Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The annual cycle of protozooplankton in the Kiel Bight

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protozooplankton (heterotrophic dinoflagellates and ciliates) composition and biomass was studied in a 20-m water column in the Kiel Bight on 44 occasions between January 1973 and April 1974. Both groups attained comparable biomass maxima during spring and autumn (0.3 to 0.7 g C m-2 in the 20-m water column) and biomass levels were much lower in summer and lowest in winter. The spring protozooplankton maximum coincided with that of phytoplankton and during the rest of the year, protozooplankton stocks did not appear to be food limited as phytoplankton stocks were large throughout; many protozoans with ingested microplankton cells were observed, indicating that their potential food supply is not restricted to nanoplankton. Non-loricate organisms dominated biomass of the ciliates and tintinnids were of little importance. Tintinnids predominated in plankton samples concentrated by 20 μm gauze indicating that most non-loricate ciliates, irrespective of size, were not retained. When phytoplankton sotcks were large (>3 g C m-2) but those of metazooplankton small, as in spring and autumn, protozooplankton were the major herbivores with biomass levels comparable to those attained in summer by metazooplankton (≈ 0.5 g C m-2). A highly significant negative correlation was found between protozooplankton and metazooplankton during the plankton growth season. Predation by the latter is thus an important factor regulating size of the protozooplankton population, although other factors also appear to be in operation. Loss rates of the pelagic system through sedimentation are highest in spring and autumn when protozooplankton dominate the grazing community and loss rates are much lower in summer when metazooplankton are the dominant herbivores. Apparently, the impact of protozooplankton grazing on the pelagic system is quite different to that of the metazooplankton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Beers, J. R. and G. L. Stewart: Numerical abundance and estimated biomass of microzooplankton. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. 17, 67–87 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. G., D. C. Brownlee, D. R. Heinle, H. J. Kling and R. R. Colwell: Ciliates as a food source for marine planktonic copepods. Microb. Ecol. 4, 27–40 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K. J.: Protozoa. Zooplankton. Cons. Perm. Int. p. l'Explor. de la Mer 110, 1–4 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodungen, B. von: Der Jahresgang der Nährsalze und der Primärproduktion des Planktons in der Kieler Bucht unter Berücksichtigung der Hydrographie. 116 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Kiel Univ. 1975

  • Bodungen, B. von., K. von Bröckel, V. Smetacek and B. Zeitzschel. Ecological studies on the plankton in the Kiel Bight. I. Phytoplankton. Merentutkimuslait. Julk. Havsforskningsinst. Skr. No. 239, 179–186 (1975)

  • Bröckel, K. von: An approach to quantify the energy flow through the pelagic part of the shallow water ecosystem off Boknis Eck (Eckernförde Bay). Kieler Meeresforsch. Sonderheft Nr. 4, 233–243 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursa, A.: The annual oceanographic cycle at Igloolik in the Canadian Arctic. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 18, 563–615 (1961a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursa, A.: Phytoplankton of the Calanus expeditions in Hudson Bay, 1953 and 1954. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 18, 51–83 (1961b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, R. J. and P. Mayzaud: Respiration and nitrogen excretion of neritic zooplankton in relation to potential food supply, In: Proc. 10th Eur. Symp. Mar. Biol., Ostende, Sept. 17–23. Vol. 2, 151–163, Universa Press, Wetteren (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drebes, G.: Marines Phytoplankton, 186pp. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbrächter, M.: Untersuchungen über die Populationsdynamik und Ernährungsbiologie von Dinoflagellaten im Freiland und im Labor. 91 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Kiel Univ. 1971

  • Gold, K.: Cultivation of marine ciliates (Tintinnida) and heterotrophic flagellates. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 20, 264–271 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinbokel, J. F.: Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight. I. Grazing and growth rates in laboratory cultures. Mar. Biol. 47, 177–189 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinbokel, J. F. and J. R. Beers: Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight. III. Grazing impact of natural assemblages. Mar. Biol. 52, 23–32 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, G.: An interdisciplinary marine project at the University of Kiel ‘Sonderforschungsbereich 95’. Merentutkimuslait. Julk./Havsforskningsinst. Skr. No. 239, 162–166 (1975)

  • Hillebrandt, M.: Untersuchungen über die qualitative und quantitative Zusammensetzung des Zooplanktons in der Kieler Bucht während der Jahre 1966–1968. 138 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Kiel Univ. 1972

  • Hobro, R., U. Larsson and F. Wulff: Dynamics of a phytoplankton spring bloom in a coastal area of the Northern Baltic. Prace Mor. Inst. Ryb. (In press)

  • Johannes, R. E.: Influence of marine protozoa in nutrient regeneration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 434–442 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, A.: Protozoa, I: Ciliata. In: F. Dahl (ed.) Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 886 pp. Jena: Verlag Gustav Fischer, 1935

    Google Scholar 

  • Krey, J.: Beobachtungen über den Gehalt an Mikrobiomasse und Detritus in der Kieler Bucht 1958–1960. Kieler Meeresforsch. 17, 163–175 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krey, J. and B. Zeitzschel: Longterm observations of oxygen and chlorophyll a in Kiel Bight. 12 pp. ICES, CM 1971, L: 11 (Plankton committee) (1971)

  • Kraneis, W.: Untersuchungen über den Bestand und die Artenzusammensetzung des Mikrozooplanktons bei Boknis Eck (Kieler Bucht). 52 pp. Diplomarbeit, Kiel Univ. 1974

  • Kudo, R. R.: Protozoology, 1174 pp. Illinois: C. C. Thomas, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, J.: Untersuchung zum Nahrungsgefüge im Pelagial der Kieler Bucht. Habilitationsschrift, Kiel Univ. 144 pp. 1974

  • Lohmann, H.: Untersuchungen zur Feststellung des vollständigen Gehaltes des Meeres an Plankton. Wiss. Meeresunters. Abt. Kiel, N.F. 10, 131–370 (1908)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, H.: Die Bevölkerung des Ozeans mit Plankton. Arch. Biontol. 4, 1–617 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. L. and R. S. J. Hawes: An introduction to the study of protozoa, 506 pp. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R.: The food web in the pelagic environment. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 15, 548–559 (1967a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R.: Some concepts relevant to the organization of plankton. Oceanogr. mar. biol. Ann. Rev. 5, 257–289 (1967b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R.: Cihados planktónicos de la región de afloramiento del NW de Africa, segun datos de la campana ‘Atlor II’. Res. Exp. Cient. B/O Cornide 4, 171–173 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P.: Über die Qualität und Quantität der Sekundär-und Tertiärproduzenten in einem marinen Flachwasseröko-system der westlichen Ostsee. 111 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Kiel Univ. 1975

  • Pollehne, F.: Verteilung von Zooplankton Populationen in abgeschlossenen Wasserkörpern in der Kieler Bucht. 71 pp. Diplomarbeit, Kiel Univ. 1977

  • Schiller, J.: Dinoflagellatae. In: L. Rabenhorst (ed.) Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. New York, London: Johnson Reprint Corp. 1933

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnack, S.: Untersuchungen zur Nahrungsbiologie der Copepoden (Crustacea) in der Kieler Bucht. 141 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Kiel Univ. 1975

  • Schnack, S.: Seasonal change of zooplankton in Kiel Bay. III. Calanoid Copepods. Kieler Meeresforsch. Sonderheft 4, 201–209 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth, J. M., V. Smetacek, and J. Lenz: Pelagic ecosystem structure: Heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 1256–1263 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smayda, T. R.: The growth of Skeletonema costatum during a winter-spring bloom in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Nor. Jour. Bot. 20, 219–247 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek, V.: Die Sukzession des Phytoplanktons in der westlichen Kieler Bucht. 151 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Kiel Univ. 1975

  • Smetacek, V.: Zooplankton standing stock, copepod faecal pellets and particulate detritus in Kiel Bight. Estuar. mar. cstl. Sci. 11, 477–490 (1980a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek, V.: Annual cycle of sedimentation in relation to plankton ecology in western Kiel Bight. Ophelia, Suppl. 1: 65–76 (1980b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek, V. and P. Hendrikson: Composition of particulate organic matter in Kiel Bight in relation to phytoplankton succession. Oceanol. Acta 2, 287–298 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek, V., B. von Bodungen, B. Knoppers, H. Neubert, F. Pollehne and B. Zeitzschel: Shipboard experiments on the effect of vertical mixing on natural plankton populations in the Central Baltic Sea. Ophelia, Suppl. 1: 77–98 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spittler, P.: Feeding experiments with tintinnids. Oikos suppl 15, 128–132 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathmann, R. R.: Estimating the organic carbon content of phytoplankton from cell volume or plasma volume. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 411–418 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, M. and K. D. Hoskins: Winter condition of marine plankton populations in Saanich Inlet. B. C., Canada. II. Micro-zooplankton, J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 32, 27–37 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Utermöhl, H.: Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton methodik. Mitt. int. Verein. theor. angew. Limnol. 9, 1–38 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaika, V. E.: Specific production of aquatic invertebrates. 154 pp. New York: Wiley, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitzschel, B.: Die Bedeutung der Tintinnen als Glied der Nahrungskette. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 15, 598–601 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Meereskunde an der Universität Kiel, D-2300, Kiel 1, Germany (FRG)

    V. Smetacek

Authors
  1. V. Smetacek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Hamburg

Publication No. 268 of the “Joint Research Programme” (SFB 95), Kiel University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smetacek, V. The annual cycle of protozooplankton in the Kiel Bight. Mar. Biol. 63, 1–11 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394657

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394657

Keywords

Search

Navigation