Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The contribution of epidemiology to the study of occupational cancer

  • Guest Editorial
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Most chemical compounds and physical agents recognized as human carcinogens were first identified in the occupational environment by epidemiological studies. Some 2%–8% of all cancers have been attributed to occupational exposures, but the limitations of such estimates should be recognized. The use of existing medical information systems on occupational cancer for hypothesis generation may be improved by comparing the results emerging from different countries. An initiative in this direction is recommended. Clues emerging from such general systems should be submitted to further studies to test specific hypotheses concerning risk factors. Record linkage is necessary for the epidemiological study of occupational cancer. Efforts must be made towards the storage of identifiable records with information on occupation and cancer occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berrino F, Crosignan P, Pastorino U, Riboli E, Adami R, Gervasio A (1980) Valutazione del rischico attribuibile alle esposizioni professionali. Studio casi-controlli sui tumori polmonari. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione 11:70–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Case RAM, Hosker ME, McDonald DB, et al. (1954) Tumours of the urinary bladder in workmen engaged in the manufacture and use of certain dyestuff intermediates in the British chemical industry. I. Br J Ind Med 11:75–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clemmesen J (1965) Statistical studies in the aetiology of malignant neoplasms. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand I [Suppl 174]

  • Decouflé P (1982) Occupation. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J (Eds). Epidemiology and Prevention. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll R, Peto R (1981) The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the USA to-day. JNCI 66:1193–1308

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox AJ, Lynge E, Malker H (1982) Lung cancer in butchers. (Letter) Lancet I:165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginson J, Muir CS (1979) Environmental carcinogenesis: Misconceptions and limitations to cancer control. JNCI 63:1291–1298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogstedt C (1982) Paper presented at IARC meeting on the use of available statistical sources for the detection of occupational cancer. The City University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (1982a) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Chemicals, industrial processes and industries associated with cancer in humans. IARC, Lyons (IARC monographs, vols 1–29, Suppl 4

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (1982 b) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to bamans. some industrial chemicals and dyestuffs, vol 29. IARC, Lyons

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen OM (1980) Cancer risk from formaldehyde. (Letter) Lancet I:480–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen OM, Andersen SK (1982) Lung cancer risk from formaldehyde. (Letter) Lancet I:913

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynge E, Andersen O, Christensen TS (1983) Lung cancer in Danish butchers. (Letter) Lancet I:527–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council (1982) Job exposure matrices. Proceedings of a Conference held in April 1982 at the University of Southampton

  • Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1978) Occupational mortality. The Registrar Generals' Decennial Supplement for England and Wales, 1970–72. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Passey RD (1922) Experimental soot cancer. Br Med J II:1112–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott P (1775) Chirurgical observations relative to the cataract, the polypus of the nose, the cancer of the scrotum, the different kinds of ruptures, and the mortification of the toes and feet. London

  • Rehn L (1885) Blasengewülste bei Fuchsin Arbeitern. Arch Klin Chir 50:588–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ, Boice JD (1979) Epidemiological analyses with a programable calculator. NIH, Washington (Publication no. 79/1649)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse J, Muir CS, Shanmugaratnam K, Powel J (1982) Cancer incidence in five continents, vol 4. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyons (IARC scientific publications, no. 42)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Danish Cancer Registry, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology under the Danish Cancer Society, Landskronagade 66, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Ole Møller Jensen & Elsebeth Lynge

Authors
  1. Ole Møller Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elsebeth Lynge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The “Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology” publishes in loose succession “Editorials” and “Guest Editorials” on current and/or controversial problems in experimental and clinical oncology. These contributions represent exclusively the personal opinion of the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, O.M., Lynge, E. The contribution of epidemiology to the study of occupational cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 108, 257–263 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390455

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390455

Key words

Search

Navigation