Summary
A number of differences in the responses of ‘Great Lakes’ lettuce seedlings to blue and far-red light indicate that more than one photo-sensitive pigment is involved in the photo-inhibition of hypocotyl elongation under ‘highenergy’ conditions. In far-red light the inhibitory effect is restricted to young seedlings and is of limited duration; after 24 hours in far-red a rapid growth rate similar to that of plants maintained in darkness is resumed, despite continued irradiation. The onset of inhibition is relatively slow. Blue light, in contrast, exerts a strongly inhibitory effect on elongation at any age, and a slow rate of growth persists throughout the entire irradiation period. The onset of inhibition is very rapid. Furthermore, even when the inhibition in far-red had already been exhausted after prolonged exposure, transfer to blue light resulted in a prompt reduction in growth rate. Also the effect of far-red is almost completely lost after a pre-irradiation with red light which does not affect the response to blue. It is concluded that the responses to blue and far-red light in ‘Great Lakes’ lettuce are not mediated by a single pigment system and that a distinct blue-sensitive pigment is present in addition to phytochrome.
Red light has a number of different effects depending on conditions: (1) a pretreatment with red light almost completely prevents the inhibitory effect of a subsequent far-red irradiation, (2) a brief terminal treatment with red increases the inhibitory effect of either far-red or blue light; this is reversed by far-red, and (3) prolonged exposure to red light given alone increases the growth rate relative to darkness, because the more rapid elongation rate characteristic of young seedlings continues for longer with red light than in plants grown in darkness throughout.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engelsma, G.: Photoinduction of phenylalanine deaminase in gherkin seedlings II. Effect of red and far-red light. Planta (Berl.) 77, 49–57 (1967).
—: The influence of light of different spectral regions on the synthesis of phenolic compounds in gherkin seedlings in relation to photomorphogenesis. Acta bot. neerl. 14, 54–92 (1965).
Evans, L. T., S. B. Hendricks, and H. A. Borthwick: The role of light in suppressing hypocotyl elongation in lettuce and Petunia. Planta (Berl.) 64, 201–218 (1965).
Fondeville, J. C., M. J. Schneider, H. A. Borthwick, and S. B. Hendricks: Photocontrol of Mimosa pudica L. leaf movement. Planta (Berl.) 75, 228–238 (1967).
Grill, R.: Photocontrol of anthocyanin formation in turnip seedlings I. Demonstration of phytochrome action. Planta (Berl.) 66, 293–300 (1965).
—: Photocontrol of anthocyanin formation in turnip seedlings II. The possible role of phytochrome in the response to prolonged irradiation with far-red or blue light. Planta (Berl.) 67, 122–135 (1965).
Hartmann, K. M.: A general hypothesis to interpret ‘High Energy Phenomena’ of photomorphogenesis on the basis of phytochrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 5, 349–366 (1966).
—: Ein Wirkungsspektrum der Photomorphogenese unter Hochenergiebedingungen und seine Interpretation auf der Basis des Phytochroms (Hypokotylwachstums-hemmung bei Lactuca sativa L.). Z. Naturforsch. 22, 1172–1175 (1967).
Heath, O. V. S., and D. Vince: Some non-photosynthetic effects of light on higher plants with special reference to wavelength. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 16, 110–137 (1962).
Jacques, R.: Étude par spectrophotométrie in vivo de quelques propriétés nouvelles du phytochrome. Physiol. Vég. 6, 93–116 (1968).
Köhler, D.: Die Abhängigkeit der Gibberellinproduktion von Normalerbsen vom Phytochrom-system. Planta (Berl.) 69, 27–33 (1966).
Lane, H. C., and M. J. Kasperbauer: Photomorphogenic responses of dodder seedlings. Plant Physiol. 40, 109–116 (1965).
Meijer, G.: Rapid growth inhibition of gherkin hypocotyls in blue light. Acta bot. neerl. 17, 9–14 (1968).
Mohr, H.: The control of plant growth and development by light. Biol. Rev. 39, 87–112 (1964).
—: Die Steuerung des Hypokotylwachstums bei den Keimlingen von Lactuca sativa L. durch sichtbare Strahlung. Planta (Berl.) 55, 438–450 (1960).
Pratt, L. H., and W. R. Briggs: Photochemical and non-photochemical reactions of phytochrome in vivo. Plant Physiol. 41, 467–474 (1966).
Rollin, P.: Influence de la lumière sur la morphogenèse des végétaux. Ann. Biol. 3, 95–135 (1964).
Schneider, M. J., H. A. Borthwick, and S. B. Hendricks: Effects of radiation on flowering of Hyoscyamus niger. Amer. J. Bot. 54, 1241–1249 (1967).
Vince, D., and R. Grill: The photoreceptors involved in anthocyanin synthesis. Photochem. Photobiol. 5, 407–411 (1966).
Wagner, E., and H. Mohr: Kinetic studies to interpret ‘High-energy phenomena’ of photomorphogenesis on the basis of phytochrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 5, 397–406 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, M.R., Vince, D. Photosensory mechanisms in the lettuce seedling hypocotyl. Planta 84, 368–382 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396429
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396429