Skip to main content
Log in

Structural characteristics of post-wildfire and clearcut landscapes

  • Global to Local Modelling
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A continuing discussion in the field of ecology and forest management concerns the implications of clearcutting as a functional replacement for wildfire in disturbance-driven ecosystems. At the landscape level, spatial pattern has been shown to influence many ecologically important processes. Satellite imagery allows the evaluation of structural patterns created by alternative forest management activities at broad scales. In Northwestern Ontario, both clearcutting and wildfire have occurred over large contiguous areas. Spatial characteristics including composition, patch size, patch shape, and interspersion were calculated from classified Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data at two thematic scales and used to compare post-wildfire and clearcut landscapes. Patches in the clearcut landscape were found to be larger in size, and had a more irregular shape than those in the wildfire landscape. Differences in landscape structure were much more pronounced at broad scales than at fine thematic scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BakerW.L.: 1993, ‘Spatially heterogeneous multi-scale response of landscapes to fire suppression’, Oikos 66, 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverley, A.M. and Penton, P.G. (eds.): 1989, ELAS Science and Technology Laboratory Applications Software, Volume II, Users Reference, NASA Report No. 183.

  • Ducks Unlimited: 1991, DISPlay TRAIN EDIT: A User s Reference Guide. Habitat Inventory and Evaluation, Ducks Unlimited, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee, 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS: 1991, ERDAS Version 7.5, Field Guide, Atlanta, Georgia, 394 pp.

  • FranklinJ.F. and ForemanT.T.: 1987, ‘Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles’, Landscape Ecology 1, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M.J.: 1994, ‘An evaluation of remotely sensed wetland mapping’, M.Sc.F. Thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, 79 pp.

  • HallF.G., BotkinD.B., StrebelD.E., WoodsK.D. and GoetzS.J.: 1991, ‘Large-scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing’, Ecology 72, 628–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • HessG. 1994, ‘Pattern and error in landscape ecology: a commentary’, Landscape Ecology 9, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • HollingC.S.: 1992, ‘Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems’, Ecological Monographs 62, 447–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • LevinS.A.: 1992, ‘The problem of pattern and scale in ecology’, Ecology 73, 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigalK. and MarksB.J.: 1993, ‘FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure’ Unpubl. software, Dep. Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MladenoffD.J., WhiteM.A., PastorJ. and CrowT.R.: 1993, ‘Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes’, Ecological Applications 3, 294–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • RosenfieldG.H. and Fitzpatrick-LinsK.: 1986, ‘A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52, 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoweJ.S.: 1972, ‘Forest Regions of Canada’, Publ. No. 1300, Dep. Environ., Can. Forest Service, Ottawa, Ontario, 172 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SimsR.A., TowillW.D., BaldwinK.A. and WickwareG.M.: 1989, ‘Field guide to the forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario’, Ont. Min. Nat. Resour., Toronto, Ontario, 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SufflingR., LihouC. and MorandY.: 1988, ‘Control of landscape diversity by catastrophic disturbance: a theory and a case study of fire in a Canadian boreal forest’, Env. Management 12, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • SyrjänenK., KalliolaR., PuolasmaaA. and MattssonJ.: 1994, ‘Landscape structure and forest dynamics in subcontinental Russian European Taiga’, Ann. Zool. Fennici 31, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • TouJ.T. and Gonzalez: 1974, Pattern Recognition Principles, Addison Wesley Co., Reading, Massachussetts, 377 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • TurnerM.G.: 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process’, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • TurnerM.G. and RommeW.H.: 1994, ‘Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems’, Landscape Ecology 9, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • WickwareG.M. and RubecC.D.A.: 1989, ‘Ecoregions of Ontario’, Ecological Land Classification Series No. 26, Sustainable Development Branch, Environ. Can., Ottawa, Ontario, 37 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • WilliamsJ.E., WhelanR.J. and GillA.M.: 1994, Fire and environmental heterogeneity in southern temperate forest ecosystems: implications for management’, Austral. J. Bol. 42, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gluck, M.J., Rempel, R.S. Structural characteristics of post-wildfire and clearcut landscapes. Environ Monit Assess 39, 435–450 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396160

Keywords

Navigation