Abstract
This paper examines whether the determination of employment differs between large and small firms. An employment equation is estimated on panel data of 67 (35) three-digit industries in Dutch manufacturing (1974–1986). The conclusions are as follows. Firstly, employment adjustment appears to be faster in small firms than in large ones. Secondly, the elasticity of factor substitution and the real wage elasticity at constant output are nearly the same for large and small firms. Thirdly, the estimated output elasticities suggest constant returns to scale in large firms and increasing returns in small ones. Finally, the number of working hours has less impact on employment in small firms than in large ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AcsZ. J. and D. B.Audretsch, 1993, ‘Conclusions’, in Z. J.Acs and D. B.Audretsch (eds.), Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–231.
AllenR. G. D., 1938, Mathematical Analysis for Economists, London: Macmillan.
ArellanoM. and S.Bond, 1991, ‘Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations’, Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297.
BakkerK. and Y. M.Prince 1990, ‘Data Set of Dutch Manufacturing per Third Digit Industry, 1974–1986’, Fundamental Research Note 90.01, Zoetermeer: EIM.
BolA., A.Nijsen, G.Regter and F.vanRossum, 1982, ‘Werkgelegenheid en Arbeidsvolume in het Midden- en Kleinbedrijf, 1960–1980: Een Analyse over de Bijdrage van het MKB in de Totale Werkgelegenheid’, (Employment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, 1960–1980: An Analysis of the Contribution of SME in Total Employment), Zoetermeer: EIM.
CarlssonB., 1989, ‘The Evolution of Manufacturing Technology and Its Impact on Industrial Structure: An International Study’, Small. Business Economics 1, 21–37.
HamermeshD.S., 1993, Labor Demand, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HuigenR. D., A. J. M.Kleijweg, G.vanLeeuwen and C.Zeelenberg, 1994, ‘A Micro-Econometric Analysis of Interrelated Factor Demand’, Research Report 9403/E, Zoetermeer: EIM.
LeeuwenG.van and S.Schim van der Loeff, 1990, ‘Employment Equations for Dutch Manufacturing Estimated from Panel Data 1978–1986’, Voorburg: CBS.
LovemanG. and W.Sengenberger, 1991, ‘The Re-emergence of Small-Scale Production: An International Comparison’, Small Business Economics 3, 1–37.
NguyenS. V. and A. P.Reznek, 1991, ‘Returns to Scale in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturing Establishments’, Small Business Economics 3, 197–214.
NguyenS. V. and A. P.Reznek, 1993, ‘Factor Substitution in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturing Establishments: 1977–82’, Small Business Economics 5, 37–54.
NickellS. J., 1986, ‘Dynamic Models of Labour Demand’, in O.Ashenfelter and R.Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 473–522.
NickellS. J. and P.Kong, 1992, ‘An Investigation into the Power of Insiders in Wage Determination’, European Economic Review 36, 1573–1599.
SatoY., 1989, ‘Small Business in Japan: A Historical Perspective’, Small Business Economics, 1, 121–128.
StoreyD. J. and S. G.Johnson, 1990, ‘A Review of Small Business Employment: Data Bases in the United Kingdom’, Small Business Economics 2, 279–299.
TheilH., 1971, Principles of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
ThurikA. R., 1993, ‘Recent Developments in the Firm-Size Distribution and Economics of Scale in Dutch, Manufacturing’, in Z. J.Acs and D. B.Audretsch (eds.), Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lever, M.H.C. Firm size and employment determination in dutch manufacturing industries. Small Bus Econ 8, 389–396 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389556
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389556