Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 88–93 | Cite as

Wound induced defences in plants and their consequences for patterns of insect grazing

  • P. J. Edwards
  • S. D. Wratten
Original Papers

Summary

Three scales of wound-induced chemical responses in plants are identified: (1) highly localised chemical changes associated with disruption of cell compartmentation; (2) changes induced in cells surrounding the damaged area, forming a kind of halo around the damage, and (3) more widely-dispersed changes which may affect an entire organ, branch or plant. A brief review of the literature reveals that such chemical responses are very widespread in plants, and many of the substances formed are known to affect adversely the growth, development, or reproduction of insects. It is argued that wound-induced changes in plant chemistry represent for insects a powerful selective pressure for the dispersal of grazing. Levels and patterns of invertebrate grazing in a range of herbaceous and deciduous woody plants sampled at the end of the growing seasons were examined. Leaves of many species exhibited a strikingly evident over-dispersion of grazing initiations, and in some cases the arrangement of holes appeared close to regularity. The pattern of damage between leaves was, in most cases, heavily biased towards a large proportion of leaves receiving a low level of grazing. These highly dispersed patterns of grazing damage are consistent with the hypothesis that wound-induced responses play an important role in determining patterns of insect feeding. They have important implications for the expected levels of insect exploitation of host plants and for the advantages to the plant of distributing grazing damage evenly through the canopy.

Keywords

Chlorogenic Acid Sinigrin Trypsin Inhibitor Activity Hydrogen Cyanide Cyanogenic Glycoside 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barz W, Köster J (1981) Turnover and degradation of secondary (natural) products. In: Conn EE (ed) The biochemistry of plants, vol. 7 Secondary plant products. Academic Press, New York. pp 35–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck AB (1964) The oestrogenic isoflavones of subterranean clover. Aust J Agr Res 15:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck SD, Reese JC (1976) Insect-plant interactions: nutrition and metabolism. Recent Advan Phytochem 10:41–92Google Scholar
  4. Benz G (1977) Insect induced resistance as a mean of self defence in plants. Eucarpia/IOBC Working Group Breed Resistance Insects Mites. B 11 SROP 1977/8 Report, 155-159Google Scholar
  5. Bray JR, Gorham E (1964) Litter production in forests of the world. Advan Ecol Res 2:101–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll CR, Hoffmann CA (1980) Chemical feeding deterrent mobilised in response to insect herbivory and counteradaptation by Epilachna tredecemnotata. Science 209:414–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman RF (1974) The chemical inhibition of feeding by phytophagous insects: a review. Bull Entomol Res 64:339–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in population ecology. 35:445–453Google Scholar
  9. Deverall BJ (1977) Defense mechanisms in plants. Cambridge University Press, London, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards P (1977) Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rain forest in New Guinea II. The production and disappearance of litter. J Ecol 65:971–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards PJ, Wratten SD (1982) Wound-induced changes in palatability in birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh. ssp. pubescens). Amer Natur 120:816–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farkas GL, Kiraly Z (1962) Role of phenolic compounds in the physiology of plant diseases and disease resistance. Phytopathol Z 44:105–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friend J (1981) Plant phenolics lignification and plant disease. Progr Phytochem 7:197–261Google Scholar
  14. Ghent AW (1960) A study of the group-feeding behaviour of the larvae of the Jack pine sawfly Neodiprion pratti banksianae Roh. Behaviour 16:110–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 175:776–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haukioja E, Niemelä P (1976) Does birch defend itself actively against herbivores? Rep Kevo Subarct Res Sta 13:44–47Google Scholar
  17. Haukioja E, Niemelä P (1977) Retarded growth of a geometrid larva after mechanical damage to leaves of its host tree. Ann Zool Fenn 14:48–52Google Scholar
  18. Haukioja E, Niemelä P (1979) Birch leaves as a resource for herbivores: seasonal occurrence of increase resistance in foliage after mechanical damage of adjacent, leaves. Oecologia (Berlin) 39:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinrich B (1979) Foraging strategies of catepillars. Oecologia (Berlin) 42:325–337Google Scholar
  20. Hori K (1973) Studies on the feeding habits of Lygus disponsi Linnavuori (Hemiptera: Mirides) and the injury to its host plant. III Phenolic compounds, acid phosphatase and oxidative enzymes in the injured tissue of sugar beet leaf. Appl Entomol Zool 8:103–112Google Scholar
  21. Hori K, Atalay R (1980) Biochemical changes in the tissue of chinese cabbage injured by the bug Lygus disponsi. Appl Entomol Zool 15:234–241Google Scholar
  22. Hösel W (1981) Glycosylation and glycosidases. In: Conn EE (ed) The biochemistry of plants, vol 7. Secondary plant products. Academic Press, New York, pp 725–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones DA (1972) Cyanogenic glycosides and their function. In: Harborne JB (ed) Phytochemical ecology. Academic Press, New York — London, pp 103–122Google Scholar
  24. Kareiva P (1982) Experimental and mathematical analyses of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecol Monogr 52:261–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levin DA (1971) Plant phenolics: an ecological perspective. Amer Natur 105:157–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loper GM (1968) Effect of aphid infestation on the coumestrol content of alfalfa varieties differing in aphid resistance. Crop Sci 8:104–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luckner M, Diettrich B, Lerbs W (1980) Cellular compartmentation and channelling of secondary metabolism in microorganisms and higher plants. Progr Phytochem 6:103–142Google Scholar
  28. Miles PW (1968) Insect secretions in plants. Ann Rev Phytopathol 6:137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morisita M (1962) Iγ-index, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Researches Popul Ecol Kyoto Univ 4:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niemelä P, Aro EM, Haukioja E (1979) Birch leaves as a resource for herbivores. Damage-induced increase in leaf phenols with trypsin-inhibiting effects. Rep Kevo Subarct Res Sta 15:37–40Google Scholar
  31. Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York — London, pp 3–54Google Scholar
  32. Ryan CA (1979) Proteinase inhibitors. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York — London, pp 599–618Google Scholar
  33. Seigler DS (1977) The naturally occurring cyanogenic glycosides. Progr Phytochem 4:83–120Google Scholar
  34. Seigler D, Price PW (1976) Secondary compounds in plants: primary functions. Amer Natur 110:101–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherwood RT, Olah AF, Oleson WH, Jones EE (1970) Effect of disease and injury on accumulation of a flavonoid estrogen coumestrol, in alfalfa. Phytopathology 60:684–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Southwood TRE (1962) Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol Rev Cambridge Phil 37:171–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thielges BA (1968) Altered polyphenol metabolism in the foliage of Pinus sylvestris associated with European pine sawfly attack. Can J Bot 46:724–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson HR (1956) Distribution of distance to nth nearest neighbour in a population of randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37:391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uritani I (1978) Biochemistry of host response to infection. Progr Phytochem 5:29–63Google Scholar
  40. Walker-Simmons M, Ryan CA (1977) Wound-induced accumulation of trypsin inhibitor activities in plant leaves. Plant Physiol 59:437–439PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whittaker RH, Woodwell GM (1969) Structure, production and diversity of the oak-pine forest at Brookhaven, New York J Ecol 56:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woodhead S, Bernays E (1977) Changes in release rates of cyanide in relation to palatability of Sorghum to insects. Nature (London) 270:235–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Edwards
    • 1
  • S. D. Wratten
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe UniversitySouthamptonGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations