof needed to show causation between radiation exposures and certain types of cancer and leukemia. The courts have also been addressing a wide range of compensation claims for exposures to toxic chemicals with demonstration of causation being a particularly difficult task. Meanwhile, the Congress has been attempting to legislate a far reaching administrative and judicial framework for compensating toxic victims, including an easing of burden-of-proof requirements for demonstrating causation and a broadening of the basis for admissibility of scientific evidence. Drawing parallels between radiation and toxic exposure problems can be both instructive and misleading. Some of the technical issues are quite similar, including the importance of person-specific exposure estimates and of epidemiological studies. However, the uncertainties associated with toxic exposures are usually far greater, and the scientific data base for relating exposures and effects is much more uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jenkins, Bruce, S., ‘Irene Allen et al., Plaintiffs, vs United States of America, Defendant’, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Civil No. C 79-0515-J, May 9, 1984. 489 pp.

  2. Foley, Roger, D., “Dorothy Roberts et al., Plaintiffs, vs United States of America, Defendant; and Louise Nunamaker, Plaintiff, vs United States of America, Defendant‘, United States District Court, District of Nevada, Civil LV 1766 RDF and Civil LV 76-259 RDF, June 14, 1984. 118 pp.

  3. Kelly, Patrick, F., ‘Ada G. Johnston, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Earl E. Johnston. Deceased, Plaintiff, vs The United States of America et al., Defendants: Barbara J. Womack, and Loyd B. Womack, Plaintiffs, vs The United States of America et al., Defendants, Estella I. Vessels, Individually, and as Executrix of the Estate of Don C. Vessels, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs The United States of America et al., Defendants, Lila M. Mewhinney and Richard M. Mewhenney, Plaintiffs, vs The United States of America et al., Defendants’, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, No. 81-1060; No. 81-1061, 82-1537; No. 81-1100, 82-1539; No. 81-1101, 82-1538, November 15, 1984. 150 pp.

  4. Orphan Drug Act, Public Law 97-414, January 4, 1983.

  5. See, for example, S. 921, Radiogenic Cancer Compensation Act of 1983 (proposed), March 24, 1983.

  6. Injuries and Damages from Hazardous Wastes — Analysis and Improvement of Legal Remedies, A Report to Congress on Compliance with Section 301(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-510) by the Superfund Section 301(e) Study Group. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 97th Congress, 2d Session. September 1982. 755 pp.

  7. Hazardous Substance Victims Compensation Legislation. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation, and Tourism of the Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R. 2582, Serial No. 98-45, June 29, 1983.

  8. ‘Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Producs’, Hazardous Waste and Toxic Torts: Regulation, Enforcement, Liability. Law Journal Seminars-Press, Inc. (1983) p. 328.

  9. Pacht, Jerry and Robert I. Weil, ‘Judith Sindell, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants and Respondents; Maureen Rogers, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Rexall Drug Company et al., Defendants and Respondents’, Supreme Court of California, 26 C.3d 588, March 20, 1980; Rehg. den. May 7, 1980.

  10. ‘Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America’, Hazardous Waste and Toxic Torts: Regulation, Enforcement, Liability, Law Journal Seminars-Press, Inc. (1983) p. 232.

  11. ‘Branch v. Western Petroleum’, Hazardous Waste and Toxic Torts: Regulation, Enforcement, Liability, Law Journal Seminars-Press, Inc. (1983) pp. 269–278.

  12. ‘Beshada v. Johns-Mansville Products Corp.’, Hazardous Waste and Toxic Torts: Regulation, Enforcement, Liability, Law Journal Seminars-Press, Inc. (1983) pp. 232.

  13. Six Case Studies of Compensation for Toxic Substances Pollution: Alabama, California, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and Texas, A Report for the Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate. June 1980. Serial No. 96-13. 521 pp.

  14. Tribe, Laurence H., ‘Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in Legal Process’, Harvard Law Review 84(6), 1329–1393, April 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado, Richard, ‘Beyond Sindell: Relaxation of Cause-In-Fact Rules for Indeterminate Plaintiffs’, California Law Review 70(4), 881–908, July 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strand, Palma J., ‘The Inapplicability of Traditional Tort Analysis to Environmental Risks: The Example of Toxic Waste Pollution Victim Compensation’, Stanford Law Review 35, 575–619, February 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Policy Studies, Environmental Research Center, University of Nevada at Las Vegas, USA

    Glenn E. Schweitzer

Authors
  1. Glenn E. Schweitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schweitzer, G.E. Relevance of radiation compensation litigation to compensation for toxic exposures. Environ Monit Assess 8, 1–10 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396603

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396603

Keywords

Search

Navigation