Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring differences between overlapping but unpaired spatial surveys using a geographic information system

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the results from two overlapping but unpaired synoptic surveys, a method using a geographic information system is proposed. The new method uses a GIS to create (i) minimum convex polygons (MCP) enclosing each set of survey data and (ii) Voronoi tesselations assigning area weights to each datum. The pairs of MCP and Voronoi maps are overlaid to produce a mosaic of polygons each with one datum assigned from each survey. The differences between the pairs weighted by the polygon areas provides the basis for statistical testing. Area-weighted means and variances of paired differences are computed and a z-statistic measures the significance of differences for the whole intersection area. A cross-product autocorrelation statistic provides an assessment of the spatial distribution of differences. Alternate, conventional methods are compared with the new method: analysis of variance (ANOVA), analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and contour overlays. The four methods were applied to the comparison of two macrobenthic surveys conducted in Lake Erie. Measures for five different taxa were examined. The ANOVA and ANCOVA methods found many significant differences between surveys. Both methods were judged inappropriate as sampling data are not expected to be drawn from normally-distributed populations in spatial surveys. Differences between surveys were detected but were difficult to assess using contour overlays. The new method only found a significant difference in one taxon, an expected difference as members of that taxon were absent from most sites in one survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrough, P. A.: 1986, Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Oxford University Press, New York, 193 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. F. and Hiltunen, J. K.: 1965, ‘Changes in the Bottom Fauna of Western Lake Erie from 1930 to 1961’, Limnol. Oceanogr. 10(4), 551–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermott, R. M.: 1994, ‘Benthic Invertebrate Fauna of Lake Erie 1979: Distribution, Abundance and Biomass’, Can. Tech. Rpt. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2018, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R.: 1993, ‘Effects of Zebra Mussels (Driessena polymorpha) on the Benthic Fauna of Lake St. Clair’, in Nalepa and Schoesser (eds.), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L. J., Golledge, R. G. and Costanza, C. M.: 1981, ‘Generalized Procedures for Evaluating Spatial Autocorrelation’, Geogr. Anal. 13(3), 224–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.: 1967, ‘The Detection of Disease Clustering and a Generalized Regression Approach’, Cancer Research 27, 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monserud, R. A. and Leemans, R.: 1992, ‘Comparing Global Vegetation Maps with the Kappa Statistics’, Ecol. Modelling 62, 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.: 1967, Statistical Methods. 6th edn, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 593 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, K., Mosher, J. A. and Williams, B. K.: 1984, ‘Chance-corrected Classification For Use in Discriminant Analysis: Ecological Applications’, Amer. Midl. Nat. 111(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. F.: 1992, Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Data, Elsevier Science, New York, 321 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minns, C.K., Bakelaar, C.N., Moore, J.E. et al. Measuring differences between overlapping but unpaired spatial surveys using a geographic information system. Environ Monit Assess 43, 237–253 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394452

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394452

Keywords

Navigation