Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in man: dose and schedule dependence

  • Original Papers
  • Experimental Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Doxorubicin serum elimination kinetics were measured by HPLC in three different patient groups. A dose of (a) 30 mg/m2; (b) 50 mg/m2, and (c) 4×15 mg/m2 every 10 h was administered by bolus injection to (a) 10, (b) 6, and (c) 8 patients. The results obtained provided strong evidence for a nonlinear dependence of doxorubicin serum elimination on the dose and administration schedule used. Comparing the 15 and 30 mg/m2 dose there was no significant increase in early drug levels but a marked increase in terminal half-life. At doses higher than 30 mg/m2, however, there was a steep increase in early drug levels, too. Moreover a marked cumulation of the anthracycline in the central compartment following short-term (4×15 mg/m2 every 10 h) consecutive administration was found. To obtain an optimal concentration x time product by single bolus injection a dose equal or higher than 30 mg/m2 should be used. However, in this dose range a steep dose-dependent rise in early drug levels is to be expected. As early high serum levels correlate with congestive heart failure, administration schedules reaching effective concentration x time products without high peak levels such as continuous infusion or consecutive administration of low doses seem to be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benjamin RS, Wiernik PH, Bachur NR (1974) Adriamycin chemotherapy efficacy, safety and pharmacologic basis of an intermittent single high-dosage schedule. Cancer 33:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boston RC, Philips DR (1983) Evidence of possible dose-dependent doxorubicin plasma kinetics in man. Cancer Treat Rep 67:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  3. Creasy WA, Intosh LS, Brescia T, Odujiurin O, Aspnes GT, Muray E, Morsk JC (1976) Clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of different dosage schedules of adriamycin. Cancer Res 36:216–221

    Google Scholar 

  4. Creech RH, Catalano RB, Shark MK (1980) An effective low-dose adriamycin regimen as secondary chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. Cancer 46:433–437

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erb N, Erttmann R, Landbeck G (1986) A rapid chromatographic procedure for the determination of adriamycin, daunomycin and their 13-OH metabolites adriamycinol and daunomycinol. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 17:53–55

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garnick MB, Weiss GR, Steele GD, Israel M, Schade I, Sack MJ, Frei E (1983) Clinical evaluation of long-term continuous infusion of doxorubicin. Cancer Treat Rep 64:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gessner T, Rotot J, Bolanowska W, Hoerni B, Durand M, Preisler H, Rustum J (1981) Effects of prior therapy on plasma levels of adriamycin during subsequent therapy. J Med 12:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gil P, Favre R, Durand A, Iliadis A, Cano PJ, Carcassone Y (1983) Time dependency of adriamycin and adriamycinol kinetics. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 10:120–124

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jürgens H (1981) Ewing-Sarkom bei Kindern und Jugendlichen: Vorstellung der kooperativen Therapiestudie der Gesellschaft für pädiatrische Onkologie. Klin Pädiat 193:175–180

    Google Scholar 

  10. Legha SS, Benjamin RS, Mackay B, Yap HY, Wallace S, Ewer M, Blumenschein GR, Freireich EJ (1982) Adriamycin therapy by continuous intravenous infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 49:1762–1766

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lotrich J, Bothe A, Zipoli T (1984) Constant infusion schedule for adriamycin: a phase I-II clinical trial of a 30-day schedule by ambulatory pump delivery system. J Clin Oncol 1:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mattson W, Borgström S, Lanberg T (1982) A weekly schedule of low-dose doxorubicin in treatment of advanced breast cancer. Clin Ther 5:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piazza E, Donelli MG, Broggini M, Jessa C, Natale N, Ottolenghi L, Marsoni S, Lioretti A, Mangioni C, Morasca L (1980) Early phase pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin (adriamycin) in plasma of cancer patients during single or multiple drug therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 64:845–854

    Google Scholar 

  14. Preisler HD, Gessner T, Azarnia N, Bolanowska W, Epstein J, Early AP, D'Arrigo P, Vogler R, Winton L, Chervenik P, Joyce R, Lee H, Steele R, Goldberg J, Gottlies A, Browman G, Miller K, Grunwald H, Larson R, Breuman J (1984) Relationship between plasma adriamycin levels and the outcome of remission induction therapy for acute non-lymphatic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 12:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ritch PS, Occhipinti SJ, Skramstad KS, Shackney SE (1982) Increased relative effectiveness of doxorubicin against slowly proliferating sarcoma 180 cells after prolonged drug exposure. Cancer Treat Rep 66:1159–1168

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robert J, Hoerni B, Vrignaund P, Lagarde C (1983) Early-phase pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in non-Hodgkin Lymphoma patients. Dose-dependent and tissue dependent pharmacokinetic parameters. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 10:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tipping S, Riggs CE, Egorin MJ, Whitacre M, van Echo DA, Aisner J, Badur NR (1982) Accelerated disappearance of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol from plasma following prior chemotherapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol Abstract 132

  18. Treuner J, Kaatsch P, Anger Y, Seipp A, Spaar H-J, Gerein V, Suder J, Niethammer D (1986) Ergebnisse der Behandlung von Rhabdomyosarkomen (RMS) bei Kindern. Ein Bericht der Cooperativen Weichteilsarkomstudie (CW-81) der Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie. Klin Pädiat 198:208–217

    Google Scholar 

  19. Valdivieso M, Burgers MA, Ewer MS, Mackay B, Wallace S, Benjamin RS, Ali MK, Bodey GP, Freireich EJ (1984) Increased therapeutic index of weekly doxorubicin in the therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective, randomized study. J Clin Oncol 2:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vogelzang NJ, Ruane M, De Meester TR (1985) Phase I trial of an implanted battery-powered programmatic drug delivery system for continuous doxorubucin administration. J Clin Oncol 3:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss AJ, Manthel RW (1983) A hypothesis concerning the effect of changes in scheduling on the cardiotoxicity of adriamycin. Oncology 40:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  22. Young RC, Ozols RF, Myers CE (1981) The anthracycline antineoplastic drugs. New Engl J Med 305:139–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by the “Hamburger Krebsgesellschaft e. V.” and the “Werner Otto-Stiftung Hamburg”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erttmann, R., Erb, N., Steinhoff, A. et al. Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in man: dose and schedule dependence. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 114, 509–513 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391502

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391502

Key words

Navigation