Skip to main content
Log in

Mature micro-firms and their experience of funding shortages

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Funding shortages are analysed in the context of a simple neoclassical model of the micro-firm that uses financial capital for its operations. It predicts that a response to funding shortages is to substitute part-time workers for full-time workers, under the assumption that the latter are the more financial capital intensive employees. The experience of funding gaps in finance capital by long-lived micro-firms is investigated using data which were obtained by telephone interviews. The micro-firms examined had an average size of six full-time and two part-time workers, and an average age of fifteen years. Using probit estimators of the probability of experiencing funding shortages it is found that a strong and significant negative association exists between the number of part-time workers and the probability of experiencing funding shortages, refuting the simple neoclassical hypothesis, and suggesting an alternative hypothesis, emphasising the flexibility advantages of part-time embloyees in averting funding shortages. A ten per cent increase in part-time employees is shown to reduce the probability of experiencing funding shortages by two and a half per cent. A regional effect was also discovered, and bivariate probits gave results which were consistent with univariate probits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AcsZ. J., D. B.Audretsch and B.Carlsson1990, ‘Flexibility, Plant Size and Indusrial Restructuring’, in Z. J.Acs and D. B.Audretsch (eds.), The Economics of Small Firms: A European Challenge, Dorderecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • AmemiyaT., 1985, Advanced Econometrics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • AshfordJ. R. and R. R.Sowden, 1970, ‘Multivariate Probit Analysis’, Biometrics 26, 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • GreeneW. H., 1984, ‘Estimation of the Correlation Coefficient in a Bivariate Probit Model Using the Method of Moments’, Economic Letters 16, 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Department for Scotland, 1989, ‘Towards Highlands and Islands Enterprise’, Edinburgh: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Department for Scotland, 1989, ‘Towards Scottish Enterprise’, Edinburgh: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • MataJ., 1994, Firm Growth During Infancy, Small Business Economics 6, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • MuthenB., 1979, ‘A Structural Probit Model with Latent Variables’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 807–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • MyersS. C., 1984, ‘The Capital Structure, Puzzle’, Journal of Finance 39, 581–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReidG. C., 1987, Theories of Industrial Organization, Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReidG. C., L. R.Jacobsen and M. E.Anderson, 1993, Profiles in Small Business: A Competitive Strategy Approach, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. C. & M. E. Anderson, 1992, ‘A New Small Firms Database: Sample Design, Instrumentation and Summary Statistics’, Department of Economics and CRIEFF Discussion Paper, University of St. Andrews.

  • StoreyD. J., 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • VickersD., 1987, Money Capital in the Theory of the Firm, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm (CRIEFF), University of St Andrews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reid, G.C. Mature micro-firms and their experience of funding shortages. Small Bus Econ 8, 27–37 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391973

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391973

Keywords

Navigation