Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 115–131 | Cite as

Organochlorine contamination in shorebirds from Washington state and the significance for their falcon predators

  • Charles T. Schick
  • Leonard A. Brennan
  • Joseph B. Buchanan
  • Michael A. Finger
  • Tod M. Johnson
  • Steven G. Herman
Article

Abstract

Arctic-breeding shorebirds collected in western Washington state during winter and spring, and a comparative sample collected in coastal California during the winter were analyzed for organochlorine contaminants to determine the potential impact of these residues on populations of peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) and merlins (F. columbarius) which prey upon shorebirds in western Washington. Dunlins (Calidris alpina), an important winter prey for falcons in western Washington, were collected between 1975 and 1981. During winter 1980–81, dunlins carried low organochlorine residues; DDE levels ranged from 0.01 to 1.2 ppm, and PCB levels ranged from 0.02 to 0.82 ppm (wet weight). Levels of other organochlorine contaminants (HCB, Chlordane compounds, Dieldrin, and Heptachlor Epoxide), analyzed in a subsample of dunlins, were consistently lower than DDE and PCB levels, and ranged from 0.001 to 0.22 ppm (wet weight). Dunlins in western Washington did not significantly increase their DDE or PCB burdens over the 1980–81 winter. A decline in DDE residues between 1978 and 1981 was noted, and declines in PCB residues from both 1975 and 1978 to 1980–81 were noted. Residues in other wintering shorebirds from western Washington were similar. Wintering sanderlings (Calidris alba) from California, revealed much higher DDE contamination than in Washington (up to 32 ppm, wet weight). Spring migrant shorebirds in western Washington contained both low and very high DDE residues (up to 417 ppm, wet weight). There is evidence suggesting these high DDE concentrations are accumulated along the Pacific coast of North America.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, M.: 1965, ‘Persistence and Biological Reactions of Pesticides in Soils’, Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 29, 1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Blus, L. J. and Lamont, T. G.: 1979, ‘Organochlorine Residues in Six Species of Estuarine Birds, South Carolina, 1971–75’, Pestic. Monit. J. 13, 56–60.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, L. A., Buchanan, J. B., Herman, S. G., and Johnson, T. M.: 1985, ‘Interhabitat Movements of Wintering Dunlins in Western Washington’, Murrelet 66, 11–16.Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. B., Brennan, L. A., Schick, C. T., Finger, M. A., Johnson, T. M., and Herman, S. G.: 1985, ‘Dunlin Weight Changes in Relation to Food Habits and Available Prey’, J. Field Ornithol. 56, 265–272.Google Scholar
  5. Cade, T. J.: 1983, ‘Peregrine Recovery Efforts’, Bird Conserv. 1, 115–117.Google Scholar
  6. Cade, T. J., White, C. M., and Haugh, J. R.: 1968, ‘Peregrines and Pesticides in Alaska’, Condor 70, 170–178.Google Scholar
  7. Calambokidis, J., Bowman, K., Carter, S., Cubbage, J., Dawson, P., Fleischner, T., Schuett-Hames, J., Skidmore, J., and Taylor, B.: 1978, ‘Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Concentrations and the Ecology and Behavior of Harbor Seals in Washington State Waters’, National Science Foundation Tech. Rep., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, N. C.: 1981, ‘Survival of Shorebirds (Charadrii) During Severe Weather: The Role of Nutritional Reserves’, in N. V., Jones and W. J., Wolff (eds.), Feeding and Survival Strategies of Estuarine Organisms, Plenum Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 231–249.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, C. A.: 1966, ‘Insecticide Residues in Soils’, Residue Reviews 13, 83–132.Google Scholar
  10. Enderson, J. H. and Berger, D. D.: 1968, ‘Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Residues in Peregrines and Their Prey Species from Northern Canada’, Condor 70, 149–153.Google Scholar
  11. Flickinger, E. L. and King, K. A.: 1972, ‘Some Effects of Aldrin-Treated Rice on Gulf Coast Wildlife’, J. Wildl. Manage. 36, 706–727.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, G. A.: 1971, ‘Recent Changes in the Reproductive Success of the Pigeon Hawk’, J. Wildl. Manage. 35, 122–128.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, G. A. and Donald, T.: 1980, ‘Organochlorine Pollutants, Nest-Defense Behavior and Reproductive Success in Merlins’, Condor 82, 81–84.Google Scholar
  14. Fyfe, R. W., Risebrough, R. W., and Walker, W., II: 1976, ‘Pollutant Effects on the Reproduction of the Prairie Falcons and Merlins of the Canadian Prairies’, Can. Field-Nat. 90, 346–355.Google Scholar
  15. Fyfe, R. W., Temple, S. A., and Cade, T. J.: 1976, ‘The 1975 North American Peregrine Falcon Survey’, Can. Field-Nat. 90, 228–273.Google Scholar
  16. Guenzi, W. D., Beard, W. E., and Viets, F. G., Jr.: 1971, ‘Influence of Soil Treatment on Persistence of Six Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides in the Field’, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 35, 910–913.Google Scholar
  17. Herman, S. G. and Bulger, J. B.: 1979, ‘Effects of a Forest Application of DDT on Nontarget Organisms’, Wildl. Monogr. No. 69.Google Scholar
  18. Herman, S. G and Bulger, J. B.: 1981, ‘The Distribution and Abundance of Shorebirds During the 1981 Spring Migration at Grays Harbor, Washington’, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract Rep., Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  19. Hickey, J. J. (ed.): 1969, Peregrine Falcon Populations; Their Biology and Decline, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  20. Keith, J. A. and Gruchy, I. M.: 1972, ‘Residue Levels of Chemical Pollutants in North American Birdlife’, Proc. XVth Intern. Ornithol. Congr. pp. 437–454.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, G. A. and Wells, C. E.: 1969, ‘Alkaline Pre-Column for Use in Gas Chromatographic Pesticide Residue Analysis’, J. Asso. Offic. Analy. Chem. 52, 548–553.Google Scholar
  22. Monk, J. G.: 1981, ‘California Peregrine Falcon Reproductive Outcome, Protective Effort and Data Evaluation During 1981’, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tech. Rep., Sacramento Endangered Species Office, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, P. G.: 1972, ‘Sulfuric Acid for the Cleanup of Animal Tissues for Analysis of Acid-Stable Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Residues’, J. Asso. Offic. Analy. Chem. 55, 1360–1362.Google Scholar
  24. Myers, J. P.: 1980, ‘Sanderlings (Calidris alba) at Bodega Bay: Facts, Inferences and Shameless Speculations’, Wader Study Group Bull. 30, 26–32.Google Scholar
  25. Myers, J. P.: 1984, ‘Spacing Behavior of Nonbreeding Shorebirds’, in J., Burger and B. L., Olla (eds.), Behavior of Marine Animals Vol. 6: Shorebirds, Migration and Foraging Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 271–321.Google Scholar
  26. Newton, I., Bogan, J., Meek, E., and Little, B.: 1982, ‘Organochlorine Compounds and Shell-Thinning in British Merlins (Falco columbarius)’, Ibis 124, 328–335.Google Scholar
  27. Oliphant, L. W.: 1985, ‘North American Merlin Breeding Survey’, Raptor Research 19, 37–41.Google Scholar
  28. Peakall, D. B.: 1976, ‘The Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus), and Pesticides’. Can. Field-Nat. 90, 301–307.Google Scholar
  29. Pienkowski, M. W. and Pienkowski, A.: 1983, ‘Wader Study Group Project on the Movement of Wader Populations in Western Europe: Eight Progress Report’, Wader Study Group Bull. 38, 13–22.Google Scholar
  30. Ratcliffe, D. A.: 1984, ‘The Peregrine Breeding Population of the United Kingdom in 1981’, Bird Study 31, 1–18.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, G. G.: 1984, ‘Organochlorine Pesticide and PCB Residues in Eggs and Nestlings of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) in Central Alberta’, Can. Field-Nat. 98, 258–260.Google Scholar
  32. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.: 1981, Biometry, second edition, Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  33. Springer, A. M., Walker, W. II, Risebrough, R. W., Benfield, D., Ellis, D. H., Mattox, W. G., Mindell, D. P., and Roseneau, D. G.: 1984, ‘Origins of Organochlorines Accumulated by Peregrine Falcons Breeding in Alaska and Greenland’, Can. Field-Nat. 98, 159–166.Google Scholar
  34. Stanley, R. L. and LeFavoure, H. T.: 1965, ‘Rapid Digestion and Cleanup of Animal Tissues for Pesticide Residue Analysis’, J. Asso. Offic. Agricul. Chem. 48, 666–667.Google Scholar
  35. Temple, S. A.: 1972, ‘Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Residues and Reproductive Success in Eastern North American Merlins’, Condor 74, 105–106.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, W.: 1977, ‘Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pollutants in Alaskan Gyrfalcons and Their Prey’, Auk 94, 442–447.Google Scholar
  37. Webb, R. G. and McCall, A. C.: 1973, ‘Quantitative PCB Standards for Electron Capture Gas Chromatography’, J. Chromatographic. Sci. 11, 366–373.Google Scholar
  38. White, C. M., Emison, W. B., and Williamson, F. S. L.: 1973, ‘DDE in a Resident Aleutian Island Peregrine Population’, Condor 75, 306–311.Google Scholar
  39. White, D. H., King, K. A., and Prouty, R. M.: 1980, ‘Significance of Organochlorine and Heavy Metal Residues in Wintering Shorebirds at Corpus Chirsti, Texas, 1976–77’, Pestic. Monit. J. 14, 58–63.Google Scholar
  40. White, D. H., Mitchell, C. A., and Kaiser, T. E.: 1983a, ‘Temporal Accumulation of Organochlorine Pesticides in Shorebirds Wintering on the South Texas Coast, 1979–80’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 12, 241–245.Google Scholar
  41. White, D. H., Mitchell, C. A., Kennedy, H. D., Krynitsky, A. J., and Ribick, M. A.: 1983b, ‘Elevated DDE and Toxaphene Residues in Fishes and Birds Reflect Local Contamination in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas’, Southwest Nat. 28, 325–333.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles T. Schick
    • 1
  • Leonard A. Brennan
    • 1
  • Joseph B. Buchanan
    • 1
  • Michael A. Finger
    • 1
  • Tod M. Johnson
    • 1
  • Steven G. Herman
    • 1
  1. 1.The Evergreen State CollegeOlympiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forestry and Resource ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.College of Forest Resources AR-10University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.EversonUSA
  6. 6.WinthropUSA

Personalised recommendations