Summary
Technetium brain scans and scintiphotos made in a series of 300 patients, harbouring 100 brain lesions, were blindly reviewed and compared. The overall accuracy of the original readings had been 84.5%. — In this series scanning turned out to be more reliable than scintiphotography, either with or without the use of a 1600-channel analyzer, although in a few cases the reverse was true. — Photoscope images, apart from their size and translucency, were found to be no gain. Multichannel analyzing is an advantage, but has not yet made scanning dispensable. We recommend that every negative camera study be followed by conventional scintigraphy.
Zusammenfassung
Bei 300 Patienten (davon 100 Kranke mit cerebralen Läsionen) wurde eine Hirnszintigraphie und eine Szinti-Fotografie durchgeführt und ohne Kenntnis klinischer Daten ausgewertet. Dabei betrug die diagnostische Genauigkeit 84,5%. In der vorliegenden Untersuchungsserie ergab die Szintigrafie die zuverlässigeren Resultate. Es wird gefordert, daß jedes negative Ergebnis der Gamma-Kamera durch die Szintigraphie kontrolliert werden sollte.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eck, J.H.M., van: Isotopen-encefalografie. University of Groningen: Thesis 1968.
—, Woldring, M.G.: Scanning the brain with various radioisotopes. Europ. Neurol. 2, 1–12 (1969).
Gottschalk, A., McCormack, K.R., Adams, J.E., Anger, H.O.: A comparison of results of brain scanning using Ga-68 EDTA and the positron scintillation camera, with Hg-203 Neohydrin and the conventional focused collimator scanner. Radiology 84, 502–506 (1965).
Harris, C.C., Satterfield, M.M., Ross, D.A., Bell, P.R.: Moving detector scanner versus stationary imaging devices. In: Fundamental problems in scanning, ed. by A. Gottschalk and R.N. Beck. Springfield, Illinois, U.S.A.: C.C. Thomas 1968.
Loken, M.K., Telander, G.T., Salmon, R.J.: Technetium-99m compounds for visualization of body organs. J.A.M.A. 194, 152–156 (1965).
—, Wigdahl, L.O., Gilson, J.M., Staab, E.V.: Mercury-197 and mercury-203 chlormerodrin for evaluation of brain lesions using a rectilinear scanner and scintillation camera. J. nucl. Med. 7, 209–218 (1966).
McCready, R.: Clinical comparison of the gamma camera and rectilinear scanner. Erstes Heidelberger Symposium über Kameraszintigraphie, p. 177 (1968).
Miller, M.S., Simmons, G.H.: Optimization of timing and positioning of the technetium brain scan. J. nucl. Med. 9, 429–435 (1968).
Morczek, A., Abraham, K., Otto, H.J., Koch, R.D., Parnitzke, K.H.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Leistungsfähigkeit von Gammaenzephalographie und Kameraszintigraphie beim Hirntumornachweis. Radiobiol. Radiother. (Berl.) 10, 95–102 (1969).
Schenk, P., Penzholz, W., Pietrowski, W., Tornow, W.: Kamerazsintigraphie bei Hirntumoren. Erstes Heidelberger Symposium über Kameraszintigraphie, p. 119 (1968).
Telander, G.T., Loken, M.K.: Comparison of the scintillation camera with a conventional rectilinear scanner using technetium-99 m pertechnetate in a tumor/brain phantom. J. nucl. Med. 8, 481–501 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Eck, J.H.M., Penning, L. Comparison of rectilinear scanning and scintiphotography for the detection of brain lesions. Neuroradiology 1, 107–111 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389444
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389444