Skip to main content
Log in

Region-specific technology policy in Belgium: The significance of New Technology Based Start-ups

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the beginning of the 1980s, strategic regional technology policies have been adopted in Belgium. A number of NTBFs are emerging in generic technology industries such as micro-electronics, biotechnology and information technology. These industries are particularly conducive to the formation of NTBFs since the advancing new technologies are constantly creating new and specialist product-market niches. High technology product groups are selected/supported in the fields of aerospace, medical technology, robotics and office automation, agro-business and energy.

The regional dimension of technology policy raises the question whether a relationship can be established between strategic technology policy and New Technology Based Startups in Belgium. An outline of the current situation in Belgium (Flanders and Wallonia) provides an answer to this question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ContractorF. J. and P.Lorange, 1988, Cooperative Strategies in International Business: Joint Ventures and Technology Partnerships Between Firms, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Batselier, N., 1991, ‘Technology Policy in Flanders’, Policy Report of the Vice-chairman of the Flemish Government, Brussels.

  • DodgsonM. and R.Rothwell, 1987, ‘Patterns of Growth and R&D Activities in a Sample of Small and Medium-Sized High-Technology Firms in the UK, Denmark, Netherlands and Ireland’, Research Report, IRDAC Working Party III, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • DonckelsR. and C.Bert, 1986, ‘New Firms in the Local Economy: The Case of Belgium’, in D.Keeble and E.Wever (eds.), New Firms and Regional Development in Europe, London: Croom Helm, 124–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • DonckelsR. and J. P.Segers, 1990, ‘New Technology Based Firms and the Creation of Regional Growth Potential’, Small Business Economics 2(1), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • GibbJ. M. (ed.), 1985, Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. M., 1989, Strategic Partnership Alliances for Entrepreneurial Firms, The University of Western Ontario: Centre for Management Research and Development.

  • MillerR. and M.Côté, 1987, Growing the Next Silicon Valley: A Guide for Successful Regional Planning, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board for Science and Technology (N.B.S.T.), 1987, ‘STRIDE — Science and Technology for Regional Innovation and Development in Europe’, Final Report to the Community Programmes Division DGXVI, Dublin: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • OakeyR., 1984, High Technology Small Firms: Regional Development in Britain and the United States, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • OakeyR., R.Rothwell and S.Cooper, 1988, The Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (O.E.C.D.), 1987, Science Parks and Technology Complexes in Relation to Regional Development, Paris.

  • ParaskevopoulosC. C., 1974, ‘Patterns of Regional Economic Growth’, Regional and Urban Economics 12(4), 77–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1990, ‘Technology Transfer Infrastructures for SMEs’, paper presented at the 20th Anniversary European Small Business Seminar on ‘Growing Small Firms — The Role of Technology’, Dublin, September 11–14.

  • RothwellR. and W.Zegveld, 1982, Innovation and the Small and Medium Sized Firm. Their Role in Employment and in Economic Change, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoureJ. B. and R. H.Keely, 1989, ‘Comparison of Predicting Factors of Successful High Growth Technological Ventures in Europe and the USA’, in S.Birley (ed.), European Entrepreneurship: Emerging Growth Companies, Cranfield: European Foundation for Entrepreneurship Research, 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, J. P., 1987, Het Regionaal Industriebeleid in België: de DIRV-actie in Vlaanderen en de Opération ATHENA in Wallonië (Regional Industrial Policy in Belgium: THIRF in Flanders and ATHENA in Wallonia), Dissertation, Diepenbeek: Limburg Business School.

  • SmilorR. W. and M.Doud GillJr., 1986, The New Business Incubator: Linking Talent, Technology, Capital and Know-How, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • StoreyD. J. (ed.), 1985, Small Firms in Regional Economic Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SweeneyG. P., 1987, Innovation, Entrepreneurs and Regional Development, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syed Tariq, A., 1991, ‘Strategic Alliances and the Small Business Firms: Issues, Synergies and Limitations’, paper presented at 36th ICSB World Conference on ‘Small Business and Partnership’, Vienna, June 24–26.

  • ThwaitesA. T. and R. P.Oakey (eds.), 1985, The Regional Economic Impact of Technological Change, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van DerKnappB. and E.Wever, 1987, New Technology and Regional Development, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segers, J.P. Region-specific technology policy in Belgium: The significance of New Technology Based Start-ups. Small Bus Econ 4, 133–139 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389854

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389854

Keywords

Navigation