Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of metal backing in unicompartmental tibial component fixation

An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of micromotion

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The fixation of the tibial component in 36 patients with conventionally cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasties for femorotibial gonarthrosis was studied using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Twenty-four tibial components were all-polyethylene while 12 were metal-backed. The follow-up was for 6 years. Significant migration was detected for all cases but two and ranged from 0.3 mm to 5.4 mm. The greater part of the migration occurred during the first 1–2 years, after which two-thirds of the prostheses remained stable. Seven all-polyethylene components were subjected to a stress examination after 1–2 years and displacement, induced by external forces, was found in all seven. A strong correlation was found between the extension of the radiolucent line and the migration. Otherwise, neither demographic, clinical, nor radiographic data correlated with the RSA results. In this study metal backing did not have any influence on prosthetic fixation as measured by RSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthritis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol [Suppl] 277

  2. Albrektsson BEJ, Ryd L, Carlsson LV, Freeman MAR, Herberts P, Regner L, Selvik G (1990) The effect of a stem on the tibial component: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of stemmed and non-stemmed, uncemented tibial components in clinically successful Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:252–258

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bae DK, Guhl JF, Keane SP (1983) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for single compartment disease. Clin Orthop 176:233–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartel DL, Burnstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall J (1982)Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement: conventional and revisional design. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:1026–1033

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer GHC (1982) Treatment of gonarthrosis. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Instructional Course Lecture 31, Mosby, St Luois, pp 152–166

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer GHC, Knutsson K, Lindstrand A (1985) Multicentre 6-year follow-up of 1000 arthroplasties for gonarthrosis. 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, paper 795

  7. Cameron HU, Hunter GA (1982) Failure in total knee arthroplasty: mechanisms revisions and results. Clin Orthop 170:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charnley J (1970) The reaction of bone to self-curing acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 52:340–353

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ducheyene P, Kagan A, Lacey JA (1978) Failure of total knee arthroplasty due to loosening and deformation of tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:384–391

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B (1984) Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Acta Orthop Scand 55:629–631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldring SR, Schiller AI, Roelke M, Rourke CM, O'Neill DA, Harris WH (1983) The synovial like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:575–584

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huiskes R (1980) Some fundamental aspects on human joint replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 51 [Suppl] 185; 45–108

    Google Scholar 

  13. Inglis GS (1984) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 66:682–684

    Google Scholar 

  14. Insall JN, Dethmers DA (1982) Revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 170:123–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jònson GT (1981) Compartmental arthroplasty for gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 193:1–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knutsson K, Jònson G, Langer Andersen J, Larusdóttir H, Lidgren L (1981) Deformation and loosening of the tibial component in knee arthroplasty with unicompartmental endoprostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 52:667–674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen ST, Ryd L (1989) Temperature elevation during knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand:439–442

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lewallen DG, Bryan RS, Petterson LFA (1984) Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66:1211–1218

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindstrand A, Boegård T, Egund N, Thorngren K-G (1982) Use of guide instrument for compartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 53:633–639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindstrand A, Stenström A, Egund N (1988) The PCA unicompartmental knee: a 1–4 year comparison of fixation with or without cement. Acta Orthop Scand 59:695–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maquet P, Marchin P de, Simonet J (1967) Bioméchanique du genou et gonarthrose. Rheumatologie 19:51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marmor L (1973) The modular knee. Clin Orthop 94:242–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmot L (1979) Marmor modular knee in unicompartmental disease. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:347

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marmor L (1988) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 228:171–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller J, Burke DL, Stachiewicz JW, Kelebay L (1976) A study of the interface between polymethylmethacrylate and living cortical bone under condition of load bearing. 22nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society, p 191

  26. Mjöberg B, Pettersson H, Rosenquist R, Rydholm A (1994) Bone cement, thermal injury and the radiolucent zone. Acta Orthop Scand 55:597–600

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ryd L (1986) Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 220:1–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryd L, Linder L (1989) On the correlation between micromotion and histology of the bone-cement interface. J Arthroplasty 4:303–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ryd L, Albrektsson BEJ, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Selvik G (1988) Micromotion of non-cemented Freeman-Samuelson prostheses for gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 229:205–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ryd L, Boegård T, Egund N, Lindstrand A, Selvik G, Thorngren K-G (1983) Migration of the tibial component in successful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A clinical, radiographic and roentgen stereo photogrammetric study. Acta Orthop Scand 54:408–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Rosenquist R, Selvik G (1981) Tibial component fixation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 213:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Rosenquist R, Selvik G (1987) Micromotion of conventionally cemented all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee replacements. Arch Trauma Surg 106:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenström A, Selvik G, (1990) Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components: relation between prosthetic position and micromotion. Clin Orthop 251:189–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenström A, Selvik G (1990) Cold-flow of tibial component polyethylene. Acta Orthop Scand 61:321–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Selvik G (1974) A roentgen stereophotogrammetric system for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal systems. Thesis, University of Lund. Reprint in:

  36. Selvik G (1989) Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 232:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vernon-Roberts B, Freeman MAR (1976) Morphological and analytical studies of the tissue adjacent to joint prostheses: investigation into the causes of loosening of prostheses. In: Schaldack M, Hohmann D (eds) Advances in artificial hip and knee joint technology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Walker PS, Ranawat C, Insall JN (1976) Fixation of the tibial component of condylar knee replacement knee prostheses. J Biomech 9:269–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semtlisch M (1974) Reaction of bone to methyl methacrylate after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Surg [Am] 56:1368–1382

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wright TM, Hood RW, Burnstein AH (1982) Analysis of material failure. Orthop Clin North Am 13:33–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was financially supported by Stiftelsen Bistånd åt Vanföra i Skåne, Alfred Österlunds Stiftelse, the Crawford Foundation, Konung Gustav V 80-årsfond, the Medical Faculty of Lund University and Medical Research Council 09509

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryd, L., Lindstrand, A., Stenström, A. et al. The influence of metal backing in unicompartmental tibial component fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111, 148–154 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388089

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388089

Keywords

Navigation