Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some comments on analysis techniques for censored water quality data

  • Censored Data
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When investigating trace substances in ambient water, a proportion of water sample concentrations is usually below limits of detection. In medical and industrial reliability studies, comparisons are often made of time to event data which includes right censored observations indicating only that an observation is greater than a specified value. In this paper consideration is given to the application of non-parametric procedures, widely used in the analysis of time to event data, to water quality data which is left censored.

A non-parametric estimate of the cumulative distribution function for left censored water quality data can be generated quite easily. For the comparison of levels of trace substances it is necessary to combine an unconditional likelihood for the proportion of observations below a detection limit with a partial likelihood for the portion of the distribution above the detection limit in order to make use of regression methodology. The details of this are outlined and an example is given which compares levels of toxic substances at the head and mouth of the Niagara river.

When comparisons are based on matched pair data, further modifications are necessary. A development paralleling that for time to event data is given. Consideration is also given to model extensions which allow for a dependence between observations at the same location over a period of time.

The presentation is introductory and designed to illustrate the potential of some available methodology for use in the analysis of water quality data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cox, D. R.: 1970, The Analysis of Binary Data, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R.: 1972, ‘Regression Models and Life Tables’, (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B34, 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R.: 1975, ‘Partial Likelihood’, Biometrika 62, 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, D. R.: 1986, ‘Estimation of Distributional Parameters for Censored Water Quality Data’, in Statistical, Aspects of Water Quality Monitoring, A. H.El-Shaarawi and R. E.Kwiatkowski (eds.), Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. D. and Prentice, R. L.: 1974, ‘Survival Analyses in Twin Studies and Matched Pair Experiments’, Biometrika 61, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L.: 1980, The Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L. and Meier, P.: 1958, ‘Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations’, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53, 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto, R. and Peto, J.: 1972, ‘Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Procedures’, J.R. Statis. Soc. A135, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Studies and Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    V. T. Farewell

Authors
  1. V. T. Farewell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farewell, V.T. Some comments on analysis techniques for censored water quality data. Environ Monit Assess 13, 285–294 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394234

Keywords

Search

Navigation