Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum interference between plankton species and its beneficial effect

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observations in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina (USA), indicate the presence of two kinds of conditions affecting the phytoplankton: one promotes growth, the other allows growth to take place with minimum interference, but does not in itself promote growth. Both kinds are beneficial to the species that experience them. Three examples of the second kind are: the case where some species grow while others remains roughly constant; cases where two species grow in unison and share the same biomass; the case wherein the maximum growths of species overlap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Carlucci, A. F. and P. M. Bowes: Production of vitamin B12, thiamine, and biotin by phytoplankton. J. Phycol. 6, 351–357 (1970a).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——: Vitamin production and utilization by phytoplankton in mixed culture. J. Phycol. 6, 393–400 (1970b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. O.: Growth inhibitors produced by the green algae (Volvacaceae). Arch. Mikrobiol. 76, 47–50 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie, J. E.: Hydrography of the Pamlico River estuary. Wat. Resour. Rep. Inst. Univ. N. Carolina 39, 1–69 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulburt, E. M.: A note on the phytoplankton distribution in the offshore water of the eastern and central Gulf of Mexico. Caribb. J. Sci. 12, 29–38 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E.: The ecological theater and the evolutionary play, 139 pp. New Haven and London: Yale University Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, H. W.: Growth interactions between Chlamydomonas globosa Snow and Chlorococcum ellipsoideum Deason and Bold: the role of extracellular products. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 423–432 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J.: Arguments to meaninglessness: excluded opposites and paradigm cases. In: The linguistic turn, pp 183–192. Ed. by R. Rorty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P., R. Armstrong and C. R. Goldman: Contemporaneous disequilibrium, a new hypothesis to explain the “paradox of the plankton”. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 67, 1710–1714 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, E. W. and D. F. Bumpus: The hydrography of Pamlico Sound. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 3, 181–205 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Bunt, Miami

Contribution No. 2811 from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. This study was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GA-29300, Atomic Energy Commission Contract AT(11-1)-3564 (Ref. C00-3564-2), and by the Office of Water Resources Research, Department of the Interior, through the Water Resources Research Institute, The University of North Carolina, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964. Matching Grant Agreement Number 14-01-0001-1038, OWRR Project No. B-004-NS. Matching funds and other support were provided by the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hulburt, E.M., Horton, D. Minimum interference between plankton species and its beneficial effect. Mar. Biol. 23, 35–38 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394109

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394109

Keywords

Navigation