Skip to main content
Log in

Confronting the implications of the Cournot model with industry and firm data

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper derives testable implications of the standard Cournot models and confronts these implications with real world data. Though we cannot expect that real world may be characterized by a simple static homogeneous model, it is surprising that little empirical work exists on testing the implications of this most popular model of oligopoly and non cooperative game theory.

We make use of three data sets for manufacturing industry, two of them on the firm level, one about firms grouped according to their size. The relation of the results to the predictions of the Cournot model is discussed, as well as its relation to alternative oligopoly models. We specifically focus at the question whether the implications of the oligopoly models on the performance of large versus small firms are in line with the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AigingerK., 1993a, ‘Collusion, Concentration and Profits’, Empirica 29(2), 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • AigingerK., 1993b, ‘Small Firms and the Merger Mania: A Reply’, Small Business Economics 5(1), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., 1994a, ‘Explaining Differences in Profitability on the Industry Level’, WIFO Working Paper.

  • Aiginger, K., 1994b, ‘The Usefulness of Oligopoly Models for Explaining Firm Differences in Pofitability’, Paper presented to the European Economic Association, Maastricht, 1994.

  • Aiginger, K., 1994c, ‘The Use of Game Theoretical Models for Empirical Research’, Paper presented at the 7th Conference on Utility and Risk Theory, Oslo, 1994.

  • AigingerK., P.Brandner and M.Wüger, 1995, ‘Measuring Market Power for Some Industrial Sectors in Austria’, Applied Economics 27, 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • AigingerK. and J.Finsinger (eds.), 1994, Applied Industrial Organization, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • AigingerK. and G.Tichy, 1991, ‘Small Firms and the Merger Mania’, Small Business Economics 3(2), 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • BainJ. S., 1951, ‘Relation of Profit Rate on Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 65, 293–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • BainJ. S., 1956, Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BothwellJ. and T. E.Keeler, 1976, ‘Profits, Market Structure and Portfolio Risk’, in R. T.Masson and David P.Qualls (eds.), Essays in Industrial Organization in Honor of J. S. Bain, Cambridge MA: Ballinger, pp. 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • BresnahanT. F., 1989, ‘Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power’, in R.Schmalensee and R. D.Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • CowlingK. and M.Waterson, 1976, ‘Price Cost Margins and Market Structure’, Economica 38, 378–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • DemsetzH., 1973, ‘Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy’, Journal of Law and Economics 16, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • DemsetzH., 1974, ‘Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly’, in H. J.Goldschmid, H. M.Mann and J. F.Weston (eds.), Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • DixitA. K., 1980, ‘The Role of Investment in Entry Deterrence’, Economic Journal 90, 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • FisherF., 1987, ‘On the Misuse of Profit Sales Ratios to Infer Monopoly Power’, Rand Journal 18, 384–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • FisherF. and J. J.Gowan, 1983, ‘On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits’, American Economic Review 73(1), 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • GaleB. T., 1972, ‘Market Share and the Rate of Return’, Review of Economics and Statistics 54, 421–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, B. T. and B. S. Branch, 1982, ‘Concentration Versus Market Share’, Antitrust Bulletin 00, 83–106.

  • GeroskiP. A., 1986, ‘Specification and Testing the Profits —Concentration Relationship: Some Experiment for the U.K.’, Economica 48, 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A., 1987, ‘Competition and Innovation’, Report prepared for the EC Commission, Brussels.

  • GeroskiP. A., 1988, ‘In Pursuit of Monopoly Power’, Journal of Applied Econometrics 3, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • HäcknerJ., 1994, ‘Collusive Pricing in Markets for Vertically Differentiated Products’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 12(2), 141–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MuellerD. C., 1986, Profits in the Long Run, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MuellerD. C., 1990, The Dynamics of Company Profits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NeumannM., I.Böbel and A.Haid, 1979, ‘Profitability, Risk and Market Structure in West German Industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics 27(3), 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • NeumannM. and A.Haid, 1985, ‘Concentration and Economic Performance’, in J.Schwalbach (ed.), Industry Structure and Performance, Berlin: WZB Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchmalenseeR., 1989, ‘Interindustry Studies of Structure and Performance’, in R.Schmalensee and R. D.Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShapiroC., 1989, ‘Theory of Oligopoly Behavior’, in R.Schmalensee and R. D.Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • SuttonJ., 1990, ‘Explaining Everything, Explaining Nothing’, European Economic Review 34, 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SuttonJ., 1992, Sunk Costs and Market Structure, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TiroleJ., 1989, The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WatersonM., 1980, ‘Price Cost Margin and Successive Market Power’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • WatersonM., 1990, ‘Product Differentiation and Profitability: An Asymmetric Model’, Journal of Industrial Economics 39, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiginger, K. Confronting the implications of the Cournot model with industry and firm data. Small Bus Econ 8, 365–378 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389554

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389554

Keywords

Navigation