Skip to main content
Log in

A kinetic analysis of the facultative photoperiodic response in Amaranthus retroflexus L.

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ontogenetic change taking place in the facultative photoperiodic response of A. retroflexus to inductive short-day (SD) conditions was studied by exposing plants to continuous induction after different initial exposures to long-days (LD), and comparing the kinetics of their developmental responses (cumulative number of plants with reproductive apices, flowering stage, and height of the apical dome). As the plants progressed from emergence to “autonomous” flowering (i.e., in non-inductive conditions), their response to continuous induction became progressively more rapid. Reproductive development was initiated following a progressively shorter lag-phase after the start of induction, but its subsequent rate remained unchanged. Until the onset of reproductive development, the undifferentiated upper part of the shoot apex (apical dome) elongated much more rapidly in SD than in LD. However, in both cases reproductive development was initiated when the apex had elongated to about the same extent, after which its elongation accelerated considerably, but to similar rates in both photoperiods. The data indicate that progress towards reproductive development takes place in inductive (SD), as well as in non-inductive (LD) photoperiods, but one cycle of the latter is as effective as 0.20–0.25 of a cycle of the former. —Plants induced at different stages in ontogeny started to change their subsequent branching pattern (ratio of leafy to leafless branches) as soon as induction was delayed beyond “autonomous” flowering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LD:

long-days

SD:

short-days

RGR:

Relative Growth Rate

References

  • Lang, A.: Physiology of flower initiation. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol. XV, pt. 2, pp. 1380–1536, Ruhland, W., ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Nougarède, A. Gifford, E.M., Rondet, P.: Cytohistological studies of the apical meristem of Amaranthus retroflexus under various photoperiodic regimes. Bot. Gaz. 126, 281–298 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, F.B.: The flowering process. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince-Prue, D.: Photoperiodism in plants. London: McGraw-Hill 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Went, F.W.: The experimental control of plant growth. Waltham, Mass., USA: Chron. Bot. 1957

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koller, D., Kigel, J. & Ovadiah, S. A kinetic analysis of the facultative photoperiodic response in Amaranthus retroflexus L.. Planta 136, 13–19 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00387918

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00387918

Key words

Navigation