Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connections and barriers between cells of Drosera tentacles in relation to their electrophysiology

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The extracellular space of tentacles of Drosera capensis L. is divided into two compartments by cuticular material between cells of an endodermoid layer and by the nonporous cuticle of the stalk and neck. The distal compartment includes the mucilaginous secretion as well as the free space of the secretory cap, since the cuticle covering the cap is perforated by numerous 0.05–0.3 μm pores. The proximal compartment includes xylem and the intercellular space of the stalk. The existence of the endodermoid partition is consistent with the observation that action potentials recorded extracellularly from the head may be positive-going while those recorded extracellularly from the stalk are negative-going. The partitioning is also consistent with the hypothesis previously proposed to explain why the amplitude of action potentials recorded from the mucilage varies as a function of the amplitude of the receptor potential.

The living cells are united by plasmodesmata. Unusually abundant plasmodesmata were observed in the walls between endodermoid cells and neck cells, between neck cells and the next row of outer stalk cells, in the end walls connecting the outer stalk cells, and the end walls connecting the inner stalk cells: these strategically located plasmodesmata presumably permit the electrotonic spread of receptor potentials and action potentials between cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arisz, W. H., Wiersema, E. P.: Symplastic long distance transport in Vallisneria plants investigated by means of autoradiograms. IA. Substances translocated. Proc. Kon. ned. Akad. Wet. C 69, 223–241 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Behre, K.: Physiologische und zytologische Untersuchungen über Drosera. Planta (Berl.) 7, 208–306 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benolken, R. M., Jacobson, S. L.: Response properties of a sensory hair excised from Venus's flytrap. J. gen. Physiol. 56, 64–82 (1970)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, H. T., Jr.: The root endodermis: fine structure and function. J. Cell Biol. 37, 199–205 (1968)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, S. C., Wardrop, A. B.: Fine structural observations on the epidermis. II. The cuticle. Planta (Berl.) 109, 39–48 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, D. T., Robards, A. W., Sanderson, J.: The tertiary endodermis in barley roots: fine structure in relation to radial transport of ions and water. Planta (Berl.) 96, 292–305 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, N., O'Brien, T. P.: Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods. Amer. J. Bot. 55, 123–142 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, C. A.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Anatomie, Entwicklungsgeschichte und Biologie der Laubblätter und Drüsen einiger Insectivoren. Flora 93, 335–434 (1904)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, W.: On the phenomena accompanying stimulation of the gland cells in Drosera dichotoma. Proc. roy. Soc. (Lond.) 39, 229–234 (1886)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K.: Pflanzenbiologische Schilderungen II, 2. Marburg: Elwert 1893

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, B. E. S., Pate, J. S.: “Transfer cells”—plant cells with wall ingrowths, specialized in relation to short distance transport of solutes—their occurrence, structure and development. Protoplasma (Wien) 68, 107–133 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlandt, G.: Sinnesorgane im Pflanzenreich. Leipzig: Engelmann 1906

    Google Scholar 

  • Homès, M.: Devéloppement des feuilles et des tentacules chez Drosera intermedia Hayne. Comportement du vacuome. Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. Roy. Belg., 5 Sér. 14, 70–88 (1928)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huie, L. M.: Changes in the cell organs of Drosera rotundifolia produced by feeding with egg-albumin. Quart. J. microscop. Sci. 39, 387–425 (1897)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W. A.: Botanical histochemistry. San Francisco-London: Freeman 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, R. D., Martins-Ferreira, H.: Membrane potentials in the electroplates of the electric eel. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 119, 315–351 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, F. E.: Carnivorous plants. New York: Ronald Press 1942

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. T., Juniper, B. E.: The cuticles of plants. New York: St. Martin's Press 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhauer, H. H.: Plastic embedding mixtures for use in electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 39, 111–114 (1964)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nitschke, T.: Morphologie des Blattes von Drosera rotundifolia. Bot. Z. 19, 145–151, 233–235, 241–246, 252–255 (1861)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, W. F.: The spatial variation of plasmalemma potential in a spherical cell polarized by a small current source. Math. Biosci. 10, 307–328 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, W.: Zur Kenntnis der Kontraktreize. Untersuch. Bot. Inst. Tübingen 1, 483–535 (1885)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragetli, H. W. J., Weintraub, M., Lo, E.: Characteristics of Drosera tentacles. I. Anatomical and cytological detail. Canad. J. Bot. 50, 159–168 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scala, J., Schwab, D., Simmons, E.: The fine structure of the digestive gland of Venus's-flytrap. Amer. J. Bot. 55, 649–657 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, E.: Zur Feinstruktur der Drüsen von Drosophyllum lusitanicum. Planta (Berl.) 54, 641–674 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, E.: Licht- und electronenmikroskopische Beobachtungen an Insectivoren-Drüsen über die Sekretion des Fangschleimes. Flora 151, 73–87 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, E.: Zur Cytologie und Physiologie pflanzlicher Drüsen. I. Über den Fangschleim der Insektivoren. Flora 153, 1–22 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, E.: Die Morphologie der Sekretion in pflanzlichen Drüsen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 78, 478–483 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, D. W., Simmons, E., Scala, J.: Fine structure changes during function of the digestive gland of Venus's. flytrap. Amer. J. Bot. 56, 88–100 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievers, A.: Zur Epidermisaußenwand der Fühlborsten von Dionaea muscipula. Planta (Berl.) 83, 49–52 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanswick, R. M., Costerton, J. W. F.: Plasmodesmata in Nitella translucens: structure and electrical resistance. J. Cell Sci. 2, 451–464 (1967)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warming, E.: Om Forskjellen mellem Trichomer og Epiblastemer af höjere Rang. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturhist. Foren. Kbh. 1872, 159–205

  • Watson, M. L.: Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. II. Application of solutions containing lead and barium. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 4, 727–730 (1958)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. E., Mozingo, H. N.: The fine structure of the trigger hair in Venus's flytrap. Amer. J. Bot. 58, 532–539 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. E., Pickard, B. G.: Secretion, absorption and cuticle structure in Drosera tentacles. (Abstr.) Plant Physiol. 44, Suppl., 5 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. E., Pickard, B. G.: Receptor potentials and action potentials in Drosera tentacles. Planta (Berl.) 103, 193–221 (1972a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. E., Pickard, G.: Properties of action potentials in Drosera tentacles. Planta (Berl.) 103, 222–240 (1972b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. E., Spanswick, R. M.: Intracellular recordings of the action potentials which mediate the thigmonastic movements of Drosera. (Abstr.) Plant Physiol. 50 Suppl., 64 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbarsht, M. L.: Electrical characteristics of insect mechanoreceptors. J. gen. Physiol. 44, 105–122 (1960)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Stephen E. Williams

    Present address: Department of Biology, Lebanon Valley College, 17003, Annville, Pennsylvania, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Washington University, 63130, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Stephen E. Williams & Barbara G. Pickard

  2. Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Washington University, 63130, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Stephen E. Williams & Barbara G. Pickard

Authors
  1. Stephen E. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara G. Pickard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, S.E., Pickard, B.G. Connections and barriers between cells of Drosera tentacles in relation to their electrophysiology. Planta 116, 1–16 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390198

Keywords

Search

Navigation