, Volume 177, Issue 2, pp 217–227 | Cite as

Response of photosynthesis and respiration of resurrection plants to desiccation and rehydration

  • K. B. Schwab
  • U. Schreiber
  • U. Heber


Using non-invasive techniques (CO2 gas exchange, light scattering, light absorption, chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll luminescence), we have analysed the response of respiration and photosynthesis to dehydration and rehydration of leaves of the resurrection plants Craterostigma plantagineum Hochst., Ramonda mykoni Reichb. and Ceterach officinarum Lam. et DC. and of the drought-sensitive mesophyte spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). The following observations were made: (i) The rate of water loss during wilting of detached leaves of drought-tolerant resurrection plants was similar to that for leaves of the sensitive mesophyte, spinach. Leaves of Mediterranean xerophytes lost water much more slowly. (ii) Below a residual water content of about 20%, leaves of spinach did not recover turgor on rewatering, whereas leaves of the resurrection plants did. (iii) Respiration was less sensitive to the loss of water during wilting in the resurrection plants than in spinach. (iv) The sensitivity of photosynthesis to dehydration was similar in spinach and the resurrection plants. Up to a water loss of 50% from the leaves, photosynthesis was limited by stomatal closure, not by inhibition of reactions of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynthesis was inhibited and stomates reopened when loss of water became excessive. (v) After the leaves had lost 80% of their water or more, the light-dependent reactions of photosynthetic membranes were further inhibited by rewatering in spinach; they recovered in the resurrection plants. (vi) In desiccated leaves of the resurrection plants, slow rehydration reactivated mitochondrial gas exchange faster than photosynthetic membrane reactions. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation recovered only slowly.

Key words

Carbon dioxide (gas exchange) Chlorophyll (fluorescence, luminescence) Drought tolerance Light scattering (thylakoids) Resurrection plants Water stress 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bewley, J.D. (1979) Physiological aspects of desiccation tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30, 195–238Google Scholar
  2. Björkmann, O., Powles, S.B. (1984) Inhibition of photosynthetic reactions under water stress: Interactions with light level. Planta 161, 490–504Google Scholar
  3. Briantais, J.-M., Vernotte, C., Krause, G.H., Weis, E. (1986) Chlorophyll a fluorescence of higher plants: Chloroplasts and leaves. In: Light emission by plants and bacteria, pp. 539–577, Govindjee, Amesz, J., Fork, D.C., eds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowe, J.H., Cooper, A.F., Jr. (1971) Cryptobiosis. Sci. Am. 225, 30–36Google Scholar
  5. Dietz, K.-J., Heber, U. (1983) CO2-gas exchange and the energy status of leaves of Primula palinuri. Planta 158, 349–356Google Scholar
  6. Gaff, D.F., Hallam, N.D. (1974) Resurrecting desiccated plants. R. Soc. N. Z. Bull. 12, 389–393Google Scholar
  7. Gaff, D.F., Loveys, B.R. (1984) Abscisic acid content and its effects during dehydration of detached leaves of desiccation tolerant plants. J. Exp. Bot. 35, 1350–1358Google Scholar
  8. Heber, U. (1969) Conformational changes of chloroplasts induced by illumination of leaves in vivo. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 180, 302–319Google Scholar
  9. Heber, U., Santarius, K.A. (1964) Loss of adenosine thriphosphate synthesis caused by freezing and its relationship to frost hardiness problems. Plant Physiol. 39, 712–719Google Scholar
  10. Hetherington, S.E., Smillie, R.M. (1982) Humidity sensitive degreening and regreening of leaves of Borya nitida Labill. as followed by changes in chlorophyll fluorescence. Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 9, 587–599Google Scholar
  11. Hincha, D.K., Höfner, R., Schwab, K.B., Heber, U., Schmitt, J.M. (1987) Membrane rupture is the common cause of damage to chloroplast membranes in leaves injured by freezing or excessive wilting. Plant Physiol. 83, 251–253Google Scholar
  12. Hincha, D.K., Müller, M., Hillmann, T., Schmitt, J.M. (1989) Osmotic stresses cause mechanical freeze-thaw injury to thylakoids in vitro and in vivo. In: Biochemical and physiological mechanisms associated with environmental stress tolerance in plants. Proc. of a NATO-workshop, Norwich, U.K., Cherry, J., Davies, D.D., eds. in pressGoogle Scholar
  13. Junge, W. (1977) Membrane potentials in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28, 503–536Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser, K., Gaff, D.F., Outlaw, W.H., Jr. (1986) Sugar content of leaves of desiccation sensitive and desiccation tolerant plants. Naturwissenschaften 85, 608–609Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser, W.M., Kaiser, G., Prachuab, P.K., Wildman, S.G., Heber, U. (1981a) Photosynthesis under osmotic stress. Inhibition of photosynthesis of intact chloroplasts, protoplasts and leaf slices at high osmotic potentials. Planta 153, 416–422Google Scholar
  16. Kaiser, W.M., Kaiser, G., Schöner, S., Neimanis, S. (1981b) Photosynthesis under osmotic stress. Differential recovery of photosynthetic activities of stroma enzymes, intact chloroplasts and leaf slices after exposure to high solute concentrations. Planta 153, 430–435Google Scholar
  17. Kaiser, W.M., Schwitulla, M., Wirth, E. (1983) Reactions in chloroplasts, cytoplasm and mitochondria of leaf slices under osmotic stress. Planta 158, 302–308Google Scholar
  18. Köster, S., Heber, U. (1982) Light scattering and quenching of 9-aminocridine fluorescence as indicators of the phosphorylation state of the adenylate system in intact spinach chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 680, 88–94Google Scholar
  19. Krause, G.H. (1973) The high energy-state of the thylakoid system as indicated by chlorophyll fluorescence and chloroplast shrinkage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 292, 715–728Google Scholar
  20. Leopold, A.C., Musgrave, M.E., Williams, K.M. (1981) Solute lenkage resulting from leaf desiccation. Plant Physiol. 68, 1222–1225Google Scholar
  21. Malkin, S. (1977) Delayed luminescence. In: Primary processes of photosynthesis, pp. 351–427, Barber, J., ed. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Mollenhauer, A., Schmitt, J.M., Caughlan, S.J., Heber, U. (1983) Loss of peripheral membrane proteins from thylakoids during freezing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 728, 331–339Google Scholar
  23. Olabiyi, O., Kaiser, W.M., Heber, U. (1983) Respiratory activities of plant mitochondria under osmotic stress. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 111, 155–167Google Scholar
  24. Powles, S.B. (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 15–44Google Scholar
  25. Renger, G., Schreiber, U. (1986) Practical applications of fluorimetric methods to algae and higher plant research. In: Light emission by plants and bacteria, pp. 587–619, Govindjee, Amesz, J., Fork, D.C., eds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Santarius, K.A. (1973) The protective effect of surgars on chloroplast membranes during temperature and water stress and its relationship to frost, desiccation and heat resistance. Planta 113, 23–46Google Scholar
  27. Schreiber, U., Bilger, W. (1987) Rapid assessment of stress effects on plant leaves by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. In: Plant response to stress, pp. 27–53, Tenhunen, J., Catarino, F., Lange, O.L., Oechel, W., eds. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Schreiber, U., Schliwa, U., Bilger, W. (1986) Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth. Res. 10, 51–62Google Scholar
  29. Schwab, K.B. (1986) Morphologische, physiologische und biochemische Anpassungsstrategien austrocknungstoleranter höherer Pflanzen. Doctoral thesis, Universität WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwab, K.B., Gaff, D.F. (1986) Sugar and ion contents in leaf tissues of several drought tolerant plants under water stress. J. Plant Physiol. 125, 257–265Google Scholar
  31. Schwab, K.B., Heber, U. (1984) Protection of thylakoid membranes from resurrection plants against dehydration. In: Advances in photosynthesis research, vol. 3, pp. 403–406, Sybesma, C., ed. Martinus Nijhoff, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  32. Steponkus, P.L. (1984) Role of the plasma membrane in freezing injury and cold acclimitation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 543–584Google Scholar
  33. Steponkus, P.L., Dowgert, M.F., Gordon-Kamm, W.J. (1983) Destabilization of the plasma membrane if isolated plant protoplasts during a freeze-thaw cycle: The influence of cold acclimation. Cryobiology 20, 448–465Google Scholar
  34. Volger, H.U., Heber, U., Berzborn, R.J. (1978) Loss of function of biomembranes and solubilization of membrane proteins during freezing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 511, 455–469Google Scholar
  35. Walter, H. (1955) The water economy and the hydrature in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 6, 239–252Google Scholar
  36. Wiltens, J., Schreiber, U., Vidaver, W. (1978) Chlorophyll fluorescence induction: an indicator of photosynthetic activity in marine algae undergoing desiccation. Can. J. Bot. 50, 2787–2794Google Scholar
  37. Wolter, F.P., Schmitt, J.M., Bohnert, H.J., Tsugita, A. (1984) Simultaneous isolation of three peripheral proteins — a 32 kDa protein, ferredoxin-NADP+-reductase and coupling factor — from spinach thylakoids and partial characterization of the 32 kDa protein. Plant. Sci. Lett. 34, 323–334Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. B. Schwab
    • 1
  • U. Schreiber
    • 1
  • U. Heber
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl Botanik IUniversität WürzburgWürzburgFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations