Skip to main content
Log in

Does in vitro colony formation and chemosensitivity relate to DNA ploidy and S-phase fractions?

  • Original Papers
  • Clinical Oncology or Epidemiology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In vitro colony formation and chemosensitivity were analyzed in 65 human solid tumors and compared to proliferation parameters simultaneously obtained by DNA flow cytometry of the same tumor specimens.

Colony growth in the human tumor colony assay was enhanced in aneuploid tumors (39/65) in comparison to diploid tumors (26/65, P<0.05). In addition, there was a relationship between % S-phase and colony growth. The existence of polyploid sublines (23/65) improved in vitro growth even in tumors with a diploid main G0/1-peak or with a low % S-phase. Metastases exhibited a higher proportion of aneuploidy and showed slightly better growth in vitro than primary tumors.

Sensitivity testing in 34 of the 65 tumors showed no convincing relation between DNA parameters and the inhibition of colony formation by five standard anticancer agents with different mechanisms of action. This indicates additional factors other than the proliferative activity of the tumor to be responsible for drug sensitivity or resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrez MV, Barham SS, Tarora JE, Wolff BG, Reimann HM, Ilstrup DM, Lieber MM (1983) Proliferative potential of cells from normal human colon epithelium, adenomas and carcinomas of the large bowel. J Surg Oncol 24:263–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alberts DS, Surwit EA, Leigh S, Moon TE, Salmon SE (1982) Improved survival for relapsing ovarian cancer patients using the human tumor stem cell assay to select chemotherapy. Stem Cells 1:294–295

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auer G, Caspersson TO, Wallgren AS (1980) DNA content and survival in mammary carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol 2:161–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlogie B, Göhde W, Johnston DA, Smallwood L, Schumann J, Drewinko B, Freireich EJ (1978) Determination of ploidy and proliferative characteristics of human solid tumors by pulse cytophotometry. Cancer Res 38:3333–3339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barlogie B, Johnston DA, Smallwood L, Raber MN, Maddox AM, Latreille J, Swartendruber DE, Drewinko B (1982) Prognostic implication of ploidy and proliferative activity in human solid tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 6:17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck HP (1978) Simulation of coincidences and cell aggregates in flow cytometry. In: Valleron AJ, McDonald PDM (eds) Biomathematics and cell kinetics. Elsevier/North-Holland, Biomedical Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feichter GE, Goerttler K, Haag D, Heep JL, Höpker WW et al (1984) DNA measurement impulse-cytophotometry: principles for the assessment of growth and degree of abnormality. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 109:738–744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frankfurt OS, Slocum HK, Rustum YM, Arbuck SG, Pavelic ZP, Petrelli N, Huben RP, Pontes EJ, Greco WR (1984) Flow cytometric analysis of DNA aneuploidy in primary and metastatic human solid tumors. Cytometry 5:71–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedlander ML, Hedley DW, Taylor IW, Russel P, Coates AS, Tattersall MHN (1984) Influence of cellular DNA content on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 44:397–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedlander ML, Hedley DW, Taylor IW (1984) Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumors. J Clin Pathol 37:961–974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haag D (1980) Flow microfluorimetric deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis supplementing routine histopathologic diagnosis of biopsy specimens. Lab Invest 42:85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamburger AW, Salmon SE, Kim MB, Trend IM, Soehnlen BS, Alberts DS, Schmidt HJ (1978) Direct cloning of human ovarian carcinoma cells in agar. Cancer Res 38:3438–3444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiddemann W, Schumann J, andreeff M, Barlogie B, Hermann ChJ, Leif RC, Murphy RF, Sandberg AA (1984) Convention on nomenclature for DNA cytometry. Cytometry 5:445–446

    Google Scholar 

  14. Von Hoff DD, Cowan J, Harris G, Reisdorf G (1982) Human tumor cloning: feasibility and clinical correlations. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 6:265–271

    Google Scholar 

  15. Von Hoff DD, Clark GM, Stagdill BJ, Sarosdy MF, O'Brien TM, Casper JT, Mattox TE, Page GP, Cruz AB, Sandbach JF (1983) Prospective clinical trial of a human tumor cloning system. Cancer Res 43:1926–1931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofmann V, Berens ME, Früh U (1986) Analysis of malignant effusions by cellular composition, proliferation kinetics and in vitro clonogeneity. RRCR 94 (in press)

  17. Johns ME, Mills SE (1983) Cloning efficiency: A possible prognostic indicator in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 52:1401–1404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laerum OD, Farsund T (1981) Clinical application of flow cytometry: A review. Cytometry 2:1–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer JS, Prioleau PG (1981) S-Phase fractions of colorectal carcinomas related to pathologic and clinical features. Cancer 48:1221–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tribukait B, Hammarberg C, Rubio C (1983) Ploidy and proliferation patterns in colorectal adenocarcinomas relates to Dukes' classification and to histopathological differentiation. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand Sect A 91:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  21. Volm M, Drings P, Mattern J, Sonka J, Vogt-Moykopf I, Wayss K (1984) Prognostic parameters in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 107 Suppl 94

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wolley RC, Schreiber K, Koss LG, Karas M, Sherman A (1982) DNA distribution in human colon carcinomas and its relationship to clinical behaviour. J Natl Cancer Inst 69:15–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flentje, D., Feichter, G., Flentje, M. et al. Does in vitro colony formation and chemosensitivity relate to DNA ploidy and S-phase fractions?. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 113, 87–90 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389972

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389972

Key words

Navigation