Marine Biology

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 191–197 | Cite as

Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight. II. Grazing rates of field populations

  • J. F. Heinbokel


The feeding behavior of relatively undisturbed natural populations of tintinnids was studied in a series of experiments which utilized water samples collected in Southern California coastal waters. Dilute suspensions of corn starch were presented to the tintinnids and the rates of ingestion of this visual tracer determined after short (5 to 20 min) incubations followed by fixation in Lugol's iodine fixative. Tintinnids were observed to ingest particles of diameters up to approximately 43% of their lorica oral diameter and at rates proportional to their oral diameters. Grazing rates observed in these experiments ranged up to approximately 10 μl tintinnid-1 h-1, and generally agreed well with the rates observed in experiments utilizing laboratory cultures of tintinnids. No significant diel periodicity in feeding rates was observed in the one study extending over a 24 h period.


Starch Corn Iodine Water Sample Natural Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bartlett, M.S.: Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics 5, 207–212 (1949)Google Scholar
  2. Beers, J.R., F.M.H. Reid and G.L. Stewart: Microplankton of the North Pacific Central Gyre. Population structure and abundance, June, 1973. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 60, 607–638 (1975)Google Scholar
  3. —, M.R. Stevenson, R.W. Eppley and E.R. Brooks: Plankton populations and upwelling off the coast of Peru, June 1969. Fish. Bull. U.S. 69, 859–876 (1971)Google Scholar
  4. — and G.L. Stewart: Mirco-zooplankton in the euphotic zone at five locations across the California Current. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 24, 2053–2068 (1967)Google Scholar
  5. ——: Micro-zooplankton and its abundance relative to the larger zooplankton and other seston components. Mar. Biol. 4, 182–189 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. ——: The ecology of the plankton off La Jolla, California, in the period April through September, 1967. Part VI. Numerical abundance and estimated biomass of microzooplankton. Bull. Scripps Instn Oceanogr. (New Ser.) 17, 67–87 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Biernacka, I.: Studies on the reproduction of some species of the genus Tintinnopsis Stein. [In Polish; English abstract]. Annls Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska (Sect. C) 6, 211–247 (1952)Google Scholar
  8. Blackbourn, D.J.: The feeding biology of tintinnid Protozoa and some other inshore microzooplankton, 224 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia 1974Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, A.S.: The cytology of Tintinnopsis nucula (Fol) Laackmann with an account of its neuromotor apparatus, division, and a new intranuclear parasite. Univ. Calif. Publs Zool. 29, 179–236 (1926)Google Scholar
  10. Frost, B.W.: A threshold feeding behavior in Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 263–266 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. Gold, K.: Some observations on the biology of Tintinnopsis sp. J. Protozool. 15, 193–194 (1968)Google Scholar
  12. — and E.A. Morales: Seasonal changes in lorica sizes and the species of Tintinnida in the New York Bight. J. Protozool. 22, 520–528 (1975)Google Scholar
  13. Heinbokel, J.F.: Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight. I. Grazing and growth rates in laboratory cultures. Mar. Biol. 47, 177–189 (1978)Google Scholar
  14. Kofoid, C.A. and A.S. Campbell: The Tintinnoinea of the eastern tropical Pacific. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 84, 1–473 (1939)Google Scholar
  15. Spittler, P.: Feeding experiments with tintinnids. Oikos (Suppl.) 15, 128–132 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Heinbokel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Chesapeake Bay InstituteThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations