Skip to main content
Log in

Controlling pollution in rural areas by economic instruments

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most interesting economic instruments for the control of environmental pollution belong to the categories of taxes (or charges) and of tradeable pollution permits. After the basic theoretical propositions of the seventies and their early applications, the search now is for practical methodologies and for a correct and effective use of such instruments. With this aim in view, the paper begins by introducing the concepts of environmental externality and of optimal level of pollution, then illustrates the two main options of control (taxation and market of tradeable permits) and briefly discusses their application in reducing pollution in wide rural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, S.E. and Lewis, D.H. (1974), ‘A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Air Quality Control Strategies’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3, 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F.M. (1958), ‘The Anatomy of Market Failure’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 72, 351–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. and Oates, W.E. (1975), The Theory of Environmental Policy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., (2nd edn, Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1969), ‘External Diseconomies, Corrective Taxes and Market Structure’, American Economic Review 59, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Stubblebine, W.C. (1962). ‘Externality’, Economica 29, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica 4, 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1960). ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, J.H. (1968). Pollution, Property and Prices, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubgaard, A. (1991), ‘Pesticide Regulation in Denmark’, in Farming and the Countryside. An Economic Analysis of External Costs and Benefits, ed. Hanley, N.D., CAB Int'l, Wallingford, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N.D. (1991). ‘The Economics of Nitrate Pollution Control in the UK’, in Farming and the Countryside. An Economic Analysis of External Costs and Benefits, ed. Hanley, N.D., CAB Int'l, Wallingford, 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P.W. (1994). ‘Equilibrium Pollution Taxes in Open Economies with Imperfect Competion’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kula, E. (1994), Economics of Natural Resources, the Environment and Policies, 2nd edn., Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1989), Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection, OECD Publications, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1991), Environmental Policy: How to Apply Economic Instruments, OECD Publications, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993), Taxation and the Environment, OECD Publications, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, D. (1991). Multimedia Environmental Models: the Fugacity Approach, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J.E. (1952). ‘External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation’, Economic Journal 62, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E.J. (1971), ‘The Post-War Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essays’, Journal of Economic Literature 9, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, L.J. (1986). ‘Risk-efficient thresholds for pest control decisions’, Journal of Agriculture Economics 1, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

  • Pigou, A.C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siehert, H. (1987). Economics of the Environment, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1971). ‘The economist's approach to pollution and its control’, Science 173, 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1978). ‘Spatially Differentiated Air Pollutant Emission Charges: An Economic and Legal Analysis’, Land Economics 3, 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1980). ‘Transferable Discharge Permits and the Control of Stationary Source Air Pollution: A Survey and Synthesis’, Land Economics 4, 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1985), Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1990), The Theory of Industrial Organization, 4th edn., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, R. (1963), ‘On Divergences between Social Cost and Private Cost’, Economica 30, 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S. (1994), ‘Global Environmental Change, Rationality and Equity’, in The Environment after Rio: International Law and Economics, ed. Campiglio, L. et al., Graham & Trotman, London, 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Sections 1, 2, 3, e 4.

Section 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pareglio, S., Sali, G. Controlling pollution in rural areas by economic instruments. Environ Monit Assess 41, 137–157 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394340

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394340

Keywords

Navigation