Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic sonography in the diagnosis of ligament and meniscal injuries of the knee

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A total of 84 patients with ligament or meniscal injuries of the knee was prospectively examined clinically and under anaesthesia, by arthroscopy and sonography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were compared. For sonography a high resolution scanner (Picker LSC 7000 with a 5-MHz transducer) was used. The sonographical examination was dynamic under normal and stress conditions. The sensitivity of sonography for diagnosis of rupture of the medial collateral ligament (LCM) was 87%, of the anterior cruciate ligament (LCA), 70% and of menisci, 89% and was thereby similar to that for examination under anaesthesia and arthroscopy and significantly superior to clinical examination alone. The specificity of sonography was very high: for rupture of the LCM 96%, the LCA 98% and the menisci 78%. Only for diagnosis of partial ligament rupture, especially partial LCA rupture, was the sensitivity of sonography low. In diagnosing ligament and meniscal injuries of the knee, sonography should be used routinely as a primary diagnostic tool after clinical examination because:

  1. 1.

    It is inexpensive

  2. 2.

    It has no side effects

  3. 3.

    It helps to cut down X-ray exposure

  4. 4.

    Anaesthesia is not required

  5. 5.

    It allows the recognition and avoidance of muscle tightness

  6. 6.

    Repetitions are possible at will

  7. 7.

    Documentation is included

  8. 8.

    Sensitivity and specificity are very good

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Decker R, Ruf W (1988) Diagnostische Sicherheit verschiedener Untersuchungsverfahren beim frischen ligamentären Knietrauma. Unfallchirurgic 14:204–210

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dragonat P, Claussen C (1980) Sonographische Meniskusdarstellungen. Fortschr Rontgenstr 133:185–187

    Google Scholar 

  3. Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melonn CL, Murohy WA, Missouri StL (1986) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:440–450

    Google Scholar 

  4. Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Melons GL, Totty WG, Murphy WA (1986) Pitfalls of rotator cuff sonography. AJR 146:555–560

    Google Scholar 

  5. Röhr E (1985) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur sonographischen Darstellung der Kreuzädnder. Fortschr Rontgenstr 143:467–468

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ruf W, Mischkowsky T, Friedl W (1985) Diagnostisches Vorgehen beim stumpfen Bauchtrauma. Chirurg 54:673–679

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schricker T, Men NM, Wirht CJ (1987) Klinische Ergebnisse sonographischer Funktionsuntersuchungen bei KapselbandlÄsionen am Knie- und Sprunggelenk. Ultraschall Med 8:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sohn C, Gerngroß H, Böhren W, Swodbodnik W (1987) Sonographie des Meniskus und seiner Läsionen. Ultraschall Med 8:32–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedl, W., Glaser, F. Dynamic sonography in the diagnosis of ligament and meniscal injuries of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 110, 132–138 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395794

Keywords

Navigation