Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary databases for forest ecosystem management-examples from Ontario and possibilities for Canada: NatGRID

  • Global to Local Modelling
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper identifies some scientific impediments to ecosystem management and describes bio-physical databases required to help systematically and empirically address the ecological sustainability challenge. Examples are drawn from ongoing work in Ontario. This work has implications for efforts in ecological land classification, landscape ecology, more efficient locating of research and monitoring plots, wildlife management and ultimately trade-off analyses. We conclude with the recommendation that the key primary databases, as currently evolving for Ontario, could and should be developed nationally, thereby creating a “NatGRID database”, i.e., Nationally Georeferenced Resource Information for Decision-making. NatGRID could be used to help address, in a more quantitative manner, fundamental questions regarding ecological sustainability and trade-offs in forest management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous: 1992a, ‘National forest strategy: sustainable forests: a Canadian commitment’, Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, Ottawa, Ontario, 28 pp.

  • Anonymous: 1992b, ‘Development of a spatial database of red and white pine old-growth forest in Ontario-West’, Ont. For. Fragment. & Biodiv. Project, Rep. No. 5., Ont. For. Res. Inst., Ont. Min. Nat. Resour., Sault Ste. Marie, prepared by Spectranalysis Inc., Oakville, Ontario, 41 pp. + mapsheets.

  • BandL.E., PetersonD.L., RunningS.W., CoughlanJ., LammersR., DunganJ. and NemaniR.: 1991, ‘Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: basis for distributed simulation’, Ecol. Model. 56, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • BandL.E., PattersonP., NemaniR. and RunningS.W.: 1993, ‘Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: incorporating hillslope hydrology’, Agric. and For. Meteorol. 63, 93–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biodiversity Convention Office: 1994, ‘Canadian biodiversity strategy’, Draft, Ottawa, Ontario.

  • BoothD.L., BoulterD.W.K., NeaveD.J., RotherhamA.A. and D.A.Welsh.: 1993, ‘Natural forest landscape management: a strategy for Canada’, Forestry Chronicle 69, 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • BowesM.D. and KrutillaJ.V.: 1989, Multiple-Use Management: The Economics of Public Forest Lands, Resources for the Future, Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, 350 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • BurgerD.: 1993, ‘Revised site regions of Ontario: concepts, methodology and utility’, Research Report No. 129, Ont. For. Res. Inst., Ont. Min. Nat. Resour., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • CrowT.R., HaneyA. and WallerD.M.: 1994, ‘Report on the scientific roundtable on biological diversity convened by the Chequamegon and Nicolet National Forests’, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. NC-166, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., North Central For. Exper. Stat., St. Paul, Minnesota, 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada: 1990, Canada's Green Plan, Department of Supply and Services, Ottawa, Ontario, 174 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • HunterJr.M.L.: 1990, Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 370 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • HutchinsonM.F.: 1989, ‘A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits’, J. Hydrol. 106, 211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • HutchinsonM.F.: 1987, ‘Methods for generation of weather sequences’, In: A.H.Bunting (ed.), Agricultural Environments: Characterisation, Classification and Mapping, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledig, F.T.: 1993, ‘Secret extinctions: the loss of genetic diversity in forest ecosystems’, In: M.A. Fenger, E.H. Miller, J.A. Johnson and E.J.R. Williams (eds.), Our Living Legacy: Proceedings of a Symposium on Biological Diversity, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, pp. 127–140.

  • LindenmayerD.B., NixH.A., McMahonJ.P., HutchinsonM.F. and TantonM.T.: 1991, ‘The conservation of Leadbeater's Possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri McCoy, a case study of the use of bioclimatic modelling’, J. Biogeogr. 18, 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • LesslieR., MackeyB.G. and PreeceK.M.: 1988, ‘A computer-based method for evaluation of wilderness’, Environmental Conservation 15, 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • MackeyB.G.: 1994, ‘Predicting the potential disturbance of rainforest structural characteristics’, Journal of Veg. Science 5, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • MackeyB.G. and SimsR.A.: 1993, ‘A climatic analysis of selected boreal tree species, and potential responses to global climate change’, World Res. Rev. 5(4), 469–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • MackeyB.G. and McKenneyD.W.: 1994, ‘The bio-environmental indices project: an overview’, NODA/NFP Tech. Rep. No. 1, Can. For. Serv.-Ont. Region, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, 5 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, B.G., Sims, R.A., Baldwin, K.A. and Moore, I.D.: 1994a, ‘Spatial analysis of boreal forest ecosystems: results from the Rinker Lake case study’, In: Proceedings Internat. Conf. on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modelling, Sept. 26–30, 1993, Breckenridge, Colorado, (in press).

  • MackeyB.G., McKenneyD.W., SimsR.A., WiddifieldC., LawrenceK. and SzcyrekN.: 1994b, ‘A new digital elevation model of Ontario’, NODA/NFP Tech. Rep. No. TR-6, Can. For. Serv.-Ontario, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, 26 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MackeyB.G. and McKenneyD.W.: 1995, ‘SEEDWHERE: a computer tool for tree planting and ecological restoration’, NODA/NFP Tech. Note No. 12, Can. For. Serv.-Ontario, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • MackeyB.G., McKenneyD.W. and NippersB.: 1995, ‘EDIS-Environmental Domain Interrogation System: a decision support tool for assessing representativeness’, NODA/NFP Tech. Rep., Can. For. Serv.-Ontario, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, B.G., McKenney, D.W., Yang, Y.Q., McMahon, J.P. and Hutchinson, M.F.: 1995, ‘A climatic analysis of Hills site regions for the province of Ontario, Can. J. For. Res. (in press).

  • MarshallI.B., HirvonenH. and WikenE.: 1993, ‘National and regional scale measures of Canada's ecosystem health’, In: S.Woodley, J.Kay, and G.Francis (eds.), Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, Heritage Resources Centre, Univ. Waterloo & Can. Parks Serv., St. Lucie Press, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenneyD.W., MackeyB.G., McKeeJ.E. and ZavitzB.L.: 1995, ‘A representativeness assessment of forest ecosystem and growth and yield plots in Ontario’, NODA/NFP Tech. Rep., Can. For. Serv.-Ontario, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney D.W., Sims R.A., Mackey, B.G. and Campbell, K.L. (eds.): 1994, Towards a Set of Biodiversity Indicators for Canadian Forests: Proceedings of a Forest Biodiversity Indicators Workshop, Natural Resources Canada, Can. For. Serv.-Ontario, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, 133 pp.

  • MooreI.D., GraysonR.B. and LadsonA.R.: 1991, ‘Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications’, Hydrol. Process 5, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • NixH.A.: 1986, ‘A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes’, In: R.Longmore (ed.), Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia, Australian Flora and Fauna Series No. 7, Australian Government Publications Service, Canberra, Australia, pp. 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palko, S., Lowe, J.J. and Pokrant, H.T.: 1993, ‘Canada's new, seamless forest cover data bases’, In: Proceedings, GIS 93, Vancouver, British Columbia, pp. 987–990.

  • RehfeldtG.E.: 1990, ‘Genetic differentiation among populations of Pinus ponderosa from the Upper Colorado River Basin’, Botanical Gazette 151(1), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShieldsJ.A., TarnocaiC., ValentineK.W.G. and MacDonaldK.B.: 1991, ‘Soil landscapes of Canada: procedures manual and user's handbook’, Publ. No. 1868/E, Agriculture Canada, Communications Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, 74 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShugartH.H., SmithT.M. and PostW.M.: 1992, ‘The potential for application of individual-based simulation models for assessing the effects of global change’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. System 23, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • SimsR.A., TowillW.D., BaldwinK.A. and WickwareG.M.: 1989, ‘Field guide to the forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario’, For. Can., Ont. Reg., Sault Ste. Marie, and Ont. Min. Nat. Res., Thunder Bay, Ontario, 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R.A. and Mackey, B.G.: 1994, ‘Development of spatially-based ecosystem models for the Rinker Lake Research Area in northwestern Ontario's forest’, In: Proceedings, GIS 94, Volume 2, Vancouver, British Columbia, pp. 665–674.

  • Sims, R.A.: 1995, ‘Ecologically-based land and site classifications: frameworks for the description of ecological resources’, In: T.J. Beechey (ed.), Workshop Proceedings, Coping with Ecological Representation, Ann. Gen. Mtg., Can. Counc. Ecol. Areas, Aug. 10–13, 1993, Windsor, Ontario, (in press).

  • Sims, R.A., Mackey, B.G. and Baldwin, K.A.: 1995, ‘Stand and landscape level applications of a forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario, Canada, Annal. Sci. For. 6.

  • Woodley, S.: 1993, ‘Assessing ecosystem health in protected areas’, In: S.F. Poser, W.J. Crins and T.J. Beechey (eds.), Size and Integrity Standards for Natural Heritage Areas in Ontario, Proceedings of a Seminar, Parks and Natur. Heritage Policy Br., Ont. Min. Natural Resour., Huntsville, Ontario, pp. 93–99.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Canadian Forest Service-Ontario, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, P.O. Box 490, P6A 5M7, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

    Daniel W. McKenney

  2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, The Australian National University, 0200, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Brendan G. Mackey

  3. Canadian Forest Service-Ontario, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, P.O. Box 490, P6A 5M7, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

    Richard A. Sims

Authors
  1. Daniel W. McKenney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brendan G. Mackey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard A. Sims
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKenney, D.W., Mackey, B.G. & Sims, R.A. Primary databases for forest ecosystem management-examples from Ontario and possibilities for Canada: NatGRID. Environ Monit Assess 39, 399–415 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396158

Keywords

Search

Navigation