Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction-global to local: Ecological Land Classification

  • Introduction
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological Land Classification (ELC) is a scientific endeavour which attempts to organize, stratify and evaluate ecosystems (and complexes of ecosystems) for the purposes of land resource management. Since ecosystems themselves are not easily defined in practical terms, ELC is likewise not a trivial concept. Nonetheless, ELC is a prerequisite for ecosystem management and the conservation of biological diversity simply because ecosystems must be described, characterized and spatially-located before they can be managed. Regarding the current status and future direction of ELC, mainly in relation to forest management: 1) approaches to ELC construction and utilization have shifted considerably over the past 2 decades; 2) there appears to be a current consensus regarding basic approaches to ELC; 3) spatial scale is a critical variable that must be addressed by ELCs; 4) ELCs must strive to more directly address management objectives; 5) natural ecosystem functions need to be better integrated within ELC frameworks; and, 6) the need for quality, georeferenced ELC-related data will continue to grow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • BaileyR.G., AversP.E., KingT. and McNabW.H.: 1994, ‘Ecoregions and Subregions of the United States, revised edition’, Map at 1:7 500 000 scale, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoothD.L., BoulterD.W.K., NeaveD.J., RotherhamA.A. and WelshD.A.: 1993, ‘Natural fprest landscape management: a strategy for Canada’, Forestry Chronicle 69, 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • BormannB.T., BrookesM.H., FordE.D., KiesterA.R., OliverC.D. and WeigandJ.F.: 1994a, ‘A framework for sustainable-ecosystem management’, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-331, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Portland, Oregon, 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • BormannB.T., CunninghamP.G., BrookesM.H., ManningV.W. and CollopyM.V.: 1994b, ‘Adaptive ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest’, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-341, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Portland, Oregon, 22 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Forest Serivice: 1995, ‘Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests: the Montreal Process’, Nat. Resour. Can., Hull, Quebec, 27 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, T.R.: 1994, ‘Habitats, ecosystems, or landscape ecosystem? What's the difference?’, In: J.K. Jordan and P.W.C. Uhlig (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Ecosystem Management Strategies for the Lake Superior Region, May 16–19, 1994, Continuing Education and Extension, Univ. Minnesota, Duluth, Minn., USA, pp. 12–15.

  • CrowT.R., HaneyA. and WallerD.M.: 1994, ‘Report on the scientific roudtable on biological diversity convened by the Chequamegon and Nicolet Natinal Forests’, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. NC-166, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., St. Paul, Minnesota, 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FrancisG.: 1993, ‘Ecosystem management’, Natural Resources Journal 33, 315–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrumbineR.E.: 1994, ‘What is ecosystem management?’, Conserv. Biol. 8, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • HollingC.S. (ed.): 1978, Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 377 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J.K. and Uhlig, P.W.C. (eds.): 1994, Proceedings of the Conference on Ecosystem Management Strategies for the Lake Superior Region, May 16–19, 1994, Continuing Education and Extension, Univ. Minnesota, Duluth, Minn., USA, 69 pp.

  • KaufmannM.R., GrahamR.T., BoyceD.A., MoirW.H., PerryL., ReynoldsR.T., BassettR.L., MehlopP., EdminsterC.B., BlockW.M. and CornP.S.: 1994, ‘An ecological basis for ecosystem management’, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-246, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Ft. Collins, Colorado, 22 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • KimminsJ.P.: 1987, Forest Ecology, Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, USA, 531 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • KingA.W.: 1993, ‘Considerations of scale and hierarchy’, In: S.Woodley, J.Kay and G.Francis (eds.), Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, Heritage Res. Centre, Univ. Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont. and Can. Parks Serv., Ottawa, Ont., pp. 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • KlijnF.: 1994a, ‘Spatially nested ecosystems: guidelines for classification from a hierarchical perspective’, In: F.Klijn (ed.), Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 85–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • KlijnF. (ed.): 1994b, Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, The Netherlands, 293 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • LarsenG.L.: 1994, ‘Forests at UNCED: an emerging global consensus toward sustainability’, In: M.H. Huff, L.K. Norris, J.B. Nyberg and N.L. Wilkin (coords.), Expanding Horizons of Forest Ecosystem Management: Proceedings of Third Habitat Futures Workshop, October 1992, Vernon, British Columbia, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-336, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Portland, Oregon, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • LarsenJ.B.: 1995, ‘Ecological stability of forests and sustainable silviculture’, Forest Ecol. and Manage. 73, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • MannC.C. and PlummerM.L.: 1993, ‘The high cost of biodiversity’, Science 260, 1868–1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, I.B. and Smith, C.A.S.: 1996, ‘A national ecosystems framework for monitoring and reporting on environmental sustainability in Canada’, Envir. Monitor. and Assessm. (this volume).

  • McKenney, D.W., Sims, R.A., Soulé, M., Mackey, B.G. and Cambell, K.L. (eds.): 1994, Towards a Set of Biodiversity Indicators for Canadian Forests: Proceedings of a Forest Biodiversity Indicators Workshop, Can. Forest Serv., Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., 133 pp.

  • McKenney, D.W., Sims, R.A. and Mackey, B.G.: 1996, ‘Primary databases for forest ecosystem management-examples from Ontario and possibilities for Canada: NatGRID’, Envir. Monitor. and Assessm. (this volume).

  • McNabW.H. and AversP.E. (compilers): 1994, ‘Ecological Subregions of the United States: Section Descriptions’, Admin. Publ. No. WO-WSA-5, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, DC, 267 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoweJ.S.: 1961, ‘The level of integration concept and ecology’, Ecology 42, 420–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoweJ.S.: 1992, ‘The ecosystem approach to forestland management’, Forestry Chronicle 68, 222–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J.S.: 1996, ‘Land classification and ecosystem classification’, Envir. Monitor. and Assessm. (this volume).

  • RoweJ.S. and SheardJ.W.: 1981, ‘Ecological land classification: a survey approach’, Environmental Management 5(5), 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • SalwasserH. and PfisterR.D.: 1994, ‘Ecosystem management: from theory to practice’, In: W.W. Covington and L.F. DeBano (tech. coords.), Sustainable Ecological Systems: Implementing an Ecological Approach to Land Management, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-247, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Ft. Collins, Colo., pp. 150–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • SimberloffD.: 1994, ‘How forest fragmentation hurts species and what to do about it’, In: W.W. Covington and L.F. DeBano (tech. coords.), Sustainable Ecological Systems: Implementing an Ecological Approach to Land Management, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-247, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Ft. Collins, Colo., pp. 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • SlocombeD.S.: 1993, ‘Implementing ecosystem-based management’, BioScience 43, 612–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • SwansonF.J. and FranklinJ.F.: 1992, ‘New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest forests’, Ecol. Applic. 2, 262–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • TansleyA.G.: 1935, ‘The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms’, Ecology 16, 284–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de HaesH.A. and KlijnF.: 1994, ‘Environmental policy and ecosystem classification’, In: F.Klijn (ed.), Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • UrbanD.L.: 1994, ‘Landscape ecology and ecosystem management’, In: W.W. Covington and L.F. DeBano (tech. coords.), Sustainable Ecological Systems: Implementing an Ecological Approach to Land Management, Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-247, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Ft. Collins, Colo., pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • UrbanD.L., O NeillR.V. and ShugartH.H.: 1987, ‘Landscape ecology—a hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns’, BioScience 37, 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • WaltersC.J. and HollingC.S.: 1990, ‘Large scale management experiments and learning by doing’, Ecology 71, 2060–2068.

    Google Scholar 

  • WikenE.B., WelchD.M., IronsideG.R. and TaylorD.G.: 1981, ‘The northern Yukon: an ecological land survey’, Ecological Land Classification Series No. 6, Environment Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, 197 pp. (with map at 1:1 000 000 scale).

    Google Scholar 

  • WikenE.B., RubecC.D.A. and IronsideG.: 1993, ‘Canada s Terrestrial Ecoregions, 5th ed.’, (MCR 4164), Map at 1:7 500 000 scale, National Atlas of Canada, Canada Centre for Mapping, Energy, Mines and Resources, and State of the Environment Reporting, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZonneveldI.S.: 1994, ‘Basic principles of classification’, In: F.Klijn (ed.), Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrcht, The Netherlands, pp. 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sims, R.A., Corns, I.G.W. & Klinka, K. Introduction-global to local: Ecological Land Classification. Environ Monit Assess 39, 1–10 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396130

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396130

Navigation