Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of ambient Air Quality Monitoring Networks

(Part III)

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The methodologies presented in Parts I and II (refer Modak and Lohani, 1984a and b) are essentially for deciding the best number and configuration for a single pollutant monitor. In practical situations however, Air Quality Monitoring Networks (AQMN) are expected to measure more than one pollutant and therefore simultaneous consideration of different types of pollutants must be made.

In this paper, two new approaches have been developed for the multipollutant AQMN design. The first method makes use of the index theory and the other makes use of the principles of Pareto optimality. As an illustration of these methodologies, an example from Taipei City, Taiwan is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brady, P. J.: 1978, ‘Optimal Sampling and Analysis Using Two Variables and Modelled Cross-Covariance Functions’, Journal of Applied Meteorology 17, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, W. P., Ossenbruggen, P. J., and Gregory, C. J.: 1974, ‘Optimization of Urban Air Monitoring Networks’, Journal of Environmental Engineering Division, A.S.C.E. 100, EE3, 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T. R.: 1980, ‘A Study of the Spatial Variability of Ozone and other Pollutants at St. Louis, Missouri’, Atmospheric Environment 14, 681–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. H.: 1966, ‘An Air Pollution Index Based on Sulphur Dioxide and the Smoke Shade’, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 11, 703–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handscombe, C. M. and Elsom, D. M.: 1982, ‘Rationalization of the National Survey of Air Pollution Monitoring Networks Using Spatial Correlation Analysis — A Case Study of the Greater London Area’, Atmospheric Environment 16, 1061–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S. R.: 1982, ‘Natural Variability of Observed Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide Concentrations in St. Louis’, Atmospheric Environment 16, 1061–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, H. R., Rowe, W. D., and Skinner, F.: 1971, ‘A Cost Model for the Air Quality Monitoring System’, Journal of Air Pollution Control Association 21, 689–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, P. M.: 1984, ‘Optimum Siting of Ambient Air Monitors’, A dissertation submitted as the partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, P. M. and Lohani, B. N.: 1983, ‘Vector Mapping of Ambient Air Quality’, submitted to Journal of Air Pollution Control Association, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, P. M. and Lohani, B. N.: 1984a, ‘Optimization of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Networks — Part I’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 5, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, P. M. and Lohani, B. N.: 1984b, ‘Optimization of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Networks — Part II’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 5, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, R. E.: 1981, Design of Air Quality Monitoring Networks, MacMillan Press Ltd. Basingstoke, Hampshire, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, K. E. and Miller, T. M.: 1977a, Air Monitoring Network Design, Ann Arbour Science, 1977.

  • Ott, W. R.: 1978, Environmental Indices: Theory and Practice, Ann Arbour Science.

  • Stern, A. C.: 1976, ‘The Problem Before Us’, in M. M., Bennarie (ed.), Key-Note Address, Proceedings in the 12th International Colloquim on Atmospheric Pollution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modak, P.M., Lohani, B.N. Optimization of ambient Air Quality Monitoring Networks. Environ Monit Assess 5, 39–53 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396393

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396393

Keywords

Navigation